A Personal Disclosure
I have generally avoided discussing details of my personal life on this blog. I don't wish to change that, but there is something I feel obligated to divulge.
My wife's father was an ashkenazi jew. He died when she was young but was by all accounts a loving, intelligent, and productive man who was not involved in stereotypically jewish politics or activism. My wife was not raised as a jew, though she is of course genetically 1/2 ashkenazi, and thus our children are, on average, genetically 1/4 ashkenazi.
I have not previously written of this for several reasons.
When I first started blogging in 2005 it seemed no more relevant to what I was thinking and writing than any other detail of my personal life. At that time I had no explicit racial awareness. I knew little about jews and considered them "white". People who thought otherwise seemed insane to me.
In 2007, with a deepening understanding of globalization and immigration, and especially neo-conservative hypocrisy (Sailer's "invade the world, invite the world"), I began to violate PC in earnest. I became racially aware. I realized then that my wife and children's jewish heritage was relevant, though at that time I saw it only as a potential shield from smears of "anti-semitism". I did not use it then for the same reason I have never resorted to "some of my best friends are..." defenses. Such tactics are a distraction, ultimately a waste of time and energy.
Since 2007 I have come to appreciate the biological and psychological differences between Whites and jews, as well as the history of jewish aggression and malfeasance against Whites. What I had seen as a shield turned into an achilles heel. I cared less about offending jews and more about offending fellow Whites. My self-regard shifted from confidence to unease.
I love my family. What I want stands. I can't roll back time and make this revelation sooner, but I can at least be forthright about it from here on.
My wife's father was an ashkenazi jew. He died when she was young but was by all accounts a loving, intelligent, and productive man who was not involved in stereotypically jewish politics or activism. My wife was not raised as a jew, though she is of course genetically 1/2 ashkenazi, and thus our children are, on average, genetically 1/4 ashkenazi.
I have not previously written of this for several reasons.
When I first started blogging in 2005 it seemed no more relevant to what I was thinking and writing than any other detail of my personal life. At that time I had no explicit racial awareness. I knew little about jews and considered them "white". People who thought otherwise seemed insane to me.
In 2007, with a deepening understanding of globalization and immigration, and especially neo-conservative hypocrisy (Sailer's "invade the world, invite the world"), I began to violate PC in earnest. I became racially aware. I realized then that my wife and children's jewish heritage was relevant, though at that time I saw it only as a potential shield from smears of "anti-semitism". I did not use it then for the same reason I have never resorted to "some of my best friends are..." defenses. Such tactics are a distraction, ultimately a waste of time and energy.
Since 2007 I have come to appreciate the biological and psychological differences between Whites and jews, as well as the history of jewish aggression and malfeasance against Whites. What I had seen as a shield turned into an achilles heel. I cared less about offending jews and more about offending fellow Whites. My self-regard shifted from confidence to unease.
I love my family. What I want stands. I can't roll back time and make this revelation sooner, but I can at least be forthright about it from here on.
posted by Tanstaafl at 1/14/2010 04:54:00 PM
65 Comments:
Interesting revelation. Thanks for sharing.
You deserve a lot of respect for never using this fact in the "some-of-my-best-friends-are-Jewish" manner.
(Hope your personal revelations and public writings haven't put a strain on your marriage. :-/ )
All the best,
Cordelia
Mazel tov!
Any reasonable man will accept this and move on. You deal in facts and that is commendable during ths sorry age, which you aptly describe in your blogs title. I certainly hope that this was not done under duress.
My great grandfather was an Ashkenazi Jew who converted to Roman Catholicism. The rest of my ancestry is Irish and Scottish, the Irish dominant.
I have learned a hell of a lot from blogs like yours (like you "I had no explicit racial awareness" and no idea of the power that Jews hold in our nations). One of the reasons I have never commented on any blog like yours is because always at the back of my mind is the thought that White Nationalism may ultimately lead to not just me, but my children coming under attack solely because of some genetic link to Jews.
I find it troubling, as it sounds like you do.
Personally I do not understand why White Nationalism and opposition to inordinate Jewish control and involvement at the upper echelons in our nations must result in some sort of extermination programme against them.
Perhaps I am biased due to my own ancestry and the fears I have for my children. But logically I don't see why one must follow the other. Why opposing Jewish power necessarily must result in an exterminationist programme against them.
Further, I think this notion is a liability to any White movement.
