Blog has moved, searching new blog...

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Ted Kennedy's Legacy: Genocidal Immigrationist

I wrote about Ted Kennedy's Legacy when his brain cancer was first announced in May of 2008. My opinion has only soured since. Please indulge me as I summarize his shameful legacy one more time, especially as our enemies at this moment are producing geysers of grief and love for their fallen hero.

From Wikipedia's Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (AKA Hart-Celler Act):
During debate on the Senate floor, Kennedy, speaking of the effects of the act, said, "First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same.... Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset.... Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia.... In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think.... The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs."[2] The act's supporters not only claimed the law would not change America's ethnic makeup, but that such a change was not desirable.[1]

By equalizing immigration policies, the Act resulted in a flood of new immigration from non-European nations that changed the ethnic make-up of the United States.[3] Immigration doubled between 1965 and 1970 and doubled again between 1970 and 1990.[1]
From George Borjas' The Bush-Kennedy-McCain Sham(nesty):
Regarding the 1986 Immigration and Reform Control Act (the first amnesty of illegal immigrants), Senator Kennedy predicted: "This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this." The 1986 legislation, by the way, ended up granting amnesty to around 3 million illegal immigrants.
What follows now are amongst Kennedy's final, and in my opinion most significant, words on the subject of immigration, offered just over two years ago in the wake of the failure of the comprehensive amnesty bill he had worked hard to enact. This intemperate and deeply cynical outburst has been all but memory-holed by the press. From BizzyBlog's Bias in Coverage of Immigration-Bill Failure Extends to Protecting Ted ‘Gestapo’ Kennedy:
We know what they’re against, we don’t know what they’re for. Time and time again they tell us “We don’t like this provision, we don’t like that provision, we don’t want that part. Well they ought to be able to explain to the American people what they are for.

What are they going to do with the twelve and a half million who are undocumented here? Send them back? Send them back to countries around the world? More than $250 billion dollars, buses that would go from Los Angeles to New York and back again. Try and find them, develop a type of Gestapo here to seek out these people that are in the shadows. That’s their alternative?
HotAir provides video.

During the long arc of Kennedy's career as a rich, famous and increasingly powerful senator-for-life he dedicated a sizable portion of his fame and power to advocating nation-wrecking levels of legal immigration, though his good will extended even to tens of millions of illegal aliens who violated the liberal immigration laws he sponsored. A notable and consistent feature of his support for immigration was mendacity. It began with a denial of the negative impact immigration would likely have on us, the citizenry whose interests he was sworn to defend. His triumphant words in 1965 were in hindsight more prophesy than denial, for the future did unfold just as he promised it would not. The mendacity continued in 1986, two decades on, when he downplayed the horrible impact even though it was by then clear for all to see. It was in fact under the pretense of addressing this impact that he again made assertions later proven false. He again mouthed promises he made no effort to keep. The mendacity continued in 2007, another two decades on, the consequences of his handiwork now an order of magnitude larger than what he had promised would never happen again. His lies now concerned the impossibility of remedy and the negative impact any such remedy would have on the aliens. The interests of the citizenry no longer even rated lip service. He openly opposed us and cast aspersions on us.

For leaving a young woman to drown Kennedy appeared on nationwide television and apologized. For sinking our once orderly and prosperous nation, trapping 200 million Whites (and slipping) with 100 million non-Whites (and exploding), he never apologized. He went to the grave hating us.

If Kennedy had pursued medicine instead of politics we can imagine what might have happened. He might have shot his neighbor right after saying it was crazy for them to imagine he would do so. Then he might berate them for complaining about their pain while being wheeled into surgery, telling them not to worry, he'll fix it. Finally he might let them die on the operating table because, in his expert estimation, to remove the bullet would simply cause too much harm. No sorries and no worries. The next of kin will get the bill.

Then he'd go out and find another neighbor to "help". And another. And another. It would have been much better for most of us if Kennedy had gone this route. After only a few neighbors some cop or reporter would have started asking questions and his crime wave would have been stopped. What we got instead is far worse.

The next time you read about a crime committed by an alien, or the anchor baby of an alien, think about that. Remember Ted Kennedy. It's on his head. He did his best to open the door for them and keep them here.

