A Guide to "Racist" Guilt-Tripping
Primate in Chief: A Guide to Racist Obama Monkey Photoshops by Abe Sauer, 19 April 2011:
Omitting more of his cornucopia of "outrageous" Obama-ape images, Sauer continues:
Back in March Sauer got his snarky New York jew panties all in a bunch about the crime of calling someone a "Coastie", which he oh-so-soberly described as "cultural intolerance and antisemitism".
Sauer typifies the jewish "liberal" vein of thought: hypersensitive to and offended by all insulting stereotypes or labels, except those they delight in directing at Whites. As I intimated in Planet of the Michelle Obama Defenders, which Sauer linked but otherwise ignored, their ideal is a caustic, irreverent, unflinching, uncompromising culture of critique from which jews and select proxies are exempt and protected.
The image above is supplied by The Yeshiva World, representing the jewish schwarze/chimpout.com vein of thought in which the deification of Obama and blacks in general does not serve jewish interests.
People are outraged—outraged!—that a senior GOP official from Orange County, CA sent an email about Barack Obama that questioned his place of birth. But we've all become so numb to the "birther" conspiracies that the outrage wasn't at all about the absurdity of a party official confronting the president of the United States about some conspiracy theory. The outrage was about an attached photo, depicting Obama as an ape.Sauer's samples of "outrageous" Obama-ape images omitted.
Anyone who has been on the real Internet knows that the Obama-as-ape Photoshop actually predates the mainstream talk about his birth certificate. How prevalent is it? Very. Here's a collection of artwork depicting the nation's first-ever African American president as a primate, which builds on a long history of various racist Obama caricatures.
"Chimpout" is a notorious white supremacist site with a robust collection of images like the two above, which happen to be more reserved compared to others. Of course, the "Obamas as primates" theme and the fundamental (and admitted) racism of the site is a coincidence.(I think this answers Incogman's question: Is CHIMPOUT.com Jew-Infested?)
Update: Chimpout wanted to let people know more about their site. It is...not a white supremacist website. We accept membership from Asians, Hispanics, Anglo, Indians, Arabs, Jews etc... We have a diverse membership and even our administration multi-racial. The purpose of chimpout.com is to expose the huge disproportionate amount of black crime including rape and murder in relation to the percentage of population.So there you go.
We do not allow violent rhetoric, Nazi propaganda or other white nationalist garbage on our site.
We exist only to report the huge numbers of black crimes that get swept under the carpet by the mainstream media.
We do of course have our jokes and photo-shops but they are just for amusement. We really think much too highly of apes than to seriously compare them to blacks.
Omitting more of his cornucopia of "outrageous" Obama-ape images, Sauer continues:
When confronted, the Orange County GOP official insisted the image was not at all racist. There exists a rich vein on the Internet of conservative blog posts that don't seem to understand at all why comparing Barack Obama to a primate is racist, while comparing George Bush to one is not racist. This is a conversation that is still going on.This is Sauer's small, sarcastic contribution to the hundreds of years jews have spent guilt-tripping Whites. To Sauer "racist" is both weapon and shield - a magic word that serves to protect blacks while bashing Whites. Point and sputter at the stupid, evil "conservatives", "Tea Partiers", "birthers", "racists" - that's Sauer's whole argument.
See, when Bush was president, apparently some upset person or people created a wealth of George W. Bush monkey Photoshops. The argument from many on the right here is that because of this, a hundred years of racist sentiment comparing Africans and African Americans to primates is negated.
And then... no, wait, that's the whole argument.
Back in March Sauer got his snarky New York jew panties all in a bunch about the crime of calling someone a "Coastie", which he oh-so-soberly described as "cultural intolerance and antisemitism".
Sauer typifies the jewish "liberal" vein of thought: hypersensitive to and offended by all insulting stereotypes or labels, except those they delight in directing at Whites. As I intimated in Planet of the Michelle Obama Defenders, which Sauer linked but otherwise ignored, their ideal is a caustic, irreverent, unflinching, uncompromising culture of critique from which jews and select proxies are exempt and protected.
The image above is supplied by The Yeshiva World, representing the jewish schwarze/chimpout.com vein of thought in which the deification of Obama and blacks in general does not serve jewish interests.
26 Comments:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q=george%20bush%20as%20a%20chimpanzee&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&biw=1579&bih=699
Too bad I'm not Jewish.
Abe Sauer
"ALL humans are primates."
One order the primate order. Don't give 'em a free one, they just might take it.