As a matter of fact I was going to ask you some time ago whether you are opposed to any White person with any Jewish ancestry being involved in the White movement. I suppose now is the time, though be assured that I am not taking advantage of this revelation as some sort of backing you into a corner. I don't expect you to answer of course if you don't wish to. I am not taking advantage of this post other than, I feel in a similar position to you.
I followed the interview between Hunter Wallace and the White Southerner, as well as the Linder Wallace debate. I agree with a lot of what Linder has to say but I am flabbergasted by the demand that Wallace prove himself as worthy of The Cause by extolling the virtues of some genocidal programme against the Jews.
I take their point that the effect of Jewish control is genocide against Whites. I agree with that position. But it is not as if all Jews are lock step in this pogrom. I am quite certain from what I see, read, watch and experience that certain Jewish groups and individuals are deliberately conniving to undermine our nations. But not all Jews are doing so and more importantly, there is nothing the Jews can do that we don't or haven't let them do.
To my thinking it is too simplistic an explanation to sheet home all blame for our nation's problems to the Jews.
Our own fellow Whites have also contributed. Whether they are useful fools is neither here nor there. The majority of them aren't foolish and know exactly what they are doing. The destruction of the White West is not a goal of certain Jewish groups and individuals alone. It is a goal of many White groups and individuals, as well as Black and Asian.
I have found your blog liberating in that I first heard the notion that doing something in OUR, i.e. White interests has nothing to do with any other race or culture. It doesn't mean we are anti-semitic, it means we are doing what every other race and culture does - acting in our interests.
If anyone objects to us acting in our interests then it is obvious who is the racist (not that I believe in the term), it is obvious who is opposing White Nationhood. They are.
That is the direction I believe the White movement is better served. I see no reason to make war unless war is declared. Firstly I think it is best to develop a movement that acts in our interests and answer, as above, to those who object - "What is wrong with us acting in our interests." It is a game changer I believe.
Anyway, thanks for all your blogging efforts so far and I hope that they continue. All power to you.
Pat said: "[L]ogically I don't see why one must follow the other. Why opposing Jewish power necessarily must result in an exterminationist programme against them."
The one absolutely does not follow logically from the other. And, personally, I would not have any part in any sort of "exterminationist programme" against anybody.
To my thinking it is too simplistic an explanation to sheet home all blame for our nation's problems to the Jews. Our own fellow Whites have also contributed.
Absolutely.
That's quite a revelation, Tanstaafl.
Does your wife know your positions on race and jews? Do you consider her to be a jew? It's hard for me to understand how you hold your positions on jews if your wife is jewish.
pat writes:
As a matter of fact I was going to ask you some time ago whether you are opposed to any White person with any Jewish ancestry being involved in the White movement.
I'm not opposed to anyone I believe is earnestly seeking to advance White interests. The problem with semi-jews is that they are typically more concerned with jewish interests. Compounding this problem is their typical inability to be forthright about it.
If anyone objects to us acting in our interests then it is obvious who is the racist (not that I believe in the term), it is obvious who is opposing White Nationhood. They are.
That is the direction I believe the White movement is better served. I see no reason to make war unless war is declared. Firstly I think it is best to develop a movement that acts in our interests and answer, as above, to those who object - "What is wrong with us acting in our interests." It is a game changer I believe.
Yes, we will debate and pursue our interests, and those who oppose this reveal themselves as enemies. The war however is already underway, and has been for centuries. Many of our kind have been beguiled or blackmailed into taking themselves out of the fight. A small but powerful minority are actively allied with the enemy.
tnw writes:
Does your wife know your positions on race and jews?
Yes.
Do you consider her to be a jew?
Jews don't consider her jewish, she doesn't consider herself jewish, and I don't consider her jewish. That said, Whites like myself distrust jews and semi-jews for good reason. She understands this.
It's hard for me to understand how you hold your positions on jews if your wife is jewish.
I'm aware of the significance of Esther.
I understand why it is hard for you to understand. It has to do with putting jews on a pedestal, considering them and their interests more important than our own. I remember, to my shame, that I used to do that. I don't do it any more.
Well, your kids are protected I guess. What about ours?
I don't see any signs of creeping Austerism.
Cheers!
I don't see any signs of creeping Austerism.
Me neither!
O/T
There has been talk of a MLK day money bomb for the American Third Position Party so I whipped up some sidebar ad designs. You can see and improve them here...
http://www.nationofcowards.us/?p=3976
Thanks!
No one wants to exterminate or eliminate anybody but what do you with Jews?