Ted's brother Jack once called on America to put men on the moon, a quarter million miles away. Just because. And lo, with plenty of money and brainstorming and elbow grease men were there, less than a decade later. Playing golf. Ted in his turn, given an opportunity to right a wrong he helped create, argued instead that Americans should simply surrender and accept colonization by hostile, impoverished, uneducated aliens, because, we're to believe, he couldn't stomach the effort required to stop it.

In comparison to the trillions our corrupt politicians have since rushed to transfer from taxpayers to international financiers, Ted's scary $250B for deportation seems positively puny. Beside that, it would be spread broadly and domestically in pursuit of a goal the citizenry has actually expressed an interest in. It would be an investment which would pay large dividends in the form of savings on unemployment, healthcare, law enforcement, education, utilities and infrastructure, and much more. In contrast, the trillions dropped in financier laps have simply vanished. The credit that absolutely positively had to loosen? It didn't. Beyond preserving some undeserved bonuses it seems those trillions just got sucked right into the vacuum created by a decade or more of financial fraud and false profits. Plan B seems to be to give the country, and all of us, to China.

To hell with the money. It pales next to the genocide. Given the choice I would gladly put myself and my children on the hook for any amount to stop the immigration invasion, to send the ones already here home. As it happens I'm sure doing so would actually save money, which only makes the pain inflicted on us - the crowding, the crime, the violence, the political correctness - all the more senseless. Except it's not. It's genocide. We have what others want. We're in their way. That's the dynamic. You can see it in their furtive glare. At some point, as our numbers dwindle, order will break down. Look to Zimbabwe or South Africa to see where we're heading.

You may not think of immigration as genocide. I never used to. Even now I don't think it always was, or that it has to be. But recently I decided that the senseless flood being forced down our throats definitely is genocidal. It's obliterating who and what we are. Fast and forever.

Allow me to offer a few of the stepping stones that brought me to this conclusion.

"Whether you declare war or not, we are in a societal conflict" excerpts a report, published in December of 2007, less than six months after Kennedy's "gestapo" meltdown, on the hundreds of thousands of violent, criminal gangbangers fanning out across the US. Ted Kennedy was on their side. He wanted to make them citizens.

Pew Something Stinks describes how immigration has transformed the ethnic mix of this country. Anyone who knows anything about immigration knows this. Our corrupt politicians know we know it. In 1965 altering the mix was acknowledged, even by Kennedy, to be a bad idea. Today we're supposed to pretend it's a good thing, that we always wanted it to happen, otherwise we're evil "racists".

Genocidal Immigrationists is my first use of the phrase, prompted by the increasingly blatant sickening enthusiasm for nation-wrecking immigration in media and self-righteous jewish organizations, lobbying more zealously than ever for their immigrant friends. What seems insane is in truth only anti-White. It's time to wake up. Smell the genocide.

- - -

On Tuesday, 25 August 2009, Senator Edward Kennedy died, escaping the justice he so richly deserved. It is Kennedy's advocacy for genocidal immigration, especially after its ghastly impact was obvious, for which he should always be remembered. In ignominy. In infamy. Good riddance.

Labels: , , ,



Blogger Tanstaafl said...

America’s Greatest Traitor Dies:

Edward Kennedy will go down in the annals of history as one of the greatest traitors America has ever produced, due to his attempts to utterly destroy the country of his birth.

With more details on Kennedy's debauched pursuit of genocide. Godspeed BNP.

8/26/2009 10:25:00 PM  
Anonymous itnw said...,7340,L-3767967,00.html

Not only did he promote anti-white immigration laws, but he was apparently a life long supporter of Israel and Jewish interests as these links explain.

8/27/2009 05:04:00 PM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

Good links. From the second one:

From his first year in the Senate, 1962, until his last votes, Kennedy was a stalwart Israel supporter.

. . .

According to one tally, Ted Kennedy voted 100 percent in concert with positions taken by Aipac, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee.

Unfortunately for us Ted never make aliyah.

8/28/2009 02:12:00 PM  
Anonymous burnham said...

