Symptoms of Hostility
In "Greenspan to testify on immigration" Steve Sailer wrote:The Open Boarders (sic) crowd isn't even trying to make sense these days, are they?My comment got lost/filtered:
In identifying them, "Genocidal Immigrationists" comes closer to the truth. For example, with that understanding of their intent, their nonsense makes perfect sense.When something doesn't make sense it's often because you're view is distorted or incomplete. But sometimes it's willful. Sailer himself likes to call attention to and ridicule this kind of willful ignorance, categorizing his observations under "political correctness makes you stupid".
Recognizing that many of the wealthy, intelligent, educated, and well-informed progressivist globalist administrators of the world actively perpetrate genocide and many more acquiesce to and abet it is apparently something Sailer finds too dangerous to permit his commentariat to try and deride or dispute.
Then again, maybe Blogger just dropped my comment.
- - -
There has been no substantial criticism of Genocidal Immigrationists, though the accusation is quite explicit. Beside the relatively light volume of visitors here I attribute this mainly to the accusation's validity. At best the most ardent supporters of mass immigration simply don't care who suffers the consequences, and at worst they intend them. Their justification usually hinges on claims that immigration is profitable overall. When they respond to those who object it is only to smear us as losers, haters, or some combination of the two - another sign of their bad faith and ill will.
I learned only recently from a post at Majority Rights titled ‘La Loi’ de Frédéric Bastiat that there's an old name for the mendacity I had long noticed genocidal immigrationists indulging in, particularly those of the economist persuasion. It's called the Broken Window Fallacy, which is the idea that any economic activity whatsoever is more desirable than none. For example, when our genocidalist administrators permit thousands of aliens to flood into our countries to the point that they overload our schools, hospitals, courts, prisons, housing, utilities and roads we shouldn't see that as bad. No, it's a wonderful boon. We're so very lucky because it means lots of jobs and increases the globalist economist's holiest of holies, the Gross Domestic Product. Never mind that the lives and efforts of some of our finest men and women end up flowing down a rat hole or into aiding those who hate us.
Globalism is in essence a world-scale pyramid scheme. It can only exist because the kind of economic wisdom contained in Bastiat's essay What Is Seen and What Is Not Seen has for too long not been seen.
- - -
In their initial responses to the Swine Flu various globalist mouthpieces again reveal their genocidal motivations, falling over themselves as they have not to calm the public, or to announce measures that would slow or blunt the impact of the outbreak. No. Instead their first reactions have been to announce loudly and clearly that closing borders and restricting travel would most definitely NOT happen - and that only xenophobes and nativist loser-haters who would think such measures might help. Of course if your main concern is continuing to flood the West with third worlders, then an outbreak of infectious disease isn't important to you except as a threat to trade and travel.
Here's one typical example from Monday:
Swine Flu Border Closures are Political, WHO Says
Travel restrictions under consideration by the U.S. to prevent the spread of a new flu virus may be influenced by politics more than science, the World Health Organization’s chief said today.
WHO doesn’t recommend closing borders or restricting the movement of people or goods, Margaret Chan, director-general of the United Nations agency told leaders from health groups around the world in a conference call today. The disease, which may have caused more than 100 deaths and sickened more than 1,000 people, has spread too far and would be impossible to contain by closing borders, she said.
“By definition, pandemic influenza will move around the world,” Chan said in the call today. “Does that mean we are going to close every country? Does that mean we are going to bring the world’s economy to a standstill?Note the numerous hysterical exaggerations. "Impossible to contain", "every country", "bring the world’s economy to a standstill". Note also the inversion in the headline. It is WHO who is driven by politics more than science. The fact is that the rate and extent of the spread of an epidemic is directly related to the frequency and intimacy of contact among people. Reducing interaction slows the rate of infection, stretching it over time, reducing the severity of the impact (so all the cops, firefighters, doctors, and nurses aren't sick at once) and making it more likely medicine can be produced and distributed.
“We know from past experience that transmission of influenza or the spread of new influenza disease would not be stopped by closing borders and would not be stopped by restricting movement of people or goods,” Chan said.
I don't think a world-class executive like Chan or her advisors fail to understand this. Instead it seems they are motivated by different priorities that override any such understanding.
Travel to Asia plunged during in the 2002-2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory disease, or SARS.Calling 2002-2003 "the old days" and claiming the SARS outbreak is "totally different" is a transparently lame attempt to deny that closing borders and reducing travel might help. "Who cares how many people die", seems to be the thinking.
SARS, which killed 770 people, reduced passenger air traffic 19 percent in Asia and 8.2 percent worldwide. Malaysia shut its borders to travelers from China and Hong Kong, and other countries instituted health checks at airports and borders. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention discouraged travel to some affected countries and said it might screen travelers in a bird flu epidemic.
“When we talk about travel advisories, we cannot think of the old days when we were dealing with SARS,” Chan said today. “It’s a totally different ballgame now.”
- - -
Contrast the current reaction with the reaction of the US government in 1976 to a single death from Swine Flu. Advisors feared a pandemic because "[t]he virus isolated at Fort Dix is antigenically related to the influenza virus which has been implicated as the cause of the 1918-1919 pandemic which killed 450,000—more than 400 out of every 100,000 Americans":
Then President Ford, on the same March 24, 1976, only one day after his surprise loss to Ronald Reagan in the North Carolina Republican presidential primary, announced on national television his recommendation to the American public for a crash nation-wide influenza vaccination program to include “every man, woman and child.” Congress responded promptly to the president’s call for funds (appropriations were voted by the Senate April 9, by the House April 12, and signed into law April 15, 1976). Vaccine was produced, field tested, and evaluated in April, May and June. There were problems with producing the vaccine. Nevertheless, between October 1 and December 16, 1976, the U.S. Public Health Service, through state and local public health department “public sector providers,” rapidly spread out among the citizenry to successfully vaccinate 85% of 40 million voluntary vaccinees in 10 weeks (the other 15% of the 40 million voluntary vaccinees received their vaccinations from “private sector providers”).It seems we're heading for something closer to a repeat of 1918 than 1976.
- - -
This morning I was listening to NPR and was quite surprised to hear the commentator declare that the common thread in the outbreak so far was a connection to Mexico.
A minute later they mentioned that the israeli health minister found the word swine offensive to jews and muslims and suggested calling it mexican flu instead, which offended mexicans. That made me laugh quite a bit, though I sobered up when I realized it's only a matter of time before the selfless advocates for all "people of color" decide to call it White flu and blame blue-eyed people for engineering it. Nobody will care if that causes us any offense.
- - -
In "Swine flu" Sailer writes:
Some people are puzzled as to how human, pig, and bird strains of the flu have mixed together, but if you have spent any time in rural Mexico the answer is obvious: these creatures all live together in close quarters.Commenter El Caudillo quotes this and suggests a more accurate term would be mestizo flu. I didn't bother testing if Sailer would permit a comment suggesting genocidal globalist flu is even more accurate. Ben Tillman said as much in a subtle way:
It's the evolution of virulence through horizontal transmission. Immigration policy is designed to foster such increased virulence.Indeed, that's the science of it. Obviously the politics are instead driven by what is financially and biologically profitable for the mendacious few at the tip of the pyramid. The rest of us be damned.
