Blog has moved, searching new blog...

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Iran So Far Away

The recent turmoil in Iran and our regime's reaction to it are of interest even to those of us who aren't much concerned which hostile alien runs a country full of hostile aliens on the other side of the planet.

For example, contrast the media's intense interest in iran with it's interest in the ongoing violence right next door. The Los Angeles Times has written about Mexico's Drug War, as have others. From their own occasional reports the situation is so out of control they can hardly ignore it. "Mexico Under Siege - The drug war at our doorstep", "It's a war. - Mexican President Felipe Calderon", writes the LAT. Yet despite the occasional splash of recognition nothing much else happens.

When will the regime show some sustained concern, and when will someone in the media ask Obama "what took you so long" to address the war next door, across a border you don't want to defend?

The answer is never. Or at least not until the regime is toppled.

Violent immigrant aliens, economic crisis, and an outbreak of disease all cause the regime to leap to the defense of the aliens. Meanwhile they officially recognize native Whites as their most feared enemy, even acknowledging that we're displeased by and reacting to their own behavior. What's lacking is a broader recognition of the strength and nature of this assault on Whites.

Much of the attention the media has directed toward iran has the curious effect of revealing their double standards on political rights and censorship. In iran we're told the "cracking down" on people trying to express themselves is a hallmark of totalitarianism and thuggery. Meanwhile at home in the West the same media plays an instrumental role in demonizing "racism" and "hate".

Attempted Iran media clampdown meets Internet age contains a typical example of the media's attitude toward iran:
CNN turned in part to the social-networking sites, broadcasting images posted on Facebook and Twitter, and explaining on-air that it was using "creativity" to cover a big event under government restrictions.

"We cannot verify readily some of this material that we're going to show you," correspondent David Mattingly warned viewers. Much of the material on Twitter is posted anonymously.

CNN spokeswoman Bridget Leininger said that adding context and explaining issues was necessary when reporting with such online sources. "We are committed to making the most information available in a tough news environment, while being totally transparent with the audience," she said.
Yes indeed they are committed to using "creativity" to get the word out about the events in an alien country. At home however they demonstrate a decided lack of interest in the squashing of White political free expression. The case of Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle for instance. The Mail's Race-hate Britons return to UK for sentencing is fairly typical of the sparse, unsympathetic coverage:
Two Britons who fled to the United States after they were accused of waging a campaign of hate against Jews and other minority groups appeared in front of a British court today after they were returned to the UK.

Simon Sheppard, 52, and Stephen Whittle, 42, were convicted of a number of race-hate crimes at Leeds Crown Court following two lengthy trials, the last of which finished in January.
The investigation into the men began when a complaint about a leaflet called 'Tales of the Holohoax' was reported to the police in 2004 after it was pushed through the door of a Synagogue in Blackpool.
Here we see evidence, and only after the outcome of the case has been locked down tight, of the single standard behind what only seems to be a double standard. They sing the praises of free expression so that someone, anyone, replaces Mr. Wipe Israel Off the Map, while mostly burying their own disgust with the free expression of Sheppard and Whittle. Whether with iran or the persecution of our own free speaking heretics, the regime is concerned primarily about what's best for jews. It's a rhetorical question, but Whose Country Is This Anyway?

Here's another example of the government and its media being on the same page:
In what appeared to be a coordinated exchange, President Obama called on the Huffington Post's Nico Pitney near the start of his press conference and requested a question directly about Iran.

“Nico, I know you and all across the Internet, we've been seeing a lot of reports coming out of Iran,” Obama said, addressing Pitney. “I know there may actually be questions from people in Iran who are communicating through the Internet. Do you have a question?”

Pitney, as if ignoring what Obama had just said, said: “I wanted to use this opportunity to ask you a question directly from an Iranian.”

He then noted that the site had solicited questions from people in the country “who were still courageous enough to be communicating online.”
Iranian aliens are able to ask questions of the US president. Iranian aliens are "courageous" to communicate online.
Reporters typically don’t coordinate their questions for the president before press conferences, so it seemed odd that Obama might have an idea what the question would be. Also, it was a departure from White House protocol by calling on The Huffington Post second, in between the AP and Reuters.
The media, the government, and jewish activists (specifically the SPLC) have most assuredly coordinated their own anti-White activities here at home.