At last acknowledge the wisdom of the Catholic Church in confining Jews to ghettos to minimise the damage.
Tan, Many of us in the US, and other countries, too, have no idea of what our genetic heritages are. I am one of those.
What I do know is that I am American. I am White. I always have been. I always will be.
I know that jews are responsible for the undesireable changes in America and that they have taken over the government, which now operates in the interest of jews and in the interests of Israel. Our formerly American government acts, not for the vital interests of America, but for those of the jews above, and for their leaders, the Rothschilds and the international bankers of the NWO.
A jewish daughter for a wife (1/2 jewish) doesn't place anyone in the category of being anti-American or anti-White. There are many so-called (braindead) whites who are a worse problem than some jews. Some jews have learned that being an American is better than being jewish, and themselves resist the jew leaders, while many of the braindead whites don't understand anything about anything and go right along with actions detrimental to Whites and Amercians, to the harm of us all.
You've divulged what you wanted to divulge, and you don't have to apologize to anyone. Concentrate on continuing to do what you do so well, and that is exposing those who are hiding their jewishness in order to use it against Whites and the true Americans.
You are my friend and you will continue having my trust.
Flanders
We may even be in the process of creating an entirely new race or ethnic group on earth - in time the peoples of the Americas will be a new racial amalgam of Whites, Jews, Hispanics, Asians, and Blacks.
The USA is absolutely crawling with Jews - there are probably at least 20-30 million full-blooded and/or partial Jews living in the USA and Canada, maybe even more than that (50 million?).
This is absurd. What evidence do you have to support the claim that over 10% and possible up to 25% of white Americans are Jewish? The Jewish percentage is this high only in places like New York, South Florida, and Los Angeles. The rest of the country is not at all like those areas.
Dear Sir:
According to history, the MOTHER is the determiner of 'Jewishness' in Talmudic Judaism. Thus, since your wife's mother was not Jewish, neither are your children or your mate!
Moreover, if they don't hold 'as a cloak of unrighteousness' the false mental or ethnic 'privilege' of being a Deicide, the grace of CHrist is able to clean away even this stain.
I know Jews who converted to Christianity, who are as little Jews as I am- even one whose parents left Germany in 1938. THis person is a devout Christian, yet whose face resemble Margaret Hamilton in Wizard of Oz (the Wicked Witch). THe only stumbling block to talking with such, is the denial of 'specialness' attendant to 'Holocaustianity.' In such situations, I will not 'cause a brother or sister to stumble' on my account, if they can't see that the 'Holocaust' is a bunch of lies, simply because they believe 'their own' perished at a greater rate than 'my' ancestors, the Germans who died in Dresden, etc.
- Fr. John
"There has been talk of a MLK day money bomb for the American Third Position Party so I whipped up some sidebar ad designs. You can see and improve them here...
http://www.nationofcowards.us/?p=3976"
Fail!
White Nationalism has a serious marketing problem. We need graphic designers, marketing and media professionals, etc.
Mastery of Style Trumps Superiority of Argument
http://www.toqonline.com/2009/05/mastery-of-style/
You are a rational man, making judgements on the spot. You can't change the past.
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to deal with it." - Patrick Henry
Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson
Subject opinion to coercion: whom will you make your inquisitors? Fallible men; men governed by bad passions, by private as well as public reasons. And why subject it to coercion? To produce uniformity. But is uniformity of opinion desirable? No more than of face and stature.
-- Thomas Jefferson
So when you create the "Jew Free White Ethnostate" that you say you want either you will have to leave your wife and children, or leave the White Ethnostate to be with them. Which choice will you make? Is your love of family greater than your love of the ethnic and racial purity you trumpet?
Considering their are millions of people in America with similar situations (who probably would not like to have to make such choices) doesn't this suggest that perhaps your project needs new goals?
I am more privileged than most of my fellow Americans. When I woke up in the mornings as a kid and walked out of the door, I saw people who WERE Americans. They were White. They were, for the most part, exceptionally moral. (The few Blacks I encountered were, too.). ALL of them had the interests of other White Americans in their hearts and mind.
Unfortunately, a similar presumption applied to others who appeared to be White, though they were known to have propensities favorable only to themselves. Jews did not have the same objectives and were working behind our backs to advance themselves over us. Most of us paid them little heed because life was becoming more bountiful and there was a sense that America was going to expand freedom to all places. We concentrated on what we were doing, not on what they were doing.
