How Whites Took Over America
How whites took over America (This link fast-forwards to where the argument begins.)
This video was perhaps inspired by the cartoon discussed in Anti-White Rationalizations at Reddit. It's the same idea: Apply anti-"racist" rhetoric to non-Whites. The resulting cognitive dissonance and gnashing of teeth highlights the disturbing reality that anti-"racism" is anti-White.
I don't find the underlying subject at all amusing, but I have to admit that I chuckled quite a few times at Horus' pitch-perfect delivery of arrogant, mendacious, judeo-liberal moralizing.
Labels: immigration, the multicult, video
38 Comments:
haha, I just watched that on another site--I love that it is getting spread around so fast :)
Btw: I just attended the Amren confernece in Tennessee. I wanted to write to you so many times during it as the jewish influence was STRONG--not the subtle undertow I expected at all. Still, I am glad I went--it was my first pro-White event (even though sullied by loud mouth jewish presence) and I met some good people who felt the same as me.
No it's not self defeating. It's history made jewish. Whites did not totally genocide Indians as is proposed here. But Anti-White racism proposes just that. Listen to what they say!
Franklin appears to not "see" the way the video uses a "strap-on" dildo of irony to "F" the anti-White narrative right in the soft spots.
No. it completely and unapologetically legitamizes the passing of the Indians onto reservations and forces White folks into an understanding of the Who/Whom question. It forces Whites to understand language as power and the power relation it is.
Healthy.
My only criticism is it isn't very good. The voices are stupid and the dialogue is stilted.
I dont focus on American Indians. I like to talk about the terrible racism of Tibetans who criticize the Chinese who, after all, only want to move to Tibet for a better life etc etc blah blah.
Lurker
Franklin Ryckaert,
the story does not show the reality.
The settlers were white racists at this time and therefore do no try to eliminate the Indians. What the Indians will not survive, is the anti-racist politics of non-white immigration and specific anti-racist measures. For example, these days government forces them to accept people in their nation they do not want.
Btw: I just attended the Amren confernece in Tennessee. I wanted to write to you so many times during it as the jewish influence was STRONG--not the subtle undertow I expected at all. Still, I am glad I went--it was my first pro-White event (even though sullied by loud mouth jewish presence) and I met some good people who felt the same as me.
I'm sure most of the people there get it about jews. That's because Pro-jew Jared's not actually bringing anyone new into the movement, as his defenders claim. That's not his goal. His goal is to take people who have already been awakened via other means and convince them that it's bad strategy to openly name the jew.
Along the same lines as the Youtube video, we have this brilliant satire:
Anders Breivik 2011, and Chief Opechancanough, 1622: How Do We Handle the Hate?
Discussion of the video at BUGS: For Your Visual Pleasure.
Responding to Franklin's comment above, H.Avenger writes:
"NonWhites are ALREADY saying that. They have been saying that for decades. What else is new? Lets say we did some soft, cozy, so called conservative animation. Does this fool actually think the nonwhites will go through some behavioral change? lol. Mind you, their behavior is by and large because of massive AntiWhite programming by Team Pink Rabbit.
There is a war going on between ProWhites and AntiWhites. Non Whites only have the power the AntiWhite Whites (Jew and Gentile alike) give THEM. Marginalize the AntiWhite Whites BUGS style and everything else will fall into place. It’s 2012, no use in sitting in fear of populations who have to buy weapons systems from WHITE countries. Keep your eyes on the prize."
I agree with Horus. The video is aimed at moving Whites. All the better if it stirs anti- and non-Whites to spew bile.
I liked it, and shared it with friends.
I'm sorrrry to say sir, blah blah blah blah blah, sir. Now the anti-Whites sir, will say that the Whites DESERRRVE to underrrgo the same fate as a punishment for their historrric crrrime, sir. How about that sir?"- End pontification
Then let them say it, SIR! Past Genocide is not a valid excuse to commit genocide. The more the anti-Whites own up to their promotion of genocide against the White race, the better. Anti-racist is just a code word for anti-White. You should probably go back to your books Franklin. This is war for our survival, not a scholarly debate among colleagues.
Most people can acknowledge that we took America from the Indians without believing that we deserve to have it taken from us. I don't think that's really an issue. Forcing people to admit that what is happening to us is very similar to what happened to the Indians is a good first step.