Labels: economy, genocide, globalism, immigration, mexiflu, steve sailer
posted by Tanstaafl at 4/29/2009 11:35:00 AM
65 Comments:
Recognizing that many of the wealthy, intelligent, educated, and well-informed progressivist globalist administrators of the world actively perpetrate genocide and many more acquiesce to and abet it is apparently something Sailer finds too dangerous to permit his commentariat to try and deride or dispute.Sailer is moving up in the world, and open and honest discussion of the Jewish Question would tend to interfere with that. Anything beyond noting that an "Israel Lobby" might have a slightly undue sway in the halls of power is forbidden. I had something like a dozen posts censored at his site - none of them inflammatory - and now accept that Sailer, who once was comfortable with a fairly open discussion of real political effects of HBD in European history and politics, is jettisoning people who know the score as ballast, as his balloon ascends.
Other people have made this tactical decision, Jared Taylor among them. What people like ourselves might have to acknowledge is that the truth about HBD might be so upsetting and difficult to ordinary persons that it can't be combined with the JQ.
Also, real discussion of the JQ is a guarantee that whoever speaks of it will become a pariah. That's a heavy toll - politically, economically, psychologically. Anyone associated with someone who speaks openly and accurately about the JQ likewise becomes tainted.
I can't count the number of times I've been taunted and jeered - on friendly boards as well as unfriendly - with "so you're saying the Jews are superhuman?" or "If Jews are so powerful, then don't they have the right to rule us?" etc. There's no real response to this in the present day. It is true that there is nothing - nothing at all - in the human record, whether of history or literature - that could prepare the mind for understanding the degree and scope of Jewish power over not just finance and media - but even over the private decision making and cognitive processes of their victims.
Sailer and Taylor are living proof that - even as they claim to be 'agnostics' over the JQ, or that all this is merely about American support for Israel - there is only one power on earth before which every knee must bow. In my opinion, Sailer should quietly remove "Live not by lies" from his site. It's not a motto he's entitled to. Not to say that his work isn't incredibly valuable - it is - but he himself is a propagator and collaborator with the One Big Lie.
Indeed, by trimming his sails on the JQ, he might find that the path is cleared for him into the world of prestige journalism. And I can't say that wouldn't be a good thing. Only that he is no longer entitled to use the Solzenitsyn quote as a motto.
Sailer is smart. He knows who you meant by 'genocidal immigrationists'. That's why your comment didn't appear.
There has been no substantial criticism of Genocidal Immigrationists, though the accusation is quite explicit. Beside the relatively light volume of visitors here I attribute this mainly to the accusation's validity. Regarding the paucity of visitors here:
a)White type on black background. Very difficult to read. Unpleasant enough to impede concentration on the writing.
b)Infrequent posting. People visit sites frequently that update frequently. I realize that your lengthier posts are going to take more time to prepare than shorter items, but even so your posting rate and readership are tied together in a way that's perfectly normal in the blogosphere.
c)Trolls/ the mentally defective. If you're going to allow Apollonian to post here, you can't blame the people you want to read your blog and comment on it for staying away. This problem is endemic to our end of the web. Your primary feeder site, Majority Rights, is similarly afflicted. What should be the standard bearer for our collective efforts is maybe one/ one-thousandth what it might have been if its owner had not decided before hand on an open door policy for every variety of troll and mental defective on the web. The talented and influential people who he needed to attract and promote discussion between all eventually left. I drop in occasionally and post from time to time, but it's all pretty listless and halfhearted.
Every site I have been deeply engaged in - Original Dissent, Phora, Majority Rights - has been destroyed by trolls and mental defectives. No amount of begging, cajoling, threatening, admonishing, cursing, pleading or any variation thereof has ever served to move any of those admins a single step closer to sanity in the matter of hygiene in association.
This situation eventually did in plenty of other sites that I was not involved in. Alex Linder's association with Bill White - with full knowledge in advance that he was batshit insane - and a host of other moral cretins eventually reduced his site, once the best of the web, to nothing at all.
A word to the wise, &c.
At best the most ardent supporters of mass immigration simply don't care who suffers the consequences, and at worst they intend them.Our opponents know exactly what they're doing. They don't correctly anticipate what might come out of it, but their intent is malignant, you may count on it.
“By definition, pandemic influenza will move around the world,” Chan said in the call today. “Does that mean we are going to close every country? Does that mean we are going to bring the world’s economy to a standstill?It's very instructive to note when 'the economy' is sacrosanct and when it can't be considered.
In the face of 'social justice' or 'saving our planet', the health of the economy isn't even allowed in the room.
When it's a matter of possibly showing the rubes how easy it is to actually close a border, the economy becomes a paramount concern.
As Alex Linder once wisely observed: "There is no longer any politics of any kind in the United States or even the world. There is only the Jewish Question."
1. Colin, you should start a blog. It would be a regular destination for me and many others. If you could get il ragno to post there as well...wow. Put it on blogspot, but make sure to back up your posts regularly to avoid the problems which afflicted zasucks.com.
Intro post on Esau's Tears, maybe?
2. There is value in maintaining an archipelago of sites which grade from Hannity to Ace of Spades to Steve Sailer to Age of Treason to Kevin Macdonald. You can't deprogram people all at once. Start by showing that communism is bad, move to showing that Republicans are soft democrats, then follow with HBD, and finally with the JQ.
As you know, people at different points in that archipelago are taking grave risks if you force them to publicly choose between their friends/career and letting unfiltered comments from their right through. Steve Sailer's whole career is based on making people understand that truth need not be "racist". You need that message to get out there and get absorbed before you hit them with the 200-proof stuff.
3. If you don't respect the need for this archipelago, this gradualism, you will be stuck in a fratricidal game. You will force Sailer to condemn you and distance himself from you, and then you will spend a lot of your cycles attacking Sailer rather than the real enemies, who are on the other side of the archipelago.
4. Tanstaafl's takedown of Auster is kind of like this. I'm not disagreeing with anything Tan wrote, just the emphasis. Of course once you really wake up you realize that Auster is J**ish, and this colors his opinions and how far he can go on issues. Why not leave him as another island, recognizing that he is helping to move the frame rightward, and also recognizing that he can be dealt with if and when the time comes?
5. Relatedly, it would be worthwhile to come up with a few undeniable pragmatic slogans. Kill your TV is excellent. "Name the J**" is a bit harsh for just about any ears other than the convert. What about "Google the ethnicity" instead? It's like using "copulate" rather than "fuck" -- you can get the message across yet the intellectual effort required to decode the embedded crimethink also takes some of the visceral edge away.
6. I personally think the best tactic is to obey the rules (written and unwritten) of site proprietors, but to maintain a link in your name back to your own site where you "let your hair down". Let people learn privately without being publicly forced to choose sides -- especially early in the process when they are not yet convinced that you are right.
7. > It is true that there is nothing - nothing at all - in the human record, whether of history or literature - that could prepare the mind for understanding the degree and scope
I think the first Matrix movie is actually a very good analogy (let us not speak of the latter two).
There is a qualitative difference between Sailer and Auster.
Sailer filters some comments, and I concur with Colin's take on that. Sailer doesn't smear those with whom he disagrees or who pursue the truth farther than he himself is willing to go. He provides valuable exposure for important ideas.
Auster is an absolute control freak. He's also a charlatan and poseur who expends a great deal of effort smearing and trying to silence anyone who sees the very busy jews behind the "liberal" curtain he deliberately tries to disguise them with. He eventually alienates almost everyone he comes into contact with, showing an uncanny knack for sowing discord and controversy. He is not at all on our side, and his faux-White dissimulation is more pernicious than the overt activity of a plain enemy.