That openness extended into the 19 - fifties and sixties. Media suddenly became tools for "change". Teachers began teaching non-American ideas. The state began adopting and enforcing restrictions on liberty while allowing crime to affect everyone. Immigration became about the rights of everyone - except Americans. People changed from being civic-minded Americans into blase' purveyors of selfishness who spewed verbal concern publicly, while supporting military, political and business adventurism which was immoral and unjust. Workplaces turned from being pleasant and comfortable to being vile and stressful.
People who have not lived in the America I knew cannot imagine its goodness. Yet, it has been trashed in less than a lifetime away.
This which has come upon America is a force which has been operating for a much longer time than is evident from my description. I know, now, that a family and group with the power which comes from owning more than 1/2 of the world's money supply has been working with willing jews (and their agents among other races) to bring a destruction on America, as a free nation, and upon all Whites.
Most jews have contributed to those efforts, some openly and others by remaining hidden. All need to be examined for evidence of their loyalties. So do many so-called people from other races, including our own. Before that time, there is work to be done. Too many people are unaware and are trained to be uncaring for the survival of themselves or for ours. Our time is better spent awakening those who are capable of becoming informed and in preparing ourselves for what is coming our way.
Flanders
Zeke writes:
So when you create the "Jew Free White Ethnostate" that you say you want either you will have to leave your wife and children, or leave the White Ethnostate to be with them. Which choice will you make?
I addressed this in the comments of Of Whites, by Whites, and for Whites. What you present is a false dichotomy. Besides that, we're second-class citizens right now.
Considering their are millions of people in America with similar situations (who probably would not like to have to make such choices) doesn't this suggest that perhaps your project needs new goals?
I see the choice for those millions, and the millions more who are entirely White, as between an increasingly dystopian existence under a jewish-led regime of by and for "people of color", or not. I choose not.
"Which choice will you make?"
The Byzantine Empire lasted 1000 years without the jews grabbing power. They did it simply by forbidding jews from holding certain occupations: Government, education, ownership of media.
It seems to me that mischlings who feel, and are willing to demonstrate, loyalty to and sympathy with their White kin ought to be, in our theoretical jew-free ethnostate, allowed to stay. There would have to be some restrictions/agreements with them, of course, but seeing how the White race is being preyed upon by jews, the mischlings ought to be willing to demonstrate their loyalty to their White kin by agreeing to the restrictions.
As some possibilities, perhaps an agreement with the half or quarter mischlings that they must marry full-Whites or remain single. Marrying, or reproducing out of wedlock with, another mischling or full non-White would be grounds for expulsion.
Anti-White activism would be grounds for expulsion.
Must accept certain restrictions on occupations: no government, no education, no media ownership.
By the time the jewishness is diluted to 1/8th, then those offspring are allowed full citizenship and occupational rights.
It seems to me, as we institute our theoretical jew-free ethnostate, the place to START dealing with jewish perfidy is those fully jewish who have married jewish and / or practice judaism and / or have engaged in anti-White activism. THOSE are the people who have declared THEMSELVES our enemies.
But the mischlings who DEMONSTRATE their loyalty to and sympathy with their White kin by agreeing to restrictions, in order that their White kin can thrive, ought to be allowed to stay until and unless they demonstrate anti-White activism/racism.
As I've said before, I think judgments of groups must be of the nature of group judgments, i.e., probablistic in nature with room for individual exceptions and tempered by Christian charity and decency. Self-defense doesn't mean we have to become monsters; the Ivy League quotas of the 1920s did not equal genocide. I also think there is a world of difference of someone who has a distant Jewish blood connection and someone who is essentially seeing himself as a member of the "state within the state" first and only secondarily as an American. I think even when conservatives "name the Jew" it need not be a genocidal or uncompromising across-the-board judgment. If someone wants to disassociate from the self-destructiveness of the "minority tribal" mentality that he is welcome, but obviously we need to rekindle group pride among the white Christian majority.
Truly, you didn't know any better. Having your brain washed in Marxist propaganda has been the Western way for a long time. Look to the future, find the good, work on what can be salvaged.
I addressed [whether your wife & children should be deported] in the comments of Of Whites, by Whites, and for Whites.
I just looked at what you said in that thread, and I'm not quite sure I understand correctly, but it seems that you believe in a white ethnostate defined by blood. So that means you do favor deporting your wife and children?
coldequation writes:
it seems that you believe in a white ethnostate defined by blood. So that means you do favor deporting your wife and children?