Interesting blogger asking interesting questions. But who is the 'they' of the Brave New World Order.

8/31/2009 11:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...


A bit off topic, but a very interesting debate/discussion over at this site on what Whites are the "real Americans" -

You are usually excellent at smoking out people's motives and intentions, and I wonder if you would proffer an opinion, cause there is something amiss with what the guy "David" is calling for. (read all the comments.)

9/02/2009 12:29:00 AM  
Blogger flippityflopitty said...

Anon - I would say he is just misguided and has obviously not looked at a demographics breakdown of the USA. Even if you can perceive the USA by dominant ethnic concentrations (2000 census for what its worth)

the proposal of migration and displacement of Nordish, let alone White persons is mind-numbing. What he assesses as "the US" can not include much of the south and west nor any major urban center.

9/02/2009 02:32:00 PM  
Blogger flippityflopitty said...

One is simply better off identifying a White place to call home and moving there (if that's your preference) and hoping the tide doesnt rise to close to your shoreline.

As Ive spouted in the past, short of a miracle, the only way to control the tide is to take local politics by storm and look for your representatives in Congress to gum up the works.

Under the current dark cloud, there is a government-sanctioned integration march and a continuing influx of immigrants and refugees.

Nordics (or Nordish), as well as WN's can stamp their feet all they want, but it wont change demographics and it wont stop the migrations.

9/02/2009 02:45:00 PM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

Reading that thread at n/a's I don't get the sense David Smith is doing anything but affirming his Nordishness. Nordman made the case for pan-Whiteness well enough, but it's not hard to imagine why some Whites are less broad-minded about who they'd like to have as countrymen, neighbors, or in-laws. I don't resent them for it, though Ben Franklin's words do come to mind:

"We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately."

9/02/2009 07:11:00 PM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

Along similar lines but at the other end of the pan-White spectrum I had an exchange last week with The Undiscovered Jew on the OneSTDV thread "More Thoughts on White Ethnostate".

9/02/2009 07:29:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you both Tan and flippityflopitty.

It is just that the guy 'david smith' came across a little too creepy, especially with his concern that people were supposedly misspelling McCulloch's name.

Obviously a cult mindset, since, as you say FF, about his 'obviously not looking at a demographic breakdown of the US'.

The guy debating him really closed well with the quote from Tom Sunic regarding the fantasies of the "proud Aryan internet warriors", who really get stuck on the silly hollywood kosher Nazi imagery.

Either way, 'david' better get out of his basement and start seeing what the real White America is about.

9/03/2009 06:35:00 AM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said... Blog Articles » Ted Kennedy’s Legacy: Symbolism vs. Stark Realities considers the mainstream media's "enshrinement of the deceased" and notes the many paragraphs it took most to get around to mentioning Chappaquiddick.

The few MSM stories I surveyed early on never even mentioned immigration. Again, this is despite, or rather because right after ObamaKennedyCare gets rahmmed down our throats amnesty is next up on the legislative agenda. For the MSM to at this moment remind the White citizenry about immigration by retrospecting and celebrating Kennedy's contribution to it would not at all fit the regime's anti-White agenda. Whites are upset enough about the bailout ripoff, being taxed enough already, an undocumented president, and socialism.

There are two things the regime has been really goldilocks at: governing and disguising the rate of Change.

9/03/2009 07:42:00 AM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

I liked Sunic's essay, The Beauty and the Beast: Race and Racism in Europe, Part III.

Here's an unrelated essay in which the pragmatic biopolitical thrust is similar: 21st Century British Nationalism: The Art of War and Politics.

They are hoping that the minority of 'Purists' in the party will cause so much trouble if we dared evolve our strategy and tactics to enable us to keep participating in the democratic electoral process that we will be unable to evolve and that we will either be banned because we will refuse to evolve, or that we will implode if we did evolve.

Those that want to give our enemies what they want - which is for us to allow the BNP to be banned or to cause the BNP to implode are the mortal enemies of nationalism.

Those that want to give our enemies what they want - which is for us to renounce our Whiteness even as we are attacked for our Whiteness - are the mortal enemies of Whites.