Any pro-White who has a problem with my treatment of Auster should have an even bigger problem with Auster's attacks on Sailer, MacDonald, Buchanan, Taylor, Derbyshire, Duke, Majority Rights, etc. ad nauseum. It's not clear to me who or what I'm harming beyond Auster's influence over confused Whites. And I do
hope I have harmed that.
Tan, all points taken. Auster is a scrub. Your takedowns are worthwhile, though they give him attention. All I'm saying is that your posting is infrequent enough that it'd be great to see you take on other matters *as well*. 10 posts a month and 1 on auster, ok. 2 post a month and 1 on auster, less desirable :)
Some good points by Colin. I don't like the white font on black background either.
Nothing frustrates me more than Guessedworker's insane commenting\moderation policy. As former Majority Rights blogger Steve Edwards has said, GW is a very talented blogger and an awful website administrator. He drove away his most interesting blogger, JW Holliday, with his open door policy. And it's not just Holliday and wintermute that MR has lost. Go back and read almost any post from 2005 or 2006 (minus the JJR posts). The quality of the commenting was light-years better then than it is now. It's a sad story.
@Tanstaafl:
I have been a lurker here for more than half a year. When I discovered your site for the first time, I spent hours reading older posts and all the comments, I learnt a lot from it. Your posts and comments are very valuable to me, please keep up the good work.
@Colin Laney:
Can you tell me what "HBD" means? I couldn't figure it out on my own. I looked it up on Wikipedia, Metapedia, the MajorityRights Wiki and in an Acronym dictionary, without success.
I have this problem too often on sites about WN, JQ etc., that people use acronyms and I can't find their explanation anywhere nearby. This is quite frustrating. These things should be explained on a Wiki of our own, like Metapedia or MR's wiki, but at the moment these contain just too few article. Actually it would be best, if there was only one WN Wikipedia instead of many, as it would serve as a standard reference for us.
(Stormfront is supposed to have a Wiki, too, but I can't even find it. :( )
Perhaps we should go for the twofer and call it Mexican swine flu?
lurker
HBD - Human Bio-Diversity.
Agreed about white type/black background, just reverse it.
MR - JWH did storm off in a huff and start his own blog, but then he went invite only - why, I dont know. In blogging terms thats death, a defeat.
Freedom of speech is all very well but allowing Silver to keep commenting at the price of losing JWH doesnt quite add up I have to say.
JWH wasnt happy having comments at all at MR, yet they are, or can be, one of the greatest strengths of a site. Ideally weak ideas are killed off, weak arguments strengthened or abandoned. Of course if the noise/signal ratio is bad - too many trolls & defectives that may not apply.
The following blog needs a much wider audience in the race realist/White nationalist movement - http://freiboden.blogspot.com/
If you can, spread the word, comment there, etc.
@Anonymous:
Thank you for the explanation.
Colin Laney: "there is only one power on earth before which every knee must bow."
Read - http://freiboden.blogspot.com/2009/04/law-of-compensation-regarding.html
"It seems we're heading for something closer to a repeat of 1918 than 1976."
There's a side of me that wonders whether this is a bad thing...
Since theyre commenting on web page admin - black/white doesnt impact me either way; but your recent comments could detail what entry it is from ala MR.
I thought JWH's nickname for Sailer - "Breezy Steve" - fit to a T. It's a shame he shut down his blog. It was always a good read and chock full of interesting information.
More symptoms of hostility.
This is from the 24th, three days earlier than the WHO statement quoted in the original post. I provide it as further evidence that hostility for the citizenry is pandemic in the ruling class. CDC says too late to contain U.S. flu outbreak:
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said on Friday it was too late to contain the swine flu outbreak in the United States.
CDC acting director Dr. Richard Besser told reporters in a telephone briefing it was likely too late to try to contain the outbreak, by vaccinating, treating or isolating people.
"There are things that we see that suggest that containment is not very likely," he said.
Things he's seeing. Like phone calls and emails telling him he'd better set disease control aside and focus on what's really important: ensuring nothing threatens mexican colonization of the US.
This is from the 29th, World takes drastic steps to contain swine flu:
From Egypt's order that all 300,000 pigs in the country be slaughtered to travel bans and putting the kibosh on kissing, the world is taking drastic - and some say debatable - measures to combat swine flu.
Egypt ordered the pig slaughter even though there hasn't been a single case of swine flu there and no evidence that pigs have spread the disease. Britain, with only five cases, is trying to buy 32 million masks. And in the United States, President Barack Obama said more of the country's 132,000 schools may have to be shuttered.
At airports from Japan to South Korea to Greece and Turkey, thermal cameras were trained on airline passengers to see if any were feverish. And Lebanon discouraged traditional Arab peck-on-the-cheek greetings, even though no one has come down with the virus there.
. . .
"WHO does not recommend closing of borders and does not recommend restrictions of travel," said Dr. Keiji Fukuda, the Geneva-based organization's flu chief. "From an international perspective, closing borders or restricting travel would have very little effect, if any effect at all, at stopping the movement of this virus."
The world is not listening to the CDC or WHO. Or just maybe they realize that stopping the spread of the mexican flu isn't the point. Slowing it down is.
The WHO said closing schools and public places, along with banning or restricting mass gatherings, can be a way to contain the spread of disease. Epidemiologists call it "social distancing," and the idea is simple: If you keep people who have the virus away from others, you can stop the chain of transmission.
"That's a technique we would be recommending in a pandemic," said WHO's Thompson. "We would recommend it to nations as a useful technique to be applied given the special circumstances of each nation."
Right. When the news first broke the special circumstances were that the infection was contained to mexico. Thus WHO should have been recommending each nation close its borders to travel to and from mexico. Instead the first thing WHO did was say that shouldn't be done.
From the 30th, WHO raises flu threat level, warns pandemic imminent:
"Influenza pandemics must be taken seriously precisely because of their capacity to spread rapidly to every country in the world," WHO Director General Margaret Chan told a news conference in Geneva as she raised the official alert level to phase 5, the last step before a pandemic. [nLT672274]
"The biggest question is this: how severe will the pandemic be, especially now at the start," Chan said. But she added that the world "is better prepared for an influenza pandemic than at any time in history."
Oh please. You already tipped your hand Chan. You and the other genocidal globalists think the biggest question is: how can we protect The Holy Global Economy? If and when you start recommending totalitarian isolation and quarantines, it will be for the same reason.
Already in Mexico City, a metropolis of 20 million, all schools, restaurants, nightclubs and public events have been shut down to try to stop the sickness from spreading, bringing normal life to a virtual standstill.
Even the mexicans are smart enough to quarantine themselves from mexicans.
President Barack Obama said during an evening news conference at the White House there was no need for panic and rejected the possibility of closing the border with Mexico.
"At this point, (health officials) have not recommended a border closing," he said. "From their perspective, it would be akin to closing the barn door after the horses are out, because we already have cases here in the United States."
Uh huh. And we sure wouldn't want to close the door after 30 million horses walked out. Ever heard of an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure? Or, better late than never? Or how about, a mexican deported in time saves nine (Americans).
What's causing me to panic isn't the pandemic. It's the realization that even in the face of a pandemic, with thousands if not millions of lives in the balance, the genocidal globalists will say and do anything, absolutely anything, to keep their global pyramid scheme cooking on full boil just one more day.
Again, when it comes to presidential precedents, we see Nixon secured the border with the life of a single man (and indirectly his lawmen comrades and law and order itself) in the balance:
On February 7, 1985, Camarena was kidnapped in broad daylight within a block of the American consulate in Guadalajara. U.S. Ambassador John Gavin, aware that another DEA agent had disappeared several months earlier, immediately demanded that the Mexican authorities take action to find Camarena. The Mexican police claimed they saw no cause for alarm. Gavin became more insistent as the days went by. But though Gavin's position was perfectly reasonable, given that American DEA officials work in Mexico with the Mexican government's full consent, his request for help for Camarena seemed only to annoy the relevant Mexican officials.