Is it not like punishing a thief who robs and then living off the proceeds of the robbery? It's hypocritical at best, criminal at worst, but surely highly immoral.
I would move. Demography is destiny.
California is lost for now.
@YIH
You want us to stop talking about jews, then refute what we say. Show Tanstaafl, David Duke and the others where they're wrong.
Demanding someone stops talking about a subject "cuz its lame" isn't a good enough reason i'm afraid. In any case the ball's in your camp, show us what you got.
Well said Cherub's Revenge.
Of course we should fight any people who threaten our people. But, why focus only and specifically on blacks and other non-Whites, instead of the people who keep throwing these scum into our midst?
In Oz we never had a black problem as such, not even an Aboriginal problem. Today the Aboriginal grievance industry is a wholly concocted dispute driven by Jews through our legal system, academia and politics. It can be easily invesitigated, though of course to demonstrate Jewish leadership and manipulation in this industry will lead to charges of anti-semitism.
Why does Oz now have an african problem? We never had Africans in our nation, yet today they are starting to overwhelm some city suburbs with their always attendant violence.
Well, who brought them here? Who are the ones agitating for open borders and releasing this filth into the areas our people live?
Surely they are the ones to go after as a matter of priority. And it is the hardest road to take because the proponents are the most heavily defended, protected, and offer the harshest offense in retribution.
It's not an either or situation. Our goal is to protect our people so that our people will thrive again. Defend us from non-Whites in our immediate suburbs and go after the Jews and various traitorous whites who deliberately agitate and scheme to mix us with people who hate us.
Oh, and Happy Easter to all at Age of Treason.
Anonymous If you are White and really believe what you say, then what are you doing here? If you are honest you don't wait until the rest return their share to return yours.
Exactly. Anon just admitted to receiving stolen goods. He should give them back, not accuse everyone else of committing the crime he just confessed to.
P.S., no, really, FUCK YOU captcha.
P.P.S., time to sell your captcha stock, folks.
God willing, in time the mestizo tide can be rolled back from California and elsewhere.
A self-confident White nation in North America would have no problem doing that.
Its not ultimately about Mexicans. There are many white Mexicans, faced with a resurgent white power in America many of them would get with the program. As things stand throwing in their lot with mestizos (and full amerindian) yields rewards for being 'hispanic'. La Raza and all that.
Armor If race does not exist, then genocide does not exist. lol
That sure didn't fly for old Saddam Hussein now did it? He didn't get to say, "Well, now those Kurds were just a social constructs." He swung.
Genral Custer was the first martyr for open borders.
Robert in arabia
The native American Indians had no concept of land ownership.
Do the Indian characters sound like kill of the hill on purpose?
@ Katana, I fully agree.This video converts only the already converted. They already understand the falsehoods of PC-speech and are already over the idea of "White Guilt". But for the uninitiated it only confirms the idea of "evil Whitey" while the parody remains misunderstood. Good propaganda aims at the uninformed, simple mind and keeps its arguments simple, not sophisticated. The makers of this video should have tested it first with ordinary people to test their reaction.
Franklin Ryckaert said...
The makers of this video should have tested it first with ordinary people to test their reaction.
----------
Definitely. I'd also suggest that they canvas the opinions of people on blogs such as this for feedback on new projects. I'm sure these videos are quite time consuming to put together, so it's a great shame if they fizzle due to fundamental flaws with the basic concepts.
After all, it's not like they are doing some secret product launch and need to maintain secrecy before they spring it on the public.
Well, the video is out in the public,"being tested." lol So far it has 50,305 views in a week. We'll see if the viewing public gets it.
Wow, between the trayvon-mess to the National Review 'purges', what a crazy media-ride it has been this last month!
Just wanted to share this link in case anyone is interested in following this little drama, as it was Robert Weissberg who kicked off the Amren 2012 weekend with his speech essentially spelling out how, in his opinion, 'White Nationalism' is a political dead end, etc. I didn't care much for his flippant attitude regarding the fate of poor Whites (I believe he used the term 'rednecks') or for much of the content of his speech, although it did contain a few good bits sprinkled here n there.....
Anyways, this whole incident (jew Rich Lowry firing jew-sympathizer 'The Derb' and now firing jew Weissburg) reminded me of Tan showing us in his excellent "Israel-firsters" post how jews often conduct conversations about themselves between themselves right out in the open.