9/03/2009 08:14:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Many Faces of National Socialism


"The much discussed German anti-Slavic policies, which were based on the alleged racial inferiority of Slavs, are nonsense — all the more so since at least one out of three Germans carries the name of Slavic origin. Prior to 1945, well over 15 million Germans were born and lived in the Slavic speaking areas of East Europe, including the third-ranking man in the National Socialist command, the Russian-Baltic born German Alfred Rosenberg. Rosenberg's face shows Nordic features with a slight Alpine Slavic streak.


"Some of the highest ranking German generals in the Wehrmacht were of Slavic-German origin. Their family names are clearly Slavic and their skull morphology points to a large variety of all European subracial types, from the Alpine ("ostisch"), the Mediterranean ("westisch") to the Nordic: Hans Hellmich, Curt Badinski, Bruno Chrobeck, Emil Dedek, Heinrich Domansky, Walter Dybilasz, Erich Glodkowski, Kurt Mierzinsky, Adalbert Mikulicz, Bronislaw Pawel, Georg Radziej, Hans Radisch, Franz Zednicek, Walter von Brauchitsch. So were the other high German officers such as the master of panzer warfare, the round-headed Heinz Guderian, who was of distant Armenian origin, or the tall and big-nosed Wilhelm Canaris, who was of Italian/Greek origin. (See the important book by Christopher Dolbeau — practically unknown in France — Face au Bolchevisme: Petit dictionnaire des résistances nationales à l’Est de l’Europe: 1917–1989. (Against Bolshevism: A Little Dictionary of National Resistances in East Europe: 1917–1989)."


And, best of all -

"To assume, therefore, that the Institute for Racial Hygiene in Germany or the Gestapo were checking the names or the cranial index of high German officials, before admitting them to high military positions is academic lunacy. Yet a type of deliberate lunacy is still alive in some influential anti-German conspiratorial circles in the West and in America. The alleged racism of Germans against Slavs was part and parcel of the Allied propaganda and later of the Frankfurt School, whose goal was to whip up Slavs during and after WWII into anti-German frenzy. By accepting more than one million volunteers from Russia, Ukraine, Croatia, Slovakia, etc. in the Wehrmacht and by allowing half a million non-German European volunteers in the Waffen SS, the German high military command thought it could create its own version of united Europe and successfully fight the war on two fronts."

... **The alleged racism of Germans against Slavs was part and parcel of the Allied propaganda and later of the Frankfurt School, whose goal was to whip up Slavs during and after WWII into anti-German frenzy.** ...

Got that, basement-dwelling kosher hollyweird Nazis??

I will also leave an excellent quote from Tan the Man himself, for all the "proud Aryan internet warriors" -

"... If you sincerely seek strict genetic purity for yourself and your family you'll get no objections from me. But it seems to me this is more often a position taken falsely by provocateurs who fear White unity and wish to keep us weak and fractured into many little squabbling ethnies.

"Which is it in your case?"

9/03/2009 03:49:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Along similar lines but at the other end of the pan-White spectrum I had an exchange last week with The Undiscovered Jew on the OneSTDV thread "More Thoughts on White Ethnostate"."

Taanstafl, I am such a huge fan.

In the thread you linked to, I read this post by TUJ:

""More GSS fun! In response to something Whiskey said, I have updated my post on women & immigration. I got home today planning on doing a different GSS post. There had been two recent posts at the Hoover Hog on anti-semites, and a theme that stuck with me is the theory that Jews are pursuing a group evolutionary strategy against the white race. This is used by the racial right (although some deny being rightists) to explain Jewish liberalism. Half Sigma, in contrast, explains Jewish liberalism as being motivated to keep school prayer away from their kids, as Christianity with all its fun holidays and lack of dietary restrictions is just too much of a temptation for a Jewish mother to hazard. I’m going to look at questions that are racially vs religiously charged and compare the responses of Jews vs whites generally to see where the gap is larger"

So here TUJ is saying, Dr. MacDonald is wrong. Anti-White activism by Jews is NOT due to evolutionary group strategies (that is, that it is genetic.) TUJ uses Half Sigma's that it's all about religion.