Operation Camarena
IN THE FACE of Mexican resistance, Washington ordered "Operation Camarena" all along the Mexican border. Every car entering the United States was meticulously searched for the DEA agent, dead or alive, so that the crossing, which usually takes five minutes, took five hours. Travelers fumed, radiators boiled, and business on both sides of the border was throttled for more than a week.
The problem today is that Obama, like Bush, considers himself just as much president of mexico. Thus calls to close the border seem only to annoy our banana-republicized officials.
WHO warns flu pandemic imminent is more of the same. But this quote was precious:
"I'm depressed. I don't understand where this came from, how it spreads, how long it will last or what it will to the economy," said an elderly woman named Licha, sitting on a Mexico City park bench and wearing a surgical mask.
What are elderly mexican women in flu ground zero fretting about? The Holy Global Economy. Talk about panic. Could the globalist media's brainwashing get any more thorough?
Biden: Stay Off Subways During Swine Flu Panic:
"I would tell members of my family, and I have, I wouldn't go anywhere in confined places now. It's not that it's going to Mexico, it's you're in a confined aircraft when one person sneezes it goes all the way through the aircraft. That's me. I would not be, at this point, if they had another way of transportation suggesting they ride the subway. "
The vice president also implied that schools should be closed as the threat of swine flu increases.
Open mouth insert foot:
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs issued an apology Thursday for Vice President Joe Biden’s comments that he wouldn’t recommend taking a commercial flight or riding in a subway car because swine flu virus can spread in confined places.
“Obviously, if anybody was unduly alarmed for whatever reason, we would apologize for that. And I hope that my remarks and remarks of people at CDC and Secretary Napolitano have appropriately cleared up what he meant to say,” Gibbs said during the daily briefing at the White House.
The only people alarmed by Joe's otherwise unremarkable remarks are the ones who view any crimp in travel or trade resulting in an intolerable reduction in their income. Well, and the genocidal immigrationists, who as Colin described, would prefer we not see just how easily the border could be closed and just how little impact that would actually have on most of our lives - beyond potentially saving them that is.
Tan's coverage of Auster was instrumental in my journey of awareness regarding Jewish malfeasance. Having grown up with an ultra pro-Israel and pro-Jew Dad, I later became a long-time neoconned conservative, even regularly reading the Weekly Standard way back when. Over time I started to have more exposure to paleoconservatives, like Joe Sobran (who gave me a different view of Israel and the Jews), over the internet and eventually started reading Auster, who seemed to be a strong defender of Whites. In some ways Auster does defend Whites and traditional culture quite well, and he certainly is an intelligent, perceptive man with excellent writing skills.
At some point he was complaining about anti-Semites and was going off on Tan, so I checked out Tan's blog. I was just stunned to read how brilliantly Tan dissected Auster's arguments, his inconsistencies and his intellectual dishonesty in refusing to deal with legitimate questions about Jewish behavior and influence. And I thought how disgraceful that Auster wouldn't deal with these very compelling points honestly instead of slandering his critic.
I think Tan really has Auster's number and just relentlessly shreds Auster's real agenda, obfuscations and blind spots. To the best of my knowledge, Tan is by far the best Auster critic on the web.
I think when you read Auster for a while and you observe some of the unpleasant aspects of his personality, like his absolute obsession with controlling all dialog on his site and even having critical comments censored from other people's sites, or his repeated sleazy publication of private emails, or his baiting games he plays with people, you see the guy has a bit of "strong" personality. He's a bit of a special case. I think part of Larry's difficulty in dealing straightforwardly with Jewish malfeasance is sincere in its own twisted way, in that he doesn't see any intellectual problem with ignoring certain arguments because he thinks their proponents are beyond the pale. And this aspect of Jewish psychology might be somewhat widespread, where they don't value free speech or dissent nearly as much as Whites, at least when it threatens Jewish interests. Yeeha for doing it to Whites though.
I'm all for Tan continuing to apply is deep knowledge of Auster's work with his incisive commentary to give him the critique is badly needs, at least so more Whites can understand Auster's limitations as they read his stuff. I think when you inoculate yourself to his weaknesses, you can still find plenty of value on VFR. As Anonymous pointed out (and as I've discussed in other places), we need many different nodes in the White advocacy network, covering a broad range of views, including those that handle the Jewish Question unabashedly and those that just lightly open space up to ask a few mild questions, since a critical process is for us to awaken the broader population of Whites that have grown up within a stifling and pervasive miasma of pro-Jewish propaganda.
By the way Anonymous, that was a great comment. You should consider choosing some identifiable handle so your comments can be traced more easily, and maybe start your own blog, or at least find some online home where you might contribute more systematically.
Anonymous,
I probably wouldn't go so far as to call for no comments section like JWH did. But it's clearly preferable to an open, completely unmoderated comments section. The Golden Mean would be somewhere in between those two extremes, with trolls, mental defectives, and dullards excluded as a matter of course.
Ideally, you'd also want to do a better job regulating screening your bloggers, to prevent people like JJR, Richards, Diamed, and Hoffmeister from assuming a prominent position.
I much appreciate hearing your story ScotchFiend. It's people like yourself I have hoped to reach by dissecting Auster. You made my day.
I think Tan really has Auster's number and just relentlessly shreds Auster's real agenda, obfuscations and blind spots.
That's why Auster so often neglects to link here when he's railing about something I've written. Still, his vanity google alert let's him know whenever I say something about him. That'll do.
Here for instance we see him once again wearing his self-assigned "fifth columnist" number like a badge of honor, projecting onto me his own state of "constant alert".
50% of what I do vis-a-vis Auster is apply his own logic to himself and jews. The other 50% is applying his logic (or, more often, noting his deviation from it) to defend myself from his hysterical response to the first 50%. It's pure Auster. And he can't stand himself.
In Conflicting messages, Vanishing American provides her usual reasonable, skeptical take on the current mexican fluhaha, and links here.
VA opines on much of the same "liberal" grist Auster does, but from a pro-White rather than pro-jew basis.
Q&A: Swine flu: Is SARS a guide for the economic impact? | Health | Reuters, published on the 27th, reflects the ruling class' obsession with the Holy Global Economy. It's a story, filed under Health, whose concern is primarily economic health. And apparently Reuters didn't get Chan's memo that SARS happened in the "old days", that it's a "totally different ballgame" with the mexican flu.
Though SARS only had a negligible impact on the Holy Global Economy, it did break a few windows:
Hong Kong's government announced a package of measures worth around 1 percent of GDP, which included tax reductions and loan guarantees. Singapore likewise had a SARS relief package including measures for airlines. It also eased monetary policy in July 2003 by a one-off devaluation of the currency. Malaysia's package was close to 2 percent of GDP and included cheaper loans, support for job training and tourism sectors.
By golly, with the help of facemask manufacturers and their undocumented American workers we can lift ourselves up by our own facemask straps!
Nothing to see here...move along, move along; Whites are definitely not in danger of being swamped by non-Whites in their own countries...that's just NONSENSE! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cf31q4TC790
I was talking to a turkish woman last year. When she detected I wasn't like the rest of the PC lemmings in SoCal she confided in me that her and and her turkish husband were really disturbed by the number of mexicans. She and hubby had migrated to America to live among (White) Americans! Poor migrants. They recreate what they're trying to escape, making everyone else (except the genocidal immigrationists) miserable in the process.