No. Between the current anti-White regime and a zero-jewish-genes White ethnostate are many gradations, most of which I'd consider an improvement. Roach's comment (mansizedtarget.com) and the Anonymous comment before his both sound reasonable.
Tan, If your wife is a banker, we will likely change our tunes!!!
More seriously, you may be interested in seeing what our ancestors had to say after THEY deported all the jews, and how the usury system was replaced:
-------
http://globalfire.tv/nj/09en/history/money_medieval_england.htm
"Finally, in 1290 on July 18th a statute was passed by King Edward I (1272-1307) and the House of Commons compelling all Jews* to leave England for ever by November 1st of that year. Any Jews who remained in the kingdom after that date were liable to be executed.
The announcement of the expulsion was greeted with great joy and jubilation throughout the land. Unlike with the modern practice of ethnic cleansing, the Jews after paying a tax of 1/15th of the value of their moveables and 1/10th of their specie were permitted to leave with all their goods and chattels.
With the banishment of the money-lenders and the abolition of usury, we may observe how the finances of the English nation were practised at the different levels of society.
For the individual who wished to buy a house costing, say, £100 he would be required to make a down-payment of £10 and negotiate a loan of £90 from a bank. He would own 10 per cent of the house and the bank would own the remaining 90 per cent. Rent would be payable on the house of which 10 per cent would accrue to himself and the balance of 90 per cent to the bank. The following year he would pay the bank a further instalment of 10 per cent, reducing the bank's ownership to 80 per cent and the amount of rent payable to it. These instalments would be continued until he owned 100 per cent of the property.
In the event of the buyer defaulting on his rent payments he would be evicted. However, he could never lose that portion of the house he had paid for and would continue to receive rent on it. House price inflation was not a factor during this era, as the rate of inflation was zero - as it should be. In any normal society which does not practise usury."
Flanders
It is good you got that off your chest. It doesn’t matter to me though. For example, years back I was a Christian Zionist believing Israel was the best thing since sliced bread and that Jews were sacrosanct.
We change and the things we did while we were under mass brainwashing cannot be taken back. All that matters is the future and that we secure a White nation for future generations so they don't have to go through what we have. The damage that has already been caused by this disaster will be with us the rest of our lives.
Keep on doing your good work Tan.
Here is an interesting site:
http://www.jewornotjew.com/
According to Jew Or Not Jew Scarlett Johansson is half Jewish and David Beckham is a quarter Jewish. So the phenotype can be thoroughly Aryan.
What I'd be more interested in is what was the reaction initially, and what is the reaction now, of your wife and kids to your awakening to racialism, Tanstaafl. And what role the Jewish ancestry thing plays in their reaction, if any.
My own personal experience informs me that it is much easier to flip people on the Jewish question if they already know and trust you.
jewornotjew.com reflects the obsession jews themselves have with who is or isn't jewish. Jews often pretend this is a big joke, or a game, but it isn't. Human personality traits are largely hereditary. Knowing that a person has jewish heritage has predictive and explicative value to jews and non-jews alike.
My wife's initial reaction to my racial awakening was discomfort. She applied some of the same apologia I've heard from philo-semites and anti-anti-semites. "Christians also favor immigration and anti-racism!" "Clinton/Bush/Obama/Kennedy isn't jewish!" We had already both been disappointed with the reaction we received from a few of our friends and extended family members who couldn't abide our growing displeasure with immigration. We were disturbed to find that even people who loved and trusted us could so easily write us off as irrational "haters".
My wife and I have always respected each other's opinions and have been willing to hear each other out. Thus, over time, I was able to address each of her arguments and make my own, supported by copious facts and evidence. Unsurprisingly, it turns out her jewdar is more keen than my own. Nowadays she is just as often the one who points out or speculates about the jewish nature of some pol or pundit.
This blog has been in large part an open journal. It is an extension of discussions and disagreements I have with friends and family who, like myself, have been marinating in pro-jew/anti-White propaganda their whole lives.
My children are still a bit young to comprehend the details, but I don't pull any punches when it comes to explaining my view of the basic mechanics, especially when they encounter the consequences directly or express any interest in understanding (e.g. our relocation, PC at school, Obama, MLK, etc). They are aware one of their grandparents was jewish. They are also aware that their three other grandparents are White.
They know that the current regime we live under is anti-White. Kids have little trouble seeing and acknowledging this once they know you're not going to punish them for noticing. My wife and I don't. We all openly and shamelessly discuss race. As my kids mature I will expect them to find their own paths biopolitically. I am however making sure that they know early on the awful truths about White/jewish relations that I didn't come to understand until I was much older.