But I've also seen him argue that Dr. MacDonald is wrong this way: Jews are not anti-White from genetic impulse. No. It's their secularism, he says -- that is, lack of religiosity -- that makes them liberals, and it's the liberalism which accounts for the anti-White activism.

So which IS it, TUJ, that motivates the anti-White hostility? Is it about religion, as you quote Half Sigma to argue, or is it secularism, that is, LACK of religiosity, as you ALSO argue? Hmmm? Pick one.

So, Taanstafl, is another perfect example of typical jew behavior: unabashadly, disingenuously, arguing two utterly contradictory theories at the same time -- in order to confuse. And all of it is done in pursuit of the real jew goal -- deflect and confuse the audience from the truth: That is, that Dr. MacDonald is CORRECT.

I was always confused listening to jews until I started reading your blog. Now I get it. Thanks.

9/03/2009 04:34:00 PM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

If I were to impersonate a jew for the purpose of calling attention to typically jewish behaviors I don't think I could do a better job of it than The Undiscovered Jew does. I might have even picked that pen name to really drive the irony home.

9/03/2009 09:05:00 PM  
Anonymous fellist said...

Did you catch the discussion between Auster and The Undiscovered Jew at VFR?

TUJ explained his moniker:

'I chose the handle, The Undiscovered Jew, as a play on "The undiscovered country" from Hamlet, because I simply thought it sounded neat.'

'I'm actually half Jewish, half non-Jewish white, but call myself the Undiscovered Jew because "The Undiscovered Half-Jew" sounds too awkward.'

Auster repled: 'Well, that's ok' -- and moved straight on.

I would have asked the HBD buff why he didn't bother to identify the other half -- except to define it by what it's not -- as 'non-Jewish (w)hite.'

I mean if the guy thinks Jews are White and was aiming at economy why not just call himself The Undiscovered White. And if he's such an HBD fanatic why ignore fully half of his own biodiversity seemingly habitually? Heck, if the other half's Italian, say, why not call himself 'Undiscovered Italian'?

I was reminded of an interview I read with one of the girls from 'That 70s Show.' She was talking about being half-Jewish and not talking about being half-something else, and mentioned that the other young lead female in the show was also half-Jewish (and presumably half-something else that doesn't matter). She said they called each other half-bagels.

I wondered about the non-Jewish parents of those girls and how they had each managed to raise a child that was extremely conscious of the heritage passed on by the other parent but so indifferent to the heritage from their side of the family. But I think it's common - what should be bizarre seems the way it always goes down.

I suspect James Bowery's G-O-D hypothesis may be able to explain at least some of it:

9/04/2009 03:02:00 AM  
Blogger flippityflopitty said...

Maybe it's just "hip" to claim jewishness these days. You can always fall back on "you're just an anti-semite" when people criticize you.

Tan - "White EthnoState" pretty much solidifies my aracial position.

9/04/2009 10:52:00 AM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

fellist, I hadn't noticed Is human bio-diversity the next conservatism?, thanks for the heads up.

Besides the exchange you quoted I noticed Auster's claim:

I do not tolerate atheists who are intolerant of religious people and who attack Christianity and belief in God.

I pointed out in Auster Projecting, Again that Auster provides a platform for Ken Hechtman who is likely the "Ken H" in In which circle of hell do the anti-Semites reside? There "Ken H" insults Christians as unthinking "true believers" and compares this caricature to Auster's caricature of anti-semites. This really disturbed Auster. Not because it was an insult to Christians, but because he didn't want his condemnation of anti-semites to be diminished in any way. "Ken H" agrees that "[a]nti-Semites are certainly outside the pale of normal civil discourse" after which Auster has nothing to say about his slur against Christians.

Auster is as Christian as the Dalai Lama's left testicle. He doesn't just tolerate anti-Christian Hechtman, he provides him a soapbox.