Here's a comment from that video that well reflects the twisted arguments of genocidal immigrationists:
Fear of the foreign is as old as man himself. The fear is understandable when the pace of change is rapid as it is today. But the idea that there is one Irish or British "culture " is a misnomer. Culture evolves and changes. Race is the one distinguishing feature that allowed for easy labelling. The only reason that there are Europeans is that non-Europeans exist. An arbitary line on a map defines people- what tosh. Likewise there are Hetrosexuals only COZ there are Homosexuals ! Go figure -
There are heteros only thanks to homos? Think about what kind of brain it must take to so flagrantly invert reality like that. Without heterosexuals "culture" and "arbitrary lines on maps" and everything else people produce would disappear in a single generation.
The Euro/non-Euro point isn't at all an inversion. It's a call to ignore the immigration invasion. To ignore the consequences. Clearly the non-Whites flooding across our borders are swamping Whites. They like the idea that Whites will disappear and only non-Whites will remain. Thus they absurdly try to diminish the significance of the "arbitrary lines on a map" that formed exactly out of the will to keep back such a flood. We didn't lose our will. We've been betrayed by greedy, treasonous, genocidal maniacs.
As for fear, let's be honest: Whites do fear what's happening. Let the maniacs and non-Whites be honest too. They fear our fear. They fear the maniacs will lose control and we'll expel them and their interloping guests. Even the maniacs and non-Whites fear living amongst non-Whites. They fear all of this so much they will imprison or kill any who oppose them.
Sailer, who once was comfortable with a fairly open discussion of real political effects of HBD in European history and politics, is jettisoning people who know the score as ballast, as his balloon ascends.-C. Laney
Sailer is somewhat like Dennis Mangan that way. On a thread at Mangan's regarding jews I walked on eggshells to be polite (far more so than was deserved) in my criticism of the jews. Poof! It was gone. What a coward. I'm so sick of these cowards.
They profess to care what happens to our countries and people but won't address a large part of the problem. They are easy money racialists and no concerned white should tolerate such waffling.
I understand Sailer and Mangan are real-name posters, unlike me, and that of course they are risking more than we anonymous types are. But ultimately there is a limit to the effectiveness of their critiques when they obstinately refuse to address, for example, the JQ. How much can you truly alter in terms of "hearts and minds" when you can see the reality of the situation but not have the guts to name who's responsible?
---Colin Laney: "there is only one power on earth before which every knee must bow."
Read - http://freiboden.blogspot.com/2009/04/law-of-compensation-regarding.html---
----
To All Who Care For The Truth:
Be VERY AWARE about this "Freiboden" site!
Aside from the Germanic-sounding surname, and some very interesting--or, more accurately, entertaining--commentary (largely telling, in an Elizabeth Wurtzel, Prozac Nation kind of way what many of us already know), this ostensible White female really is very foul-mouthed and EXTREMELY long-winded.
Again, whoever this person, and their motives, actually are, the attacks on White men are gratuituous and condescending, and can be very demoralizing, however dressed up they may be (ex.-'telling it like it is'), potentially as a cover.
Also a little strange how this site seems to 'advertise': often by some 'anonymous' poster on all other sites saying to 'check out' this really great site (just like here).
The last thing we need is another Judas Goat (for those among the WN crowd) pretending to be a 'friend'.
So, beware, of "G-r-eeks bearing 'Gifts"
Nothing frustrates me more than Guessedworker's insane commenting\moderation policy. As former Majority Rights blogger Steve Edwards has said, GW is a very talented blogger and an awful website administrator. He drove away his most interesting blogger, JW Holliday, with his open door policy.-Anonymous
More accurately, GW allowing silver to constantly hector JW Holliday is what drove him away. Don't believe me? See for yourself.Btw there have been tons of trolls allowed at MR. I don't know what GW is thinking.
Thing is, I like and respect GW. To me he seems like a decent, thoughtful fellow. His posts and James Bowery's are still worth reading. But he ought to moderate his site - indeed, he ought to have been doing it for some time.
I don't post there myself because the commentariat there seems to talk much but listen little. It's like the place has become an echo chamber. Not that you don't hear some interesting perspectives now and again, but there's a general aura of arrogance that is off-putting.
Still, it's lame that Holliday threw a fit and closed Western Biopolitics as well. He should at least make the archives public, for goodness' sake. No one else has even come close to that prolific level of output vis-a-vis Salter. I guess he's trying to make a point or something, but it seems puerile.
Fear of the foreign is as old as man himself. The fear is understandable when the pace of change is rapid as it is today. But the idea that there is one Irish or British "culture " is a misnomer. Culture evolves and changes. Race is the one distinguishing feature that allowed for easy labelling. The only reason that there are Europeans is that non-Europeans exist. An arbitary line on a map defines people- what tosh. Likewise there are Hetrosexuals only COZ there are Homosexuals ! Go figure.
-from Tanstaafl's quote
If that isn't a prime example of virulent, biotoxic extended-Jewish-phenotypia, then I don't know what is.
Thing is, I like and respect GW. To me he seems like a decent, thoughtful fellow.
Agree completely. As I said in a prior comment, I think he's a fine blogger. It's his administration of MR that leaves much to be desired.
And for the record, I'm not blaming GW for JWH shutting down his blog. JWH is an excellent thinker, but he's too easily riled.
What people like ourselves might have to acknowledge is that the truth about HBD might be so upsetting and difficult to ordinary persons that it can't be combined with the JQ.
I think there's some wisdom in this. Attack one taboo at a time. Bringing in a second taboo issue before the first has been demolished can upset your interlocutor and undo the progress you've made.
Re Freiboden, I've always liked Guessedworker's approach whereby he treats ambiguous cases as potential allies who may simply need some guidance. And offers it. Looking back on how my thinking has changed, I know what might have seemed to someone else like warning signs were plain ignorance and the hard-to-shake habits of a lifetime of deracinated philo-semitism. I just assume now that I have even more to learn. Thus I appreciate when someone shares warnings and wisdom.
If you are following the thread at Majority rights about the articles attacking Fred Scooby, I would appreciate your input.
Something is going on there that I don't like.
I’m a Brit, and Steve Sailer’s site helped me move away from the Brussels-Journal-esque rut of focusing merely on ‘culture’ and Islamisation and even towards daring to criticise the Israel lobby, so I should thank him for that. I just hope others who happen upon his site use it as a stepping-stone. (I mean once you’ve got over the shock of someone talking sense about racial differences, how many more posts analyzing sports statistics do you need to read?)
AmRen helped, but it was MR that really opened my eyes to the simple fact that we Europeans have been targeted for elimination.
As for J Richards latest post, I'm baffled, and I think it likely to scare many a newcomer away, like much of his output. (Then again, a site that tells the truth about “The Holy H” is not one for the politically naïve.) I do wonder about a person who calls David Duke a Zionist while praising Eric Hufschmid.
Btw Tanstaafl, I think your analysis of Auster is spot-on. I say this as someone who’s wasted far too much time at VFR in the past.
One more thing – I have heard that Taylor is well aware of the JQ. Taylor clearly cares about the future of our people; I’m not sure Sailer does.
-- pryderi --
"Again, whoever this person, and their motives, actually are, the attacks on White men are gratuituous and condescending, and can be very demoralizing, however dressed up they may be (ex.-'telling it like it is'), potentially as a cover."