Bonnie Erbe, a media heavyweight who just happens to be jewish, responded to an attack in which a single non-jew was killed by calling for the government to Round Up Hate-Promoters Now, Before Any More Holocaust Museum Attacks:
If yesterday's Holocaust Museum slaying of security guard and national hero Stephen Tyrone Johns is not a clarion call for banning hate speech, I don't know what is. Playwright Janet Langhart Cohen appeared on CNN yesterday right after the shooting, as she wrote a play that was supposed to have been debuted at the Holocaust Museum last night. Her play is about Emmett Till, whose lynching helped launch the Civil Rights Movement, and Ann Frank, whose diary told the story of Holocaust victims in hiding in the Netherlands during World War II.

She said something must be done about ridding the Internet and the public dialogue of hate speech. I agree.
The regime wants the internet open to iranian aliens (at least for now), and closed to "hate speakers". In fact silencing "hate" isn't enough. They want to "Round Up Hate-Promoters Now". Erbe's hysterical attitude reveals her own hate. The dishonest and hypocritical language of "hate" provides a politically correct way for jews to openly do themselves, from positions of power, what they constantly accuse powerless "haters" of wanting to do to them. They project their own thoughts onto others and then cry "hate!" It's disgusting as well as hateful.

Labels: , , , , , ,



Blogger who+dares+wings said...

The Whittle/Sheppard "Heretical Two" case came and went without a whimper. The MSM didn't go near it until it was over. I tried to get reporter/bloggers from my local media to discuss the ramifications of this test case of cyber free speech and was met with scorn. They couldn't get past the "hate" and on to the fact that nothing posted on the website hosted in Torrence, CA is illegal in the USA. Instead, these self-righteous scribblers just wanted to heap opprobrium on Whittle and Sheppard.

6/24/2009 06:38:00 PM  
Blogger Old Atlantic Lighthouse said...

Whittle/Sheppard is a frightening case. I find your experience Charles to be very interesting. Its important to keep one's blog downloaded on an up to date basis. Pagenest is a free website downloader.

6/24/2009 07:00:00 PM  
Anonymous Kronprinz Wilhelm said...


Check out this Kosher food fight between Apo and the mysterious "Andrei 'Andrea' Freiboden"!

*Me thinks it is finally dawning on Apo that 'Ms. Freebottom' is a dissimulating zionist drag queen.

6/26/2009 12:57:00 AM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

Thanks for the link. No comment.

6/26/2009 02:25:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

*9-11 to Tanstaafl*

6/26/2009 06:24:00 PM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

Control, halt, delete, an editorial from Financial Times regarding how much the chinese and iranian regimes have to learn about shaping opinion (link and emphasis added):

That stifling of web freedoms that many people around the world take for granted are being accompanied by more novel means of combating cyber opponents. Those methods range from directing stealthy technological attacks that shut down dissident websites to unleashing swarms of paid commentators to argue the government position on supposedly independent blogs.

Both carry the added attraction of deniability: many regimes are employing advanced repressive techniques that are hard to identify in action, let alone circumvent. At a time when new communication technologies, from text messaging to Twitter, promise to put greater power in the hands of the individual, these techniques are having a chilling effect. Internet experts from more open societies fear that this will lead to greater self-censorship by organisations and individuals, which they see as the most effective tool of all

6/27/2009 06:27:00 PM  
Blogger Old Atlantic Lighthouse said...

Friendly Daleks.

6/28/2009 05:48:00 AM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

I bought a copy of Joseph McCarthy's America's Retreat from Victory in a used bookstore today.

6/28/2009 12:44:00 PM  
Blogger Iranian For Aryans said...

My blog might be of interest.

7/02/2009 10:01:00 AM  
Blogger Robert said...

Rev. Manning on White Folk

7/03/2009 07:47:00 PM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

Nick Griffin's Maiden EU Speech, Nick Griffin Speaks, at Western Voices World News:

“I served as a monitor at commemorations for the 1956 Revolution in Budapest last year and I can confirm that Dr. Morvai is right to criticize those who fret about Iran while ignoring human rights abuses here in Europe,” Mr Griffin said.

“I trust that no Members of the ECRG here will be hypocritical enough to condemn Iran for the use of violence in elections, when David Cameron is among the sponsors of UAF, an organization of far-left criminals which routinely deploys intimidation and violence against nationalist dissidents in Britain,” he said

7/18/2009 08:01:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home