"racist sentiment comparing Africans and African Americans to primates"
The people who try hardest to imagine everybody is actually equal are the "conservatives" Sauer and friends regard as less than human.
Good luck in our increasingly diverse future, you bunch of uncreative racist slobs. Our nation has has managed to move forward despite you.
Abe Sauer
Come now Abram. Nobody believes you dislike uncreative black or jewish slobs. You demonize "racists"/"conservatives"/"Tea Partiers"/"birthers", by which you mean Whites and Whites alone, and you just can't be honest about it.
Some great dialogue at Auster's today, continuing Tan's theme on what's good for Whites and Auster when it comes to Blacks etc is not good for Whites and Auster when it comes to Jews.
Post here: How the rule of Minority Supremacy is enforced by white people--on their own minds".
Reader James says:
... you are very sharp to point out that the thoughtcrime has now gone well beyond saying "nigger" or harboring any negative feelings towards blacks. It is now impermissible to think about blacks, as a distinct group with group attributes, at all (although, of course, most blacks think about themselves this way constantly).
Why might this be?
I believe it is because, if whites were able to think about blacks as blacks, then they would, in short order, begin to conceptualize THEMSELVES as a coherent group--with a culture, with a polity, with interests, with strengths and weaknesses, some in need of improvement, some worthy of defense--and, if whites were to begin to do this, it would end the world as it now exists.
Auster replies:
Try to imagine the mental state of a white person who is toiling in the conflict you describe. He has negative thoughts about black violence, black job performance, black racial preferences, black anti-white racism, and so on, but he can never speak these thoughts aloud, and he can never even allow himself to think them clearly to himself. Even I, who have written a fair amount about the phenomenon of white guilt, cannot fully picture to myself what it's like to live day to day in such falsity, to be always maneuvering and negotiating inside one's own head between certain thoughts that one has and the absolute imperative not to speak or think those thoughts because they are evil.
Imagine going one step further and thinking such things about the Jews and all that they have done, as a group, to make Whites think this way. Why, that would be "anti-semitic". No greater evil than that can a White man comprehend. So of course we continue to pretend we are nothing. If we were to think of ourselves as a group, distinct to all including Jews we would surely have sunk to Dante's levels of hell, which Auster loves to quote, and from which there is no redemption.
Good luck in our increasingly diverse future
Increasingly poor, dysfunctional, unproductive, tyrannical, fractious, Third World future.
Nitwit.
Tan,
What you have said above about Auster applies to Fjordman too.
Recently he has virtually posted an entire article in the comments section of Mangan’s. Like the Captain, I have promised not to post at Mangan’s again, but I am tempted to respond this recent post by Fjordman there.
Although I have tried to engage Fjordman at Gates of Vienna about the JQ, he simply ignores the issues. Like Baron Bodissey he shuns our arguments (they didn’t say a peep when in good faith Fellist offered them PDFs of MacDonald’s trilogy). At least Auster, although their replies to your criticism are not replies but smokescreen and mirrors, tried to say something about your articles. The same with Seiyo. Fjordman doesn’t even try: he flatly ignores the problems presented by the JQ even when addressing him directly.
What I hate the most among whites is dishonesty out of cowardice, and Fjordman and the, ehem, the “Baron” exemplify it.
I can understand ethnocentric self-deception among the Jews, e.g. the sophistry of Auster and Takuan Seiyo when they debated you. I don’t like it but I understand it: their takiya is “good for the Jews”. But dishonesty out of cowardice among whites who fancy themselves as crusaders is something that really revolts me: it makes me hate. With such defenders of Western civilization who needs enemies?
Fjordman is a coward, an intellectual coward. Fred Scrooby noticed it a few years ago at MajorityRights. Time to debunk him before the public eye...
P.S. Forgot to click on the "follow up" square.
I miss Fred Scrooby's withering, uncompromising, spot on commentary.
Fred (Scrooby)!
Where are you?
Wasn't Fred driven away by trolls who mocked him for having supposed Jewish ancestry?
I miss Fred Scrooby's withering, uncompromising, spot on commentary.
Yeah. He just up and vanished too.
I like to think that maybe he's just taking a break and will be back sometime. He was a regular reader and commenter on blogs for several years running. I imagine you get burnout after so long.
Wasn't Fred driven away by trolls who mocked him for having supposed Jewish ancestry?
When the man himself admits that both his grandmothers were Jewish, that goes some way beyond "supposed," wouldn't you say?
Fair enough.
But they were still stupid trolls who acted in a highly counterproductive manner.