All white nationalist females take that line; the same line taken by every other female these days. Men need to be more like men (daddy). Best to ignore these females, go about our business. Never look for ideological contributions from women. That's why we exist; if they're not having you're kids and keeping them away from groids while you're at work, they're corrupt.
As for J Richards latest post, I'm baffled, and I think it likely to scare many a newcomer away, like much of his output. (Then again, a site that tells the truth about “The Holy H” is not one for the politically naïve.) I do wonder about a person who calls David Duke a Zionist while praising Eric Hufschmid.
I very much enjoyed Richards post attacking Alon Ziv, but I find most of his output to be unhelpful at best.
More on Richards: http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/cosmic_ants_and_a_few_fragmentary_thoughts_in_answer_to_maguire/
Look in particular at the posts by "reader" in that thread.
Some disturbing stuff there.
Better link:
http://tinyurl.com/dezf7c
"Disturbing" is the wrong word. More like "eye-opening".
Most everything J. Richards writes comes across as bizarre and off-putting to me.
Cosmic ants and a few fragmentary thoughts in answer to maguire, on the other hand, represents MR at its very finest. Valuable information and constructive debate from a variety of minds (Richards being a notable exception) I truly sense I share common cause with.
Wow, Mangan was insulted enough by my above comments that he posted them on his blog, plus some retaliatory invective.
It's the little guys that have something to lose.-Mangan
Actually it is the pusillanimous bourgeoisie typified by the likes of Mangan that have something to lose. I have nothing of consequence to lose, yet. But that doesn't mean that anonymity isn't the best option for now.
As for the anti-Semites, they think that they have all the answers - or rather, the answer - and hurl deprecations from behind their pseudonyms at anyone who dissents.-Mangan
As for the anti-anti-Semites, they know that their criticism of the status quo is impotent and toothless, and that their politically-incorrect posturing will not change anything.
They spend their time cultivating a gentlemanly outward appearance and mostly try to ensure that the paychecks keep rolling in. They run to stand still, these clowns.
Please, Mangan. You know damn well which parties you can't criticize. That's clear in the way you behave.
Come on over to Shalmaneser's Place and see my even more ad hominem but nevertheless substantially correct denunciation of Good Old Dennis. Nothing personal regarding Dennis, he's merely indicative of a larger problem.
I'm definitely prompted by vanity, or otherwise I would have shut the hell up. ;-).
Despite my gripe about Sailer in the post I can understand why he censors things. I don't attribute it to cowardice, or a hidden agenda, or his being part jewish. I attribute it to a desire to not be an extremist, to not wanting to be marginalized by being accused of associating with or providing a platform for extremists. Despite this he has been more outspoken for far longer and more effectively on race differences, immigration, and jewish influence than I have. Thus I don't blame him for constraining himself or his commenters. When I differ with him I usually suffice to say I differ.
I feel similarly about Mangan. I feel similarly about anyone who isn't necessarily intrigued or angered by the same things I am. Yes I'm frustrated when others who claim to be concerned about what ills the West defend jews even as they blame Whites. But if I'm concerned about anything, including this, and I want others to be similarly concerned, then I consider it my responsibility to understand and argue the subject so as to convince others there's something to be concerned about. Trying to harangue or otherwise browbeat others into accepting a position rather than convincing them by force of reason or marshaling facts is distasteful and alien to me. It is how our enemies behave. I recognized these distasteful tactics long before I recognized (or I should say, gathered the information and courage to recognize) the alien influence driving them.
The intention was not to harangue or browbeat. I was stating in a forcible fashion why their position of soft racialism will not work. I was also commenting on the inability of these types to allow any criticism of jews. As I said, "what they hope to accomplish is beyond me."
I never said that Sailer and Mangan haven't done things of value either. But ultimately, there is a limit to what you can do by preaching to an insulated, conservative choir (we're insular ourselves, but certainly not conservative and therein lies the difference). People have been deceived into impotence in the past by purveyors of these 'middle positions'.
Mangan and Sailer, in my view, cannot be convinced of the essential impotence of their actions. It is the duty of racialists to expose the 'why' of this. Which is what I did.
There is a difference between faux-White pro-jew racialists who actively attack "anti-semites" on precisely the same group-discrimination-is-evil basis "liberals" use (I'm thinking here of Auster, Jobling, or Guy White), and the crypto- or pro-White racialists who steer clear of the unpleasant reality of White/jew relations lest they suffer the same attacks. I don't blame the latter for impotence so much as I blame the former for their hypocritical and quite intentional impotence-inducing aggression.
Those who have decided to face the unpleasant reality can best serve our side by revealing the true aggressors, rather than criticizing our own sidelined players. For those who are as I was a big part of the excuse for staying on the sidelines is the belief that we're all on the same side. They don't see how jews have done us wrong, which allows them to believe jews have only done us right, and it is we who have always made them the victims of undeserved and unthinking hatred. It's our job to reveal the wrongs and hate that flow from them toward us.
It really isn't hard with these faux-White pro-jews helping. As upset as they say "liberals" make them, they obviously reserve their stongest venom for "the anti-semites" whose great crime is to dare to discuss the wrongs jews have done Whites.
Yes, and your expositions on the Joblings, Whites and Austers of the world are very much appreciated, not just by me but by the entire pro-white blogosphere. Even smart people, like Mr. Scrooby at MR, have been hoodwinked by those fellows.
One of the mistakes I probably have made is assuming that everyone can pick out the Benedict Arnolds like the above mentioned fellows.
Mangan, Sailer and anyone else who can bring about some kind of attitude change in white readers, even if it is just bringing them from liberalism to a more realistic approach, is valuable. Both have done much interesting work over time. Sailer's approach in particular has attracted young whites to racialism, something we badly need.
But of course that doesn't mean I won't retaliate in kind when targeted by someone like Mangan. He should understand that people like me are less poisonous to our cause than people like Auster whom he, btw, associates with. If he can't I will set him straight and not gently.
Shalmaneser -
You are very keen, like Tanstaafl, to the J-ew-das Goats around us.
Bravo--and thanks for the vigilance!
*Keep raising the appropriate suspicions of this "Freiboden" character: He/she/it, or one'of its minions is absolutely 'making the rounds' on MANY WN sites doin' some heavy promoting!
Wonder why???
Ive had a look at the Freiboden blog.
Is a bit suspect.
There is a post there asking whether slavery is all bad.
Even as a thought experiment there is nothing, nothing at all, to be gained politically from white people thinking about the possible upsides to slavery.
I also note she takes the holocaust at face value.
"There is a post there asking whether slavery is all bad.
"Even as a thought experiment there is nothing, nothing at all, to be gained politically from white people thinking about the possible upsides to slavery."
Wow, sounds like a DHS [Department of Homeland Stupidity] plant/provacateur!
The critical comments about Freiboden here have caused me to question my positive first impression.
She has an impressive depth of knowledge of White-jew relations and jewish history which reflects either long-term opposition research, or being raised in a jewish milieu. She shares her knowledge very casually, as if everyone knows even the most esoteric things she alludes to. At the same time, for someone who regularly refers to "us", hinting that she sympathizes with Whites, she comes across just as much or more sympathetic with jews.
The more I read the more Freiboden strikes me as a type of Auster, appealing to "us" by stating damning truths about "them" that most Whites aren't aware of much less speak of. Auster always carefully leavens his criticism of jews with apologia and unreal caricatures of "exterminationist anti-semites", while Frieboden says flatly negative things about jews that she, oddly enough, feels the need to lard with less unreal but still gratuitously negative caricatures of "stupid goyim".