I went and read the comments on the older post, but still didn't see the issue of your own wife and kids honestly addressed there. However later comments on this thread have gotten close. You wrote here:
No. Between the current anti-White regime and a zero-jewish-genes White ethnostate are many gradations, most of which I'd consider an improvement.
OK, I understand that. For instance repealing the Civil Rights law so as to allow private establishments and business to discriminate based on race, etc.
But your manifesto "What I want" doesn't envision a better middle state with laws changed, etc, it calls for a fully "Jew free ethnostate".
Yes, we're not there today, but understanding the goal in any endevour is always important. You put this stake in the ground, and you still haven't answered the question several have raised.
Assuming something like the NAR of Covington's novels were created and excluded all persons of mixed racial and Jewish heritage would you leave your wife and kids to move there? Would you argue for some special rules for mixed heritage, as others here have done? Or would you choose to live outside the ethnostate so as to preserve your family?
But your manifesto "What I want" doesn't envision a better middle state with laws changed, etc, it calls for a fully "Jew free ethnostate".
No, that "fully" is your own extremification. You continue to insist on reading "jew-free ethnostate" as "zero-jewish-genes allowed". I grant that's what some Whites may prefer, and that they would exclude my family. Knowing what I know about jews, I don't blame them. You however seem to think I should be disturbed by this. I'm not.
Maybe it will help if I make an analogy.
Certain subgroups of jews are pretty extreme race purists. They look with scorn and don't want to mix even with jews outside their group. This arguing about who's a jew causes resentment and infighting amongst jews, but still they set this squabbling aside and unite under a jew banner when confronting external threats.
One of the many things that distinguishes Whites from jews is that Whites are pathologized for behaving this way, so we don't do it very explicitly any more. We've been brainwashed and browbeaten into not expressing racial solidarity, but the instincts are still there. I don't see any moral or ethical reason why Whites shouldn't behave more like jews do. We can argue about who is White and what's best for Whites and still unite under a White banner against anti-White assholes who threaten us.
Surely jews don't want us to think this way because it isn't good for jews. The problem is that as time goes by more of us can see that doing what jews dictate isn't good for us.
I'm curious. Do you think you're confounding or demoralizing me by asking these probing questions of yours, or have you just not thought very deeply about these things?
I'm curious. Do you think you're confounding or demoralizing me by asking these probing questions of yours, or have you just not thought very deeply about these things?
No, I don't think I'm demoralizing you. I'm honestly just curious. I've thought about the idea for a 'whites only' state since I first read Pierce 20 years ago. I've thought about it enough to think that its not likely to happen, and think the presence of mixed couples, and their offspring, is one of the main stumbling blocks.
I was, frankly, amazed that someone who publically supports such a solution (ethnostate) would himself be potentially an enemy of such a state.
I find the contradtion startling and fascinating. I appreciate your answers to my questions. It's an interesting answer, but assuming that the JFES ever is created I'm not sure it will satisfy the Ministry of Ethnic and Racial Purity very well.
As I recall Pierce had a very low opinion of miscegenation, and all practitioners were hung from lamposts. I'd always thought that most of the people advocating the JFES were basially OK with this proposition. Certianly when I read Convington's "Northwest" books he seems to parrot that idea.
I've always assumed you were closely related to those ideas and movements, so found your revelation pretty shocking.
I now see that you have a seperate, less vicious, less judgemental form of WN that you adhere to. Or at least that is the impression your posts give me.
I apologize if it seems I was trying to bait you. That has not been my intention whatsoever.
bI was (am) genuinly interested in your thinking on this matter. I will grant that you have thought about it a lot more than I have.
I think that your reaction to your own changing paradigm is a moral and pragmatic one. A lot of lessor people over the years have displayed an eerily negative reaction based on their own personal social situation along these lines. I would accept your children into a White Homeland over a piece of "pure white" human crap like brad pitt any day.
I commend you for your honesty and this certainly doesn't lower my opinion of you or your work. The important thing is that you don't have divided loyalties as a result of having a wife of partial Jewish ancestry.
White people are a strange lot; just because they know a handful of nice non-whites or Jews they assume all posses these qualities and cannot bring themselves to believe anything bad about them or view them as suspect.
If people of partial Jewish ancestry identify with whites and white nationalism and act in our best interests then I would welcome them, but the fact is that there just aren't very many of them. There are Jews attempting to infiltrate the ranks of WN for the purpose of misleading and misdirecting it so that it won't threaten Jewish group interests.
