Some Parts of London Aren't Burning
Vigilante groups aim to combat riots - Crime, UK - The Independent, 9 August 2011:Pictures beamed around the world throughout Monday night's rioting more often than not showed police and locals conceding the streets to baying mobs who trashed shops and set fire to cars or buildings with near impunity.They also have a secret weapon.
Yet there were instances where locals physically resisted the looters. In Dalston, a corner of north east London with a large Turkish community, men hit the streets armed with baseball bats and sticks, fighting running battles with masked youths. In Whitechapel youths chased away rioters and in one restaurant in Notting Hill kitchen staff armed themselves with knives to protect diners from rampaging muggers.
"What the Turkish community did was brilliant, they made the area a safer place," said Tonya Cavanagh, a 39-year-old shopkeeper who runs a neighbourhood watch system in the area. "Everybody is really thankful. I think more people will go and help out the Turkish people too now. It makes you want to stick together."In other words, minimizing diversity is a good way to defend yourself and your community from the depredations of marauding "diversity".
In Whitechapel, home to Britain's largest Bangladeshi community, locals described how a gang of 70 masked rioters were chased out of the neighbourhood by Bengali youths who had gathered for evening prayers outside East London Mosque.
"There's a real sense of community here, especially during Ramadan when people are supposed to look out for each other," said Abdul Jalil, the manager of the Deshi Fish grocery store opposite the mosque. "The shutters will come down this evening but I'm definitely going to stick around in case the rioters come into the area again."
Of course, don't expect to hear that from anyone in the anti-White regime. What they'll say instead is, "YOU SEE, YOU SEE, WHAT WE NEED IS MORE TURK AND BANGLADESHI DIVERSITY!"
Labels: britain, race, the multicult
posted by Tanstaafl at 8/09/2011 04:56:00 PM
24 Comments:
Needless to say armed mobs of non-whites get a free pass in this department.
An armed mob of whites acting in a simiar manner would be attacked on mutiple levels at once. For being vigilantes, for being racist.
However....
Check out these videos, its all a bit disordered but its a liberals worst nightmare, the doomsday sceanrio. Working class white men on the streets ready to fight the looters ie black men.
Btw, note these white guys are not wearing masks, not wearing hoodies, they are not looters.
From Inspector Gadget, a British police blog...
London Riots; Multiculturalism – the deafening sound of pennies dropping all over Britain tonight., 8 Aug 2011.
We don’t need the army – we need the order to ‘charge’, 9 Aug 2011:
"The arson damage is quite unlike anything I have ever seen, even in Belfast in the bad old days. It is important that this is not under-reported, the scenes of damage are quite extraordinary.
I have spoken to many law-abiding members of the public. Feelings are running very high against local youths. People are displaying hatred and frustration, flavoured by a fair amount of racism. I don’t think there is an appetite for funding any further assistance to the part of the community which caused this.
The overwhelming feeling is that major force should be used now, before things get completely out of hand. People are worried they will die in their houses. The arson threat is everywhere. There is a lot of frustration about lack of police attendance until we tell them we are from Ruralshire, then they are just silent as the implications of this sink in."
Thanks for news about Bangladeshis.
OT: Evil Nazi News
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/08/ludwig-f-clauss-racial-style-racial-character-part-i/
The Office of Racial Policy of the NSDAP(Das Rassenpolitische Amt der NSDAP)has printed pictures and plaques and has distributed them in German schools, where we read in large letters the following words: Each race in itself represents the highest value.
Robert in Arabia
Counter-jihadists smeared.
"In a potentially troublesome development, one far-right group said that about 1,000 of its members around the country were taking to the streets to deter rioters.
"We're going to stop the riots — police obviously can't handle it," Stephen Lennon, leader of the far-right English Defense League, told The Associated Press. He warned that he couldn't guarantee there wouldn't be violent clashes with rioting youths.
Anders Behring Breivik, who has confessed to the bombing and massacre that killed 77 people in Norway last month, has cited the EDL as an inspiration.
Meanwhile virtually every major city in England was seeing some form of unrest."
So: rioting, arson and plunder in virtually every major English city, the English population paralyzed, the political class that did such a great job diversifying and wimp-ifying the English nation doing nothing effective, the police service that too often led the charge in disarming and further wimp-ifying ordinary White English people also falling far short of reasonable expectations, and LOOK OUT! - those EDL types (known for their single-minded support for Israel first) are a potential THREAT! Why they inspired Anders Behring Breivik, also an ardent supporter of Israel!
Never mind the smearing and casual inaccuracy of the mainstream media. That's old news.
What I see is a conflict that's as mad, tangled and useless (to most good people and to the cause of freedom) as Star Wars I-III, with the Emperor running both Count Duku's rebellion and his own reaction, and tyranny to come whoever wins.
On the one side we've got policies of destructive multiculturalism and "diversity" that are supported by organized Jewry internationally. (I agree with Tanstaafl that these policies have been devastating for the cohesion and sense of community that the English people need for their defense.)
And the beginning of an organized "popular" reaction (the English Defense League)is flying the Star of David.
And that in itself is under attack by Pamela Geller and others, for not being sufficiently pro-Jewish - because you know, Jewish interests are all-important.
If we Whites are going to sort out our problems, even just enough to survive the forces now being lined up against us, so we can have a future, we have to be about our own interests, our own history and our own future.
The present situation is a tangled, dysfunctional mess at best, from the point of view of White interests. And it's not getting better.
We need Jewish interests sidelined and Jewish fronts and Jewish voices marginalized.
Down with Duku and Palpatine!
Jewish sympathy muted because of historic grievances: Great Britain has not given enough support to Israel in its conflict with the Palestinians.
The AP story Daybreaker links above: Police calm London, but riots flare across UK
The EDL troubles the regime more than riots.
London riots: 'People are fighting back. It's their neighbourhoods at stake'
Each ethnic group is fighting as a uniform mass. When there is no resistance of that type, typically there seems to be no resistance at all.
When Whites organize as Whites, they are as effective as any other group.
"Around 200 people were walking around the centre of Eltham, south-east London, following rumours that the area was going to be the latest place to be hit by disturbances. The group, predominantly men, had been congregating in pubs since the rumours began to circulate in mid-afternoon. "This is a white working-class area and we are here to protect our community," said one man. In Enfield, north London, about 70 men were seen chasing a group of youths."
Some comments at TOO are getting pretty good. Enoch Powell was right…
An interesting comment at the Telegraph:
david_sparks
Today 02:44 PM
Recommended by
6 people
To all those BNP/EDL talking about 'revenge'....
Thick shaven-headed tattooed thugs roaming the streets. That's the last thing most of us want, and was specifically condemned by the police superintendent on the radio today - he was talking about "groups of right-wing thugs who looked like they had just come from the nearest football ground".
I'm not sure how you're achieving 'revenge' on all the white rioters and looters, or addressing the fact that many of the shopkeepers who've lost everything are Asian, Turkish or black.
...
I don't know if what he said was true, that is if it is what the superintendent said. But it does seem in line with the prejudices of the police and the authorities in general.
Anyone wanting to hammer the anti-Whites might enjoy this site with a collection of videos of "Vigilantes" forming to protect their communities and heritage. Anti-whites are there, and we are hammering them. Feel free to join the fray!
http://pictur.eu/londonriots/vigilante-groups/#comment-42
Where are the reports of equally senior police officers, or any police officers, going on radio to denounce non-White defenders of their communities, such as Turks, in terms as politicized and hostile as "groups of right-wing thugs who looked like they had just come from the nearest football ground"? I can't find any. Can anyone else?
The British police and media let you know the real dangers of this rioting:
----------
Right-wing extremists hijacking the vigilante patrols protecting against looters, warn police
http://tinyurl.com/3cmvy53
England riots: When is it right to turn vigilante?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14473781
-----------
They still control the media, reality is what they say it is. They still have the power and these articles tell you what they consider to be important. Nothing will come out of this, it's still about the Leftist/Jewish elites battening on the white population while they die and using non-whites as stormtroopers. Non-white "vigilantes" - good, White Vigilantes - bad and a threat. It just doesn't get any more blatant than this. Unless it's the no hate crimes in the Wisconsin Fair attacks thing.
Jerry, Yes, the anti-white media is still control, but they are rapidly loosing control. Try thinking about and using this.
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
Immigrants love this country more than we do, Telegraph, 10
Aug 2011:
"Across the country, ethnic communities have emerged as the heroes of the week’s riots – and, in the case of the three Muslim youths who were killed as they defended their neighbourhood in Birmingham, its martyrs. They have shown themselves to be not just as law-abiding as the Anglo-Saxons, but far more inspiring.
For many Britons, who have long looked down on the newcomers, or mocked them for their Borat values, this will come as a surprise – probably an uncomfortable one. The burgeoning immigrant community has been caricatured as anti-gay, anti-women, and dangerously intolerant. The sight of Polish Catholics, Punjabi Sikhs or Muslim Turks has filled liberal hearts with fears of social polarisation, and of religion intruding into the public square. Traditionalists suspect that the Muslim influx, in particular, threatens to destroy the already fragile hold of our Judaeo-Christian traditions: George Carey, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, has warned the Government against taking in groups who fail to “understand our Christian heritage”.
The response to the riots should humble these sceptics."
. . .
"Yet in the tight-knit enclaves peopled by Kurds, Sikhs, Poles and others, a strong sense of community does survive. Everyone knows each other and what they’re up to; and everyone shares a clear belief system. It is an environment that can prove distinctly uncomfortable for non‑conformists: passing judgment is as much part of this existence as halal butchery or carp at Christmas. But it also provides an invaluable safety net that makes the state’s assistance redundant. It is mutual obligations, not government incentives or punishments, that motivates members of such communities. Dependence on the state is largely seen as unacceptable.
Equally importantly, the alternatives to the family so cherished by liberals have never taken root: marriage is the model they live by and aspire to. Divorce is almost nil, single motherhood ditto; extended families living together are routine. Strong immigrant families support their children, but also supply them with a lifelong moral compass"
There you have it. The illogic of the multicult spelled out and rubbed in your face. The various monocultural immigrant enclaves retain a strong sense of community, which makes them better than you. You swallowed the multcult lie, which means when you try to defend your community you're a stupid, evil, racist vigilante.
From the Encyclopedia of Diasporas: Immigrant and Refugee Cultures Around the World, Eds. Melvin Ember, Carol R. Ember and Ian Skoggard (Springer, New York and HRAF, Yale, 2005):
[South Asian Diaspora, p.293]
The South Asian population is clustered in pockets and sharply segmented along religious and ethnic lines in London, southeast England, and the West Midlands in a region known as the ‘Asian corridor.’ Thus, Wembley has a greater concentration of Gujarati Hindus, while Southall is largely Sikh. Bradford and Birmingham are known for the Pakistani and Bangladeshi Muslim concentrations. Entire Sikh and Gujarati villages are imported into England replete with local politics. South Asians in Britain resist cultural homogenization and even maintain caste affiliations through their marriage traditions. Religion is the central organizing force for many British South Asians, with mosques, gurdwaras (Sikh places of worship), and temples functioning not only as centers of social life, but also of political protest. This adherence to religious and cultural identity and homeland politics has been a double-edged sword, keeping South Asians ghettoized on one hand, but also helping them cope with the stresses of living in a racist, European-dominated society. Racism is a daily reality in Britain, reinforced and institutionalized by entrenched patterns of residential accommodation and employment practices.
****
We nationalists often gripe about being called ‘racists’ - here’s the answer. Ditch the ‘racism’ and follow the example of the gentle Asian colonists: self-segregation on ethnic lines; active resistance to cultural homogenisation; adherence to religious and cultural identity; and top it all off with a bit of homeland politics. Easy!
--- Nice to have an authoritative source for the claim that whole villages from South Asia have been ‘imported’ into Britain. I’ve seen that called ‘paranoid fantasy’ before.
I don't gripe about being called a racist. I gripe about racism being portrayed as a bad thing.
the illogic of the multicult
"There you have it. The illogic of the multicult spelled out and rubbed in your face. The various monocultural immigrant enclaves retain a strong sense of community, which makes them better than you."
We often hear the same nonsense from leftists who come back from their vacations in the third-world: in Nowhereistan, people are poor, but generous, and not dysfunctional as we have become, they remain a close knit society and there are lots of things they could teach us...
But the same leftists expect White people to give a job, an apartment, and family allowances to every Javanese who comes out of his jungle to settle in the West. The cost of such a policy is the complete destruction of White society.
Leftist stupidity is mind-boggling. For example, the Telegraph's journalist writes of the "many Britons, who have long looked down on the newcomers, or mocked them for their Borat values".
In fact, Baron-Cohen’s Borat film was poking fun at White people, not at Third-world people. Steve Sailer says that it was basically one giant old-fashioned Polish Joke. As I see it, an anti-Polish joke told by a Jew is an anti-White joke. It reminds me of the neocons who complain about "white trash".
Good point Armor.
If the poor-but-humble non-whites are that way because of their environment, then why change that by moving them into a white country.
Or...
Are they implying that these people are implicitly better than us, you know, genetically? In which case thats a racist belief in racial difference.
The "leave it all to the police" nonsense has nothing to do with historic Anglo-Saxonism-it's an attribute of the total state that arose in the 20th Century:
http://houseofdumb.blogspot.com/2011/08/robert-peel-vigilante.html
"...but the central issue is this: the argument against vigilantism is a constitutional as well as a moral absurdity."
"Consider Sir Robert Peel's own principles of law enforcement, specifically number 7:"
Police, at all times, should maintain a relationship with the public that gives reality to the historic tradition that the police are the public and the public are the police; the police being only members of the public who are paid to give full-time attention to duties which are incumbent upon every citizen in the interests of community welfare and existence.
"Or, to put it another way, the police are just citizens in uniform, which means the idea that one group of citizens are required to curl up in a ball and await rescue from another bunch of citizens makes not a lick of sense. If it's illegal for one group of citizens to patrol their own neighbourhood, then that would surely apply to hirelings of the state drafted in from out of town."
From Reuters, a few days ago: "Police have warned that vigilantes are putting their own safety at risk and could make matters worse"
The newspapers would like us to believe that the advice given by the police is based on their experience and their desire to protect us. In fact, the police repeats whatever the government tells them to say. And the government isn't interested in protecting White people.
Never mind the looters, what about the ‘fascists’?, Brendan O’Neill, spiked:
"This riotous week has confirmed that the great and the good of Great Britain don’t have much in the way of a shared morality anymore. At the start of the week, the political class, cops and Fourth Estate all proffered various explanations for the youthful violence, often pointing the finger of blame at each other in a moral stand-off not dissimilar to the final scene in Reservoir Dogs. Yet by Friday they were tentatively re-linking arms around the one thing they agree on: that there is nothing scarier - nothing - than the sight of 100+ white blokes on the streets, shouting things in those gruff voices they have. You may have looked at the groups of men in Enfield and Eltham and seen working people keen to protect their homes and shops, but the upper echelons of society, through their snob-goggles, saw the emergence of an English version of the Third Reich – they saw ‘race hate’ and ‘fascists patrolling the streets’.
The Metropolitan Police now seem to be devoting as much energy to issuing warnings to the ‘white mob’ to lay down their baseball bats and go back to their Mock Tudor houses as they are to analysing their own fantastic failure to get a handle on the riots. This ‘vigilantism’, as a Met spokesman called it, ‘needs to stop’."
Great Peel quote, anon.
Much talk of militias 'round my way these days.
Post a Comment
<< Home