Frieboden is to Auster as Revilo Oliver is to John Derbyshire. Andrea "Neo-Nazis are pretty rotten people" Frieboden likely regards Oliver with as much disgust as Lawrence "I called him a bigot against israel, not an anti-semite" Auster regards Derbyshire (and Buchanan, and Paul Craig Roberts, and...).
My analogizing is inappropriate if only because Revilo Oliver stands out like a truth-telling giant amongst so many sniveling, fibbing midgets.
I didn't chase Rienzi ("JWH") off MR. I was the least of his problems. Plenty of others had leveled similar charges at him.
Fundamentally, race is about "what is." The sum of Rienzi's efforts are related to getting himself included as "white-no question marks," hence all the blather about the need for "testing."
I wonder if you fans of his can summarize in a few sentences what you learnt from Rienzi that makes him so valuable? I think you'll struggle.
As for the rest of you, the world is a million miles from where you are. None of you really 'wrong' about anything, just occasionally far too extreme, and needlessly and irrationally so. But you won't reach many with what you've got, that is painfully obvious (and should have been 50 years ago). Millions upon millions must feel similarly, but there's something holding them back. I think it's a much wiser use of one's time to ponder what those things might be, identify them, and restructure one's discourse appropriately to accommodate it to those concerns. But even then, that's only the millions who feel similarly -- what about the millions upon millions of others (whites) who don't? It's existence at a most incredible level of unreality to believe they can be ignored (although a Harry Covington type uprising might allow them to be).
It wasn't that you chased JWH off. I think it was more a case of JWH deciding that it wasn't worthwhile to expend energy on a site where timewasters like yourself are allowed to run free.
Don't flatter yourself into thinking that you're disliked because you expose flaws in other's ideologies. You're disliked because you're obnoxious and repellent.
the world is a million miles from where you are -
I'm not concerned about reaching the world. I'm concerned about reaching family, friends, and those White strangers who are stuck now where I was 22 months ago. In all modesty I think I've been fairly effective disillusioning others like me concerning Auster and other faux-White charlatans like him.
The sum of JWH's efforts, for me, was the heads up on technological developments coming down the pipe that will make it cheap and easy to better know the heritage of ourselves and others. Considering the long and ignoble history of "passing" this surely frightens the bejesus out of blacks, jews, and whatever you are. JWH also often brought to my attention news items of interest I otherwise wouldn't have seen.
The sum of your efforts are divisive and demoralizing, and it seems that is your intent. Considering for example your handiwork here, as Anonymous, I'm not inclined to care in the slightest what you think I should do with my discourse.
Tan,
First of all -
You are one of the most valuable men of the West on the Web today!
Secondly -
Thank you for all your hard work and efforts raising awareness of the J-ew-das Goats who insidiously threaten our movements, and, even far worse, our moral and self-confidence.
I gotta tell ya, this "freiboden" character is a marienette;
...where the strings are being cleverly pulled either from Brooklyn or Tel Aviv!
If this, presumptive, 'WN' is really on 'our side', I don't really see the need to constantly make--unsubstantiated-- references to--supposed--jew 'brilliance', and the 'debt' that Western society supposedly 'owes' to these alien Khazars!
Even if these allegations were [sic] "true" (which there not); nonetheless, there simply is no need to further demoralize the less-savvy of US into thinking that we 'need' the jews to run a 'modern' society --
...hence these jews 'deserve' to do what they do and have 'control' over our lives!!!
The overiding impression that I get, again, aside from the grandiose way of telling us things that we overwhelmingly are familiar with...,
...is even the jewish tactics that "she" critisizes, however 'vehemently' really seem to be almost a secret, cryptic kind of PRAISE:(!!!
**
Matthew 7:15 -
"Beware of false prophets who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are savage wolves."
Matthew 24:24 -
"For false Christs and false prophets will arise and will show great signs and wonders, so as to mislead, if possible, even the elect."
*SO AS TO MISLEAD THE VERY ELECT*
This is the penultimate purpose of the J-ew-das Goat in their SOLE MISSION in deceiving the divine LEADERSHIP of the Nations and Peoples.
Discussing the upside of slavery in the context of what could be a WN site is utterly pointless. Surely thats obvious?
Thats the dream ticket for any liberal. "Oh look what these scary white supremacists are doing now! They want slavery back"
Great. White folks really need that kind of positive publicity.
Which is why I suspect the motives of dear Angela and her blog.
And remind me, hows slavery and its aftermath working out for the US so far?
Tanstaafl, you take criticism too personally. Ideas are more important than personalities and I'm afraid I find your ideas, and that of the majority of your colleagues, less than adequate. If you consider this "demoralizing," I'm afraid you may have other problems completely apart from race.
All of us owe a debt of gratitude to those who opened our eyes to these issues, but that shouldn't blind you to the possibility that those who brought you this far may not be those best suited to carrying you forward.
As far as having the "bejesus" scared out of me goes, yes, there's some truth in that. But I've managed to put those concerns aside and focus in on what I think are the core issues, most important of which is a racialist perspective that will attract the mostest the soonest. That requires stripping racialism of some the baggage that others insist on encumbering it with, so certain clashes are unavoidable. That doesn't make me the villain you seem set on believing I am. You're wrong to think so and you're wrong to consider others in my position (including, I have to believe, substantial numbers of Jews) your intrinsic enemies.
Just in case anyone didn't notice---
Freiboden is German for “FREE BOOTY”.
Suckers!
'Freiboden is German for “FREE BOOTY”.'
German is my mother tongue. "Freiboden" means "free ground". "free booty" in German would be "freie Beute" (or "Freibeute").
Unlike Auster, antisemitism is not a no-no for Andrea Freiboden. And unlike her (or him), Auster would have censored comments which expose the holocaust as a hoax in short order. Your criticism of her (or him) strikes me as premature, she (or he) might just be in the process of learning the full truth yet.
"Your criticism of her (or him) strikes me as premature, she (or he) might just be in the process of learning the full truth yet."
-
Know the full truth yet???
AKA writes these long-winded, PhD-level dissertations (loaded with profanities) on race and the JQ, and we are to believe that this supposed WN doesn't understand the 'whole enchilada' yet!!???
C'mon!
Especially the endless insults against Anglo-Eurpoeans, especially men (especially conflating them like the jews do with other 'gentiles' in an undifferentiated mass)!
How is this behavior becoming of someone who (purportedly) knows-no, feels-the extreme dire predicament that we face as a People and shows the snarky contempt for 'goyim'; and the men of her [sic] "race"?
Na, this one doesn't even pass the smell test.
A couple of posters back seemed to have hit the nail on the right on the head...:
"If this, presumptive, 'WN' is really on 'our side', I don't really see the need to constantly make--unsubstantiated--references to--supposed--jew 'brilliance', and the 'debt' that Western society supposedly 'owes' to these alien Khazars!
"Even if these allegations were [sic] "true" (which there not); nonetheless, there simply is no need to further demoralize the less-savvy of US into thinking that we 'need' the jews to run a 'modern' society --
"...hence these jews 'deserve' to do what they do and have 'control' over our lives!!!
"...is even the jewish tactics that "she" critisizes, however 'vehemently' really seem to be almost a secret, cryptic kind of PRAISE:(!!!"
-
"...a secret, cryptic kind of PRAISE"
Yup, that seems about right.
BTW - "Freiboden" kinda does seem like a cryptic allegory of sorts, whatever it literally means.
"Freiboden" means "free ground".
Actually, 'boden' literally translates as 'bottom', with ground being a supplemental noun.