Age of Treason. What a fitting name for your blog. A race-mixing, jew-breeding traitor. Shalom!
Tran:
BFD
I mean that...
Perhaps you'll hug your wife a little more tight tonight in bed, now that you get to see more of the human animal. All the better.
What surprises me is why people are surprised when Godless animals behave like liberals. They are one, and the same.
The important thing is where your loyalties lie and only you know that. Others' opinions are irrelevant. But admitting this is therapeutic and demonstrates honesty and forthrightness.
You know what and who you are, all you can do is move onward and upward for your kin and folk.
On Tanstaafl « Antisemitica.
I am glad that being married to someone with Jewish blood hasn't crippled you politically. I had to "unfriend" most of my family on Facebook as my posts were offending them because my cousin is married to a Jew, and because they are Judeo-Christians of course. From what I understand she is not even a Zionist nutcase.
It is rather humorous because my family by and large consider themselves Conservative or Republican, some are outright racists, but the Jewish issue is always untouchable. That's what you call effective propaganda.
Having read your blog every now and then (I love the internet for the possibility of learning about fringe ideas), I only now came across this post, and I must say I am in stitches here. Moreover, I'm a bit disappointed with your commenters' nonchalance about your revelation. Their behavior seems like a sort of unprincipled exception. Only Anonymous at 1/24/2010 08:13:00 AM comes off as a man of principle.
who calmly advocates "separationism" of "whites" from muslims, blacks, and mestizos but flips his yid lid at the suggestion that Whites separate from jews.
So when are you going to leave your yid wife and kids, Mr. Principled?
Can you can keep your lid on long enough to explain what unprincipled exception you
see here, and how it outshines Auster's?
For Auster, an unprincipled exception happens when someone temporarily and without acknowledging it gives up their principles to avoid negative consequences. So here we have a bunch of people who spend their time cataloguing the evil deeds of Jews, obsessing over who is a Jew (or even married to one), and wishing to found a "Jew-free white ethnostate". Yet, upon discovering that one in their midst has a basically Jewish family, they are as if Jewishness was not such a big deal after all.
without acknowledging it gives up their principles to avoid negative consequences
I see how this describes Auster's behavior. I don't see it describing mine.
What have I not acknowledged? What principles have I given up? How am I avoiding negative consequences?
upon discovering that one in their midst has a basically Jewish family, they are as if Jewishness was not such a big deal after all
Neither my wife nor my family is "basically jewish". Is it your belief that half or quarter jewish genes makes a person "basically jewish", or do you presume that myself and all the commenters here should believe this?
If I thought jewishness, even partial jewishness, were not important then I would not have made this disclosure. What seems to vex you is that my behavior and the res
ponse from others does not conform to the caricatures painted by your fruitloopy jewish guru. You should take that up with him.
Surely all White Nationalists understand that the mischling question is more nuanced and difficult than the "anti-racist" (really, anti-non-Jewish White) subversive, self-identifying-as-Jew and/or practicing Judaism, full Jews.
The reason it's nuanced is because SOME mischlings feel empathy for, loyalty to, and identify with and support their White kin and are willing to forsake their Jewish kin in order for their White kin to survive.
For those people we must ask, what is to be done? After all, their White genes are of some value to us.
The answer is, it seems to me, let them DEMONSTRATE to us their support and love for us White kin and their loyalty to us by AGREEING to restrictions on marriage/reproduction and occupation until the Jewishness is fully diluted. The purpose is so that, once the subversive full-Jews are gone, the problem does not re-arise from the actions of mischlings who identify with and placing their loyalties to their Jewishness.
With the above plan, in time, a generation or two, we WILL have an, essentially, Jew-free
state. At least as nearly Jew -free as is possible in view of the mixing that has occurred since Euro Whites and Jews first encountered each other.
Surely 1/8 Jewish is diluted enought to breed out any kinship loyalty to Jews.
If a mischling won't agree to the restrictions, then by his actions he has shown where his loyalties lie and he can go with the full-Jews.
Where's the unprincipled exception in the above? I don't see it.
Having read your blog every now and then (I love the internet for the possibility of learning about fringe ideas), I only now came across this post, and I must say I am in stitches here. Moreover, I'm a bit disappointed with your commenters' nonchalance about your revelation. Their behavior seems like a sort of unprincipled exception. Only Anonymous at 1/24/2010 08:13:00 AM comes off as a man of principle.
And you come off like a smug, smirking wanker (look it up).
What you are reading, Anonymous stealth jew, is not "fringe ideas".
These are the feelings of Americans. That is something you would not know about.
The only fringe is the jewish controlled fringe which keeps mainstream American ideas from the attention of the public.
A very interesting revelation, Tan. My two cents: if I were in the same position, I would consider it trivial so long as my wife understood my position, embraced it (and it sounds like your wife has), and we agreed that WN principles would be passed on to the kids.
Your blog does a world of good for the budding WN movement- keep up the good work!
Suckhole who seeks Fruitloop's pontifical blessing sends grovelling email.
Nice style of blogging. Post lackey emails without initially entering debate, make references to past posts, and wait for other lackeys to provide follow up emails for the master to pontificate ex cathedra upon.
This way he need not sully himself with the intellectually accountable task of having an opinion he is required to defend, but rather can hide behind the comments of others who do his work for him.
In a word gutless.
In another word disingenuous.
A link to Auster's Anti-Semite who seeks "jew free ethno state" is married to half-Jewish woman was provided in an anonymous comment in another thread. I'll reproduce the most sensational portion, the introduction, because Auster has been known to silently edit or remove such things after they have been critiqued.
Richard W. writes:
One of your main on-line critics, the anti-Semitic blogger Tanstaafl, reveals that his wife is one-half Jewish and his children are therefore one-quarter Jewish.
This is very interesting, since in his statement of intent for the blog he declares that his "ultimate goal is a jew-free, White ethnostate in North America."
Presumably, given this revelation, he would not be able to live there with his family. Perhaps his identification with an idealized white race would cause him to abandon his own children? That seems bizarre beyond belief, but these are the types of problems with holding this extreme "genetics determines everything" position of the White Nationalist movement.
It is ironic in the extreme that his fellow white nationaists must now (according to their ideology) condemn TANSTAAFL for race mixing. The more rabid of them dream of hanging him, his children and his wife from lamp posts on the day of retribution for race-traitors (per William Pierce.)
Would it be going too far to call TANSTAAFL a self-hating crypto-Jew? To use an Internet term I'm ROTFLMAO.
The fact of the matter is that my family faces more of a threat from the US government, the ADL, SPLC, or some individual pissed off jew, in a self-righteous attempt to squash "anti-semitism", than we do from "my fellow white nationaists". I'm not surprised that the threats Richard W perceives we face make him laugh, or that Auster copies and publishes those droolings. Their lame psychoanalysis is a window into their own sick minds.
Auster writes "I haven't written about Tanstaafl in a couple of years" and provides a series of links annotated in his inimitably smarmy style. Ever since I argued with him about his First Law he's been very eager to make his readers understand what a serious, serious "anti-semite" I am.
Auster and Anti-Anti-Semitism is my initial challenge and his response.
Criticizing Auster reviews the argument eight months later, after I had gathered quite a bit more evidence and confidence in my position.
Auster has never gotten beyond calling me names.
I didn't know the 4 comments preceding mine, from Jim Jones on, were awaiting moderation when I wrote and posted my link and comments about Auster. Apologies for the delay in letting them through.
Jim, I appreciate your sentiments. Among the reactions here and at Antisemitica it seems, contrary to the ravings of people who hate me, that sympathy and support are the most common.
Hate and hostility is a less common reaction, and some of it comes from people who, for good reason I think, don't trust jews. However, I sense just as much or more hostility coming from people who think their outrage at anyone would dare distinguish Whites from jews justifies whatever conclusions they wish to jump to. In these cases the hypocritical presumption that jewish interests trump everything else is clear, as is the ill-will they direct my way.
Jay Silverheels typifies this pro-jew hostility. Does he consider zionists sickening excuses for human beings? Does he measure Auster, who argues for separationism of "dangerous minorities" from "whites", by the same yardstick? I doubt it. Jewish supremacism is so taken for granted that its proponents seem hardly conscious of it. Jews feel free to distinguish themselves and put their interests above Whites, but anyone who sees this, or worse, takes the opposite view, is to them an insane subhuman monster.
In light of the degrading and dehumanizing way they speak of anyone they label an "anti-semite" I don't find it at all unreasonable to consider people like this a threat. They react just as other "dangerous minorities" do, baring their claws and hissing about how hateful you are for wanting to get away from them.
I don't think I mentioned Auster's Am I an orthographical fifth columnist? when I wrote Fruitloopable Presumption, but I should have. In Anti-Semