Blog has moved, searching new blog...

Friday, March 02, 2012

Some Thoughts on Irmin Vinson

I bought a new book last weekend. While I have not yet finished it, what I have read so far is absolutely wonderful - a clear, sensible examination of topics that many White advocates consider difficult or imprudent to discuss.

The book is Irmin Vinson's Some Thoughts on Hitler & Other Essays. The promotional blurb reads:
Why are we subjected to more anti-Hitler propaganda today than during World War II?

Why are white nations blanketed with Holocaust memorials, even countries where the Holocaust did not take place?

Why do most people know how many Jews died during World War II but have no idea how many non-Jews died?

Irmin Vinson’s Some Thoughts on Hitler and Other Essays is a book about propaganda. Vinson explains how the organized Jewish community uses the memory of Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust as weapons to stigmatize the patriotism and ethnic pride not just of Germans, but of all whites, including those who fought against Hitler.

Vinson explains how this spurious white guilt and self-hatred has been used to break down white resistance to multiculturalism, miscegenation, affirmative action, and the invasion and colonization of white homelands by non-white immigrants—trends which, if not reversed, will lead to white extinction.

In these clear, rational, and highly readable essays, Irmin Vinson exposes and demolishes this insidious propaganda, clearing the way for the reemergence of white pride and patriotism. Some Thoughts on Hitler will change more than your view of the past; it will also change your understanding of the present—and of our destiny
See also Kevin MacDonald's Foreword.

Vinson's long essay titled Holocaust Commemoration forms the core of the book. I do not recall reading this essay previously, but passages like this one made me wonder if I must have:
The public discourse of the Jewish Holocaust is incoherent: it speaks in the universalist language of tolerance and inclusion, while justifying Jewish particularism in Israel; it claims to find in stories of Jewish wartime suffering distinctively Jewish humanitarian lessons, applicable to everyone everywhere, while borrowing them from the historical religion of the West; it teaches human brotherhood, while elevating the suffering of Jews far above all other suffering; it commemorates Jewish powerlessness, while demonstrating Jewish power. But beneath all its deceptions and contradictions lies the message of broad Western responsibility for German mistreatment of Jews, a special culpability which Rabbi Eliezer Berkovits, a self-styled Holocaust theologian, has called "the measureless Christian guilt toward the Jewish people." [6]

Institutionalized Holocaust commemoration in the United States presupposes that White Americans are notably deficient in the various moral qualities that Holocaust remembering purportedly inculcates, whereas Jews, owing to their group experience of nazi persecution, are the appropriate teachers of necessary lessons in racial tolerance. Those peculiar meanings did not, needless to say, arise unaided from stories of German atrocities against European Jewry. The truth of our collective guilt required an aggressive reinterpretation of the Second World War, an assault on the moral legitimacy of the Western nations that fought and won it. Through a remarkable transformation, the Allied victors have become co-agents in the crimes and alleged crimes of the regime they defeated, and the war itself has been reimagined as a Judeocentric moral test, which all of us conspicuously failed. Our measureless guilt, together with the entire edifice of Holocaust commemoration erected upon it, is a doctrine of moral equivalence projected back into the past in order to shape the present.
Vinson fleshes out and hammers home the points I only tersely outlined in A White Guide to the Jewish Narrative. Beside jewish morality and the holocaust narrative, touched on above, Vinson identifies an early example of the generalization of the jewish narrative to "minorities" and the racial aggression behind it:
An Early Holocaust Lesson

In 1944, as the war in Europe was drawing to a close, Jewish playwright Arthur Miller, then in his late twenties, sat down to write Focus, his first and only novel. [7] It would be a critical moral fable about his fellow Americans, for Miller did not share the heroic self-image and traditional patriotism that characterized most other Americans during the war years. Focus, published in 1945, would be an imaginative elaboration of a very simple thesis: being a Jew in Roosevelt's America was like being a Jew in Hitler's Germany. In their irrational hatred of the Jewish Other, White Americans, the same White Americans who were then fighting fascism in Europe and the Far East, were no different from nazis.

Lawrence Newman, the novel's WASP protagonist, is a corporate personnel manager whose quiet bourgeois world is permanently disrupted after he begins to wear eyeglasses, which strangely make him look Jewish, a dangerous liability in the America of Miller's fertile imagination. Without glasses Newman is a gray-flanneled Episcopalian, a normal White American, despite his ethnically ambiguous surname; with glasses he is perceived and treated as a despised Jew, persecuted and even attacked by other normal White Americans, all of whom are racist and anti-Semitic, as Newman had been before he gained his factitious Jewishness. The novel's organizing narrative conceit, that eyeglasses can turn an anti-Semitic Gentile into a Jew, conveys an obvious Judeocentric meaning: Lawrence Newman, in his culpable blindness to the intolerance that surrounds him, must first be seen as a Jew in order to see clearly. Thus in his new role as a reluctant Jew, now seeing and experiencing the world through the Jewish lenses conferred by his racial marginalization, Newman gradually discovers that his homogenous New York neighborhood, which had once seemed a benign social environment of communal amity, is in reality, beneath its placid surface, a seething caldron of xenophobia and hate, at least for anyone with the misfortune to be different, or in his case merely to appear different. "Behind these snug, flat-roofed houses," Newman now perceives, "a sharp-tipped and murderous monster was nightly being formed, and its eyes were upon him."

The novel's historical context is central to its subject. In Focus the European war, depicted in our propaganda as a titanic struggle of good against evil, seems little more than a distant contest between two rival groups of pogromists, each nurturing its own "murderous monster" of racial hatred. In Europe German nazis conduct mass hangings of Jews, while at home angry anti-Semites, organized into the Christian Front, part of a large network of patriotic organizations spread across the country, beat Jews and rape Puerto Ricans as they await the return of the American military, who will then assume the lethal role of storm troops in driving Jews from America, beginning first in New York, the center of Jew-hatred. White America's cleansing war against Jewry will begin, as an activist neighbor informs Newman, "when the boys come home," since American combatants in the European war are at one with their German enemies in their implacable anti-Semitism.

In the political environment we now all inhabit, nothing in Focus is startling, nothing would be out of place in a sensitivity workshop or an anti-racialist educational exercise. The novel's vision of a virulently racist America would have appeared radical in 1945; now it is commonplace, especially for young Whites immersed in a rigorous program of multicultural miseducation. Miller, alarmed by the failure of non-Jews to comprehend "the threatening existence of Nazism," and unimpressed by the fact that many men of his age cohort were then dying in Europe fighting Germans, took it upon himself to teach an early version of what would eventually become the most insidious of the Jewish Holocaust's numerous lessons, namely that pathological ("nazi") hatreds lurk behind the West's superficially civilized exterior. Whereas American wartime propaganda had, naturally enough, presented NS Germany as the moral antonym of the United States in particular and of the democratic West in general, Miller substituted a much different contrastive structure, placing innocent Jews on one side and lethally malevolent Whites on the other, with racial minorities like Blacks and Puerto Ricans in ancillary roles as occasional victims of White intolerance. This structure, which Miller may have been the first to discover, conflated Germans and their enemies in order to nazify White Gentiles as a whole. Focus was a thorough defamation of Euro-America for its endemic anti-Semitism and racial hatred, the purpose of which was to efface any significant moral distinction between ourselves and the propaganda image of the Nazi. Miller's nazification required the Nazi as the acknowledged representation of evil, but his concrete targets were White Americans, who had not yet seen their own visible racial pathologies.
From this Vinson boldly infers:
An imaginative Jew writing before the liberation of the German concentration camps could arrive at nazifying Holocaust propaganda without the Holocaust, which suggests that the Holocaust does not represent events during the Second World War but rather reveals Jewish attitudes toward their benefactors. The Holocaust, as an idea, was latent Jewish racial aggression awaiting both a symbol and an opportunity to express itself.
Yes indeed. Likewise for the Six Million Holocausts phenomena.

Labels: , , ,



Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's got a good cover on it, too. Fits in well with a few other portrayals of Hitler as an affable fellow that I've seen in the past few years, a subtle but subversive trend.

3/02/2012 08:08:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If Vinson is suggesting that Wasps in Oz, Canada, the UK or US were not anti-semitic and racist, or that they fought to save the Jews, then he's wrong, they were. The point missed is that why is the desire to freely associate, to discriminate, to exclude, a fundamental tenet of classical liberalism, allowed to be characterized as hatred and thus made irrational?

3/02/2012 11:59:00 PM  
Anonymous knight said...

I became more positive about the anti-white/jewish question lately

People are more openly "racists" nowadays with Obama, they are tired of the Middle-East/Muslims and politicians kowtowing to almighty israel

I think in the next 20 years we gonna see some sort of "new right" movent gain power in Europe or in the US.

3/03/2012 02:11:00 PM  
Anonymous Captainchaos said...

"White America's cleansing war against Jewry will begin, as an activist neighbor informs Newman, 'when the boys come home,' since American combatants in the European war are at one with their German enemies in their implacable anti-Semitism."

But were it so.

3/03/2012 10:18:00 PM  
Anonymous JMR said...

When I was an adolescent growing up in England in the 60's the 1st World War had been over for 45 years and seemed like "History" to me . Another time, almost another culture whose mores and values seemed just as strange as those of the Victorians. Even the 2nd World War seemed 'over"
Now the 2nd World War has been over for nearly 70 years and it seems to be more "present'in the media than ever I remember it to have been in the 60's.
There are still reports in newspapers about jewish prisoners from camps. They must be literally digging them up and resurrecting them! How come these people, who have been allegedly so badly treated, survived so long? How many are still claiming reparations from the German government?
There are almost daily snippets about Hitler;the latest being that he had a child with a French woman.Documentaries about the 2nd World war are on television the whole time. Films distorting the whole History of the 2nd. World war such a Bastards Inglorious are continually produced.The Jews are making History up through the media and implanting a false consciousness in each generation.
I for one wonder why Germans have put up with this constant stream evil propaganda for so long without reacting!

3/04/2012 07:34:00 AM  
Anonymous katharsis said...

The WWII as the last moment of untainted glory for the Anglo-sphere countries and Russia, it's used by the jewmedia to bash Continental Europe.

People everywhere who can think for themselves are already conscious that the "West" is finished in the coming decades.

The pride of have won WWII and defeated Fascism is the religion of multiculturalists in Britain, US, Canada and so on.

3/04/2012 08:50:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Its not about just one guy living in the 'hood though, is it?

3/04/2012 12:10:00 PM  
Anonymous Sheila said...

Another excellent and informative essay, Tan. I'll be getting the book.

JMR - good comment. The wholesale re-writing of our history, the reshaping of communal memory, is an ongoing process directed by Jewish media and funded by Jewish money. Currently, WWII is "the good war," because it was fought for the noble cause of freeing the Jews. It was won by the Navajo code talkers, the Nisei, the Red Tails, Rosie the Riveter, and the Jewish soldiers (Inglorious basterds). Anyone but White males. As time goes on, this myth will morph further into one of complicit White, Christian aggression against the Jews as the cause of an unnecessary war, of which the Jews were, as always, the primary and intended victims.

Those who call blacks the Jews' puppets are correct, in this respect. While black savagery and dysfunction is genetic, this interpreting of "crimes" based on the purported culprit's thoughts, or mindset, or prejudices at the time, is of Jewish origin. Whites (Christians or not) have been made culpable merely for being White, and their very existence (as anything other than a groveling apologist to the Jews) is an affront to the civilized Jews who, rightly, serve as humanity's conscience,

Who, whom, without end.

3/04/2012 01:01:00 PM  
Anonymous Sheila said...

Great minds . . . I just went from here to Irish Savant and what did I find, but:

"So read this excerpt from a Pravda article from 2009. Could you just imagine this kind of truth finding its way into our lamestream bought and paid for outfits?

Throughout the totalitarian West, the Marxist internationalist elites, while busily flooding their countries with tens of millions of third worlders, have introduced specific measures to keep the native populations down and in check.

These measures have come in the form of Hate Crimes Laws. The laws state that a crime is not just a crime if we can find a deeper motive, such as hate of a specific race, sex, religion or sexual orientation. Thus the Lords of Humanity have given themselves the power of God to know what is inside the hearts of men.
In practical terms, what this means is 1. A murder is not just a murder if hate is involved. Say again? This means certain lives are worth more than others, a protected class, another insult to Christ and justice. 2. If the local jury trial is considered to lenient, then those globalist elites of the West can try the person again for "hate" or rather in actuality for the same crime, twice. Again, an insult to justice that Western serfs bow, grin and bare.

But this gets worse, since in practice, the elites decide who is a racist and who is not, they use these laws sparingly to keep the native population down, shackled and paranoid of the knock on the door."

3/04/2012 01:06:00 PM  
Anonymous Scott said...


3/04/2012 05:25:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

There is a new documentary in the YouTube right now:

They never let us forget who is the boss.... never.

3/04/2012 07:02:00 PM  
Anonymous JMR said...

Is there no end to their greed?

3/05/2012 12:59:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home