So it does seem to be a possibility (given her rep) of some kind of allegorical insinuation to a certain kind and type of women.
~guten Abend
"Considering the long and ignoble history of "passing" this surely frightens the bejesus out of blacks, jews, and whatever you are."
LOL. Silver doesn't deserve more of a response than that.
I've seen the Freiboden site, and put me down as highly suspicious. Among other things, and as pointed out by another poster, painting Congoids as uber-masculine, athletic alpha males is a trait very frequently found in the Tribe. The only problem with that view is that everything in Congoid history says they can't rise above Stone Age levels when left to their own devices.
I like Sailer. I disagree with him some times but he is always interesting and willing to consider the evidence on a particular question. He did mention something about Malcolm Gladwell once in an article, which hinted at his frustration that a clown like Gladwell is famous and no doubt earns a nice salary, when Sailer has on more than one occasion taken him apart. So maybe he is cutting ballast as his ballon rises. If so, I sympathize with him to an extent, because watching Gladwell become revered as some sort of deep thinker is really a lot to stomach.
It gets better -
“Andrea” has posted on other sites under the name ANDREI!:
http://www.chicagoreader.com/features/stories/moviereviews/090115/
Corrected link for "Andrei" -
http://tinyurl.com/olg3p7
The mexican flu burns on, and the tidbits of information revealed become curiouser and curiouser.
From Swine Flu May Be Human Error; WHO Investigates Claim, dated 13 May 2009:
“One of the simplest explanations is that it’s a laboratory escape,” Gibbs said in an interview with Bloomberg Television today. “But there are lots of others."
One of the other explanations is enormous pig farm incubators coupled with human jumbo-jet incubators whisking the infection hither and fro.
“The sooner we get to grips with where it’s come from, the safer things might become,” Gibbs said by phone from Canberra yesterday. “It could be a mistake” that occurred at a vaccine production facility or the virus could have jumped from a pig to another mammal or a bird before reaching humans, he said.
At some point many more will realize that back in the early days, when the outbreak was relatively contained to mexico, the globalist apparatchiks could have bought precious time for research and immunization. Instead at the very beginning WHO and the CDC and Obama told us that it was already too late to close the barn door.
Gibbs said his analysis supports research by scientists including Richard Webby, a virologist at St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, who found the new strain is the product of two distinct lineages of influenza that have circulated among swine in North America and Europe for more than a decade.
In addition, Gibbs said his research found the rate of genetic mutation in the new virus was about three times faster than that of the most closely related viruses found in pigs, suggesting it evolved outside of swine.
Gene Evolution
“Whatever speeded up the evolution of these genes happened at least seven or eight years ago, so one wonders, why hasn’t it been found?” Gibbs said today.
Some scientists have speculated that the 1977 Russian flu, the most recent global outbreak, began when a virus escaped from a laboratory.
How long before the people who blame the ongoing global financial fraud on "blue-eyed" Whites do the same with this pandemic?
Here's an older story, AP: Mexico's epidemiology boss faults WHO, dated 1 May 2009:
Mexico's chief epidemiologist accused the World Health Organization of being slow to respond to the country's warning about a health crisis that turned into a global swine flu scare and called for an investigation.
Dr. Miguel Angel Lezana told The Associated Press late Thursday his center alerted the Pan American Health Organization on April 16 about alarming occurrences of flu and atypical pneumonia in Mexico. But no action was taken until eight days later when the World Health Organization said it was "very, very concerned" the outbreak could grow into a pandemic.
"It seems it should have been more immediate," Lezana, director of the National Epidemiology Center, told AP in a telephone interview.
A WHO spokesman said Friday the health body was not informed until April 24 that there was a new flu strain when it learned of the new virus from U.S. authorities. He said the the organization then responded rapidly.
WHO's claim that they "knew nuttink" until April 24th smells. A day earlier it had already been reported that a Company warned officials of flu 18 days before alert was issued:
A Washington state biosurveillance firm raised the first warning about a possible outbreak of swine flu in Mexico more than two weeks before the World Health Organization offered its initial alert about a public health emergency of international concern.
Both federal and international health officials had access to the warning from Veratect Corp. Later e-mails calling attention to the company's subsequent report that the disease was possibly spreading in Mexico were sent to 10 officials of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said Robert Hart, the company's chief executive.
Hart said he wasn't sure why health officials didn't act sooner.
"They have a lot of other responsibilities," Hart said on Thursday. "But every day makes a difference."
. . .
On April 6, 18 days before the WHO issued its alert, Veratect reported on its Web site a strange outbreak of respiratory disease in La Gloria, Mexico, noting that local residents thought the outbreak was linked to contamination from pig breeding farms nearby.
Hart said the information was available to the CDC and many state and local health authorities. The company's server showed an epidemiologist at the Pan American Health Organization, which is part of the World Health Organization, looked at the message about the La Gloria outbreak twice, on April 10 and 11, Hart said.
Ten days after the warning was first issued, on April 16, Veratect reported the disease was possibly spreading in Mexico with an "unspecified number of atypical pneumonia cases" detected at a hospital in Oaxaca. Because of the heightened concern, an automated e-mail was sent to 10 people at the CDC to notify them the report was available.
With the outbreak apparently spreading, Hart said the company's chief scientist, James Wilson, called people he knew at the CDC's Emergency Operations Center on April 20 to alert them to what was happening in Mexico. At that point, the CDC was focused on possible swine flu events in Texas and California, and a physician at the emergency operations center indicated the CDC was not aware of the spreading outbreak in Mexico, Hart said.
"We thought this deserved immediate attention and they started looking at it," Hart said.
Four days later, the World Health Organization made its announcement.
Don't the CDC and WHO talk to each other? Rather than ignorance, the more likely explanation is that for days they all sat on what they were hearing because they were thinking, "The Holy Global Economy forbids anything be permitted to threaten the free movement of mexicans into the US, and this flu is a clear and present threat."
Even a false broken-window boost to the economy contains an indictment of globalism. In Swine flu has surgical mask maker ramping up production, published on 28 April 2009:
"We're hoping it's not the big one," said Bowen, the company's executive vice president. "And we hope it makes our country wake up to the fact that we're dependent on foreign products."
How dare anyone use such deplorably racist terms like "our country" and "foreign products" in this resplendent era of globalized migration, trade, and pandemic?
WHO declares first 21st century flu pandemic, 11 June 2009:
The World Health Organization declared an influenza pandemic on Thursday and called on governments to prepare for a long-term battle against an unstoppable flu virus.
The United Nations agency raised its pandemic flu alert to phase 6 on a six-point scale, indicating the first influenza pandemic since 1968 is under way.
"With today's announcement, WHO moves from an emergency to a longer-term response. Based on past experience, this pandemic will be with us for some months, if not years, to come," WHO Director-General Dr Margaret Chan said in a letter to staff, a copy of which was obtained by Reuters.
And in a few years Chan, or whoever replaces her, will refer to the Mexican flu as "the old days".
"Likewise there are Hetrosexuals only COZ there are Homosexuals ! Go figure -
There are heteros only thanks to homos? Think about what kind of brain it must take to so flagrantly invert reality like that."
The original quote was intended as pro-gay, but it could be easily turned to an anti-gay interpretation.
Originally it meant, "Everyone is pansexual, so everyone should swap fluids without distinctions of hetero and homo."
But you could turn it around to, "Everyone is a Darwinian breeding machine, therefore there is no "homosexual identity," only "homosexual genital contact," which is meaningless and harmful for survival and reproduction."
Post a Comment
<< Home