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2012/04/11/rich-lowry-takes-orders-from-left-robert-weissburg-purged-from-national-review/#comments
There is also a link on OD to an insightful article on Weissberg by Kevin MacDonald.
This man has no shame. He interposes between (strong) condemnations of the tactics Lowry et al use against "racists" a post using the same tactics against "the anti-semites."
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/022141.html
The famous jewish intellect at work, I guess.
Anyways, this whole incident (jew Rich Lowry firing jew-sympathizer 'The Derb' and now firing jew Weissburg) reminded me of Tan showing us in his excellent "Israel-firsters" post how jews often conduct conversations about themselves between themselves right out in the open.
Of course, by usual WN reasoning, this incident just proves that Weissberg and "The Derb" are really on our side, and are helping "get the word out", or else they wouldn't have been fired.
Of course, by usual WN reasoning, this incident just proves that Weissberg and "The Derb" are really on our side, and are helping "get the word out", or else they wouldn't have been fired.
Sorry? Who thinks that? The Derb is not on our side with his past pro-jewish articles and all. Of course he might have had a bit of a wake up call now.
And the event itself is a teachable moment.
Sorry? Who thinks that? The Derb is not on our side with his past pro-jewish articles and all.
Go read the commentary on pretty much any WN site.
Of course he might have had a bit of a wake up call now.
Has there ever been a case of one of these paleos actually waking up after one of these "wake up calls"? Like supposedly Pat Buchanan's gonna come out guns blazing now that he's been fired from MSNBC, but for some reason it hasn't happened yet. Guess what guys: your paleo heroes have known all along what's going on, and they don't give a shit.
Maybe the Derb made a calculation like this :
- On the one hand, I have mixed race children, I'm employed by Jews and I'm misleading people by telling them there is no Jewish problem.
- On the other hand, I educate people about the need to resist race replacement.
- On the whole, I'm much more help than a hindrance to the White race.
--
He gets on my nerves, but he is certainly helping the cause of White people.
@ Armor
"On the one hand, I educate people about the need to resist race replacement".
Pray tell, how could a man who has fathered two Eurasian children with a Chinese woman possibly "educate people about the need to resist race replacement"?
Speaking of sheep in wolf's clothing, here is Bonald, one of several writers supposedly working to restore traditionalist Christianity, at the Orthosphere:
http://orthosphere.org/2012/04/11/more-on-inferiority/
Of like kind is Bruce Charlton and Kristor. Caveat lector.
- On the other hand, I educate people about the need to resist race replacement.
- On the whole, I'm much more help than a hindrance to the White race.
We don't have to look past his recent Gawker interview to see that this is complete bullshit:
http://gawker.com/5900452/
As you can see from my IAT results, I bond effortlessly with East Asians & I think always have. I'm more at ease in a room full of Chinese people than I would be in a room full of black American rap artists. And my personal predilections aside, I think the big division in our society is always black-nonblack. The other stuff—Hispanics, Asians—is a bagatelle by comparison. This makes sense paleoanthropologically, too: Homo sap. first left Africa, then differentiated into other races
White, Hispanic, Asian... who gives a shit! As long as they're "non-black", it's all good!
Only a liar or a complete moron could say that "The Derb" "educates White people about the need to resist race replacement".
Go read the commentary on pretty much any WN site.
Not the ones Ive read recently and not AoT, obviously.
Guess what guys: your paleo heroes have known all along what's going on, and they don't give a shit.
I never said they were heroes, and I said he might have had a wake up call. And, well, it looks like he hasnt.
Rusty: I saw that thread at the Orthosphere. Bonald pulled another thread on Jews that started as a Gentile dog prostration before the Jewish superiority, which was grotesque in its false humility. I and a couple of others started taking issue with this false doctrine, and there's plenty of New Testament ammunition for what we were doing. Then *poof* goes the thread.
Tan (and readers), check out another good post re Jews at Vox Popoli today. Both post and Vox's comments refreshingly straightforward.
Speaking of sheep in wolf's clothing, here is Bonald, one of several writers supposedly working to restore traditionalist Christianity, at the Orthosphere:
http://orthosphere.org/2012/04/11/more-on-inferiority/
Of like kind is Bruce Charlton and Kristor. Caveat lector.
Wow, that Orthosphere site is really bad. Should be required reading for anyone who thinks Christianity is not among our biggest problems.
What goes round comes round. It has been proven...
Post a Comment
<< Home