Scooby was hardly my idea of a subversive Hebrew.
Even Tan, hardly a friend of the Jews, agrees.
Are you sure Scooby said both his grandmothers were Jewish?
If so, were they both full blooded Jews or perhaps rather half-Jews?
Scooby never seemed fully half-Jewish to me.
I think Fred had one jewish grandmother. Since he relentlessly highlighted jewish double standards its hard to see how his activities in any way furthered jewish interests.
This is one of the most outrageous and ridiculous posts I've read in my life (on Auster's blog). I don't know exactly if I should burst out laughing or smash the screen of the computer. The Germans as nation-wreckers! You know, that occupied country since WWII where the slightest sign of patriotism (or common-sense) can send you to prison, the people that support EU (and Israel) with their taxes and hard work because they are OBLIGED to do so, the most humiliated and hated nation in the world because they dared to touch once in their history the Chosen. The Germans, exporters of liberalism! Wow, and the Jews learned liberalism from them!
Reality is just the opposite of what Auster says. See this cartoon of NS Germany that I placed when republishing a stupendous article by Kerry Bolton, who concludes: “Today the Russians are surely the best-informed people in the world on Jewish matters, a legacy maintained since Soviet days.”
Auster's game must be exposed and his credibility destroyed. He is a despicable enemy who has dedicated his life to fighting against the justice of our cause and for the aggrandizement of his race in a most subtle and pernicious way.
From the linked article
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/019287.html
Auster:
"One way or another, whether in their Nazi form or in their hyper-liberal form, the Germans pose a determined threat to the nations and peoples of the West. To paraphrase Churchill's famous remark about the Germans, they need to be kept at our feet, or else they will go for our throat.
I am not being extreme or "anti-German" when I say that. The Germans agree with me."
Okay, then.
In that case:
One way or another, whether in their Communist form or their Neocon form, the jews pose a determined threat to the nations and peoples of the West. To paraphrase Ford's famous remark about the jews: Jews have always controlled Hollywood. The movies in America and Canada are under the control of, both as executives and financiers, the Jewish manipulators, who are ruining our nation's morals.
I am not being extreme or "anti-Semite" when I say that. Jews agree. Joel Stein: "Jews totally run Hollywood!"
To requote Harry Dean Stanton from Inland Empire "Fruitloop is an inadequate description of it."
Auster is having another episode that Tan has described where "one portion of his duplicitous, self-deceptive consciousness delights in ratting out the other". The incipient rage and hatred of another White people is on show for all to see, and what a frothing bile spewing monstrosity it is!
Notice too that whenever Auster has one of these episodes of bi-cameral argument in public his body shuts down with a physical ailment. Also, I have yet to write a reply to Manfred Kleine-Hartlage’s article, “From a German Point of View: A Reply to Lawrence Auster,” which was posted at Gates of Vienna on Sunday. Because of medical issues, it is difficult for me to gather the energy to write a response to a long article. But the discussion is a worthwhile one, and I will attempt to do so soon.
The mental anguish and internal eternal maddening dialogue, erupting uncontrollably in full public view resolves itself with a full blown physical breakdown. This is more than a fruitloop - this is a man caught between two worlds, two minds, good vs evil, hatred vs love, like a skizophrenic raging at passing cars on a streetcorner: Auster is the epitome of the tortured soul.
You can just picture him at his imaginary rostrum banging it with each word: Germany - must! not! rule!...PERIOD!!!! //thunderous applause goes off in his head, as the masses rise to their feet in hailing salute//
Every evil thought from his left brain comes snaking out in hissing venom, The Germans!: pose a determined threat, they need to be kept at our feet, or else they will go for our throat, Germany must not rule, period.
Exhausted by his paroxysms of hate, and seeing the carnage about him, gently prodded by his startled fan club, Auster slowly hoses down the firestorm he started:
I don't see this as an anti-German statement. I have nothing against Germans. I like and admire Germans. I want Germans to be happy and not guilty any more about Nazism. Germany has much to contribute to the world. I see it as a realistic statement that the world is better off when Germany does not have too much power.
I wonder how many Jews are just like him?
Great comment Pat.
I've made a post about Auster's latest spasm: Who's To Blame for Anti-White Governance
"Why aren't Japanese conservatives obsessed with Islam?"
The answer is completely predictable: Because you're a morally and mentally defective jew-hater.
Wasn't George W Bush depicted as a simian?
Is there one set of laws for a Democrat and another for Republicans?
Post a Comment
<< Home