At the conclusion of Auster's HBD review he babbles:

I haven't read Jared Diamond's book. I did see a segment of the TV program based on it. It was the single crudest, most shocking exercise in anti-white bigotry and hate mongering I've ever seen. Talk about reductionism! He kept endlessly repeating the phrase, "guns, germs, and steel," "guns, germs, and steel." That's what the white West is: guns, germs, and steel. The white race as this brutal fist crushing and ruining humanity. It was on a par with the way Muslims and anti-Semites talk about Jews. Designed to make other people hate whites, and to make whites despise themselves so that they will have no will to continue existing. And Jared Diamond himself is a Jew.

Diamond is not anti-white, he's anti-White. The distinction is critical. For jews like Auster and TUJ "white" is a one-sided amalgam of White + jew. Jews may at any time distinguish themselves from Whites, but Whites may not distinguish themselves from jews. If Jared Diamond said anything at all that was anti-jew then Auster would have call him anti-semitic or a self-hating jew. Other jews would make sure Diamond's books never got published, never got publicized, and never got reviewed. On the contrary, Diamond is a celebrated best seller, because in our politically correct judaized society - where half-jews brag about their jewish half - it's perfectly politically correct to bash Whites. That's why jews dictating who's "white" or deploring something as anti-"white" is a farce. The oldest, loudest, most articulate, most hateful anti-White propaganda comes from jews. They're not directing hate at themselves. They're directing hate at Whites.

Auster and TUJ care about Whites to the extent we blindly serve jewish interests. Pursuant this goal they mouth platitudes regarding one big indistinguishable "white" family. But the second any White shows any awareness of the true nature of our parasitic "white" "friends" they demonstrate that true nature by transforming into hideous screeching harpies.

Even in his rebuke of Diamond Auster's point of reference is "the way Muslims and anti-Semites talk about Jews". That's his gold standard. The unhinged way he talks about "anti-semites" shows exactly where he's coming from. It's all about what's good for jews. His concern for "whites" is pure pretense.

BTW, last I heard Auster was amused by TUJ.

9/04/2009 10:19:00 PM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

Maybe it's just "hip" to claim jewishness these days.


"White EthnoState" pretty much solidifies my aracial position.

Well there's currently only one "white" ethnostate. By all means do try to impress your aracial position on them.

9/04/2009 10:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well there's currently only one "white" ethnostate. By all means do try to impress your aracial position on them.

Nice one Tan!

9/05/2009 03:31:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Re your Posh Spice link Tan...

I believe that Mr Posh i.e. David Beckham is of partly Jewish origin, not sure how far back.

9/05/2009 03:35:00 PM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

Kennedy helped change demographics of US as tireless advocate for immigrants |

As the nation mourns Kennedy, who died this week of a brain tumor at age 77, historians and immigrant advocates are remembering the senator — perhaps more than any other — as championing legislation that directly benefited immigrants, their children and their grandchildren. The 1965 law that he sponsored fundamentally changed the demographics of the country and transformed many urban enclaves into majority-minority cities.

But they say Kennedy also remained a "point man" in the Senate for immigrant advocates and minorities throughout his career, even supporting recent proposals to overhaul immigration laws aimed at undocumented workers.

. . .

Tatcho Mindiola, the director of the Center for Mexican American Studies at the University of Houston, said Kennedy remained an ally for immigrants and minorities, even though Massachusetts didn't have a sizable Latino or Asian population.

. . .

Political observers say Kennedy's most lasting legacy may be the rarely mentioned 1965 immigration law. Before its passage, a national origins quota system was in place to mirror the largely white-ancestral makeup of the U.S.

Rep. Charles A. Gonzalez, D-Texas, whose late father, Henry, served in Congress and worked with Kennedy on the legislation, said the bill would not have passed without Kennedy.

"He was huge and instrumental," Gonzalez said. "There's no way you can describe the importance of his involvement. He put all of his talents to make it work."

In 1965, the U.S. was around 85 percent white, according to various estimates. Today, a third of the country is minority, and nonwhites are on track to become the majority sometime in the 2040s.

Minority populations have grown by leaps and bounds because of high birth rates among those first generations of immigrants and a steady flow from Latin America, Asian and Africa since.

9/07/2009 10:54:00 PM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

Kevin MacDonald's The Morality of Majority Rights and Interests provides a link to Neal Gabler's Ted Kennedy, America's conscience:

What we loved and admired in him, what we hope for ourselves and our country, is his sense of moral largeness, his unbounded capacity to care, not because he was a saint but because he wasn't. By challenging us as he challenged himself, and reminding us where we fall short, Kennedy shames us, a gift that, one suspects, will linger in the national soul.

Neal Gabler is at work on a biography of Sen. Edward Kennedy.

9/07/2009 11:24:00 PM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

William Pierce wrote about one of Gabler's earlier books in Paying the Organizatsiya -- Free Speech, June 1998:

It is a difficult thing, a painful thing, for most Americans to face this problem of non-European immigration into America. Most Americans want to be nice, they want to be polite, they don't want to give offense. And because of this inherent politeness we have, we let ourselves be buffaloed by those clamoring for more "diversity." If there's one thing America doesn't need, one thing which is pure poison to America, it's more "diversity." But the Jews of Hollywood and Madison Avenue have done a very effective job of selling the notion to an impressionable and easily manipulated public that it's "nicer" and more "tolerant," "open-minded," and "fairer" to be in favor of letting non-Europeans -- including Soviet Jews -- continue pouring into America. A great many of us understand that we don't want any more non-Whites or any more Jews in America -- in fact, we don't want the ones that already are here -- but we feel an enormous pressure to smile, to be nice, and not to object to what is happening to our country. We are afraid to stand up against the propaganda of Jewish television, Jewish magazine advertisements, and Jewish films: propaganda that tells us more "diversity" is good for us, even when we know that it isn't.

Their propaganda, their pressure, is pervasive; it is everywhere. I just finished viewing a Jewish film about the history of the Hollywood film industry. The name of the film is
Hollywoodism. It openly discusses what everyone knew but was afraid to speak of openly for fear of being denounced as an "anti-Semite": namely, that Hollywood and the motion-picture industry are almost completely Jewish. The film talks about the Jews who came to America from Russia and other areas of eastern Europe early in this century and took over the fledgling motion-picture industry in Hollywood, elbowing most of the non-Jews out. The film claims that these immigrant Jews reinvented America for us. They cooked up an image of what they wanted America to be like -- more diverse, more democratic and proletarian, more vulgar, with lots of Black music and other elements of Black culture mixed into our culture -- and then they sold that image to the American people, first through cinemas and later through television. They persuaded White Americans that this Jewish image of America was a better image than our own. The Jews boast of this transformation of America they made through their control of the motion-picture and television industries.

If you haven't seen this film, you still can read the book it is based on. The book is Neal Gabler's
An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood, and it is available from National Vanguard Books, the publisher of Free Speech.

It is very difficult for the average American to stand up against this flood of Jewish propaganda which clamors for ever more "diversity" and intimidates most of those who would like to stop the flow of Haitians, Chinese, Vietnamese, and Soviet Jews into America. As long as White Americans still have the option of moving to a Whiter neighborhood or sending their children to a Whiter school, they'll choose that option rather than make a fuss and be considered rude by speaking out against the insane immigration policies of the government in Washington. It's too bad we're that way. It just means that our future will be much bloodier and more painful than necessary.

9/07/2009 11:29:00 PM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

It's really nothing new, and it's not restricted to "HBD". The age-old, unwavering principle behind this behavior is "is it good for jews".

Lawrence Auster wants Whites to serve israel and jewish interests in general, but he's hostile to HBD and "bio-cons" in general. He imagines and rants against a vast darwinian-anti-semitic conspiracy. He spins all kinds of rationalizations for this, but none rings as plain or as true as "it's not good for jews".

9/16/2009 10:27:00 AM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

At Yahoo! Year in Review 2009 - Farewells, Kennedy is eulogized without any mention of his mendacious contribution to the demographic transformation of the US into a latin-style third world shithole, but instead is perversely credited for championing the very people his genocidal immigration policies harmed most:

The "Lion of the Senate" championed the cause of working Americans in his fight for minimum wage and universal health care, a fight that didn't falter after his diagnosis of a malignant brain tumor. Beloved by the left and reviled by the right, his presence was felt in the current health care debate.

12/01/2009 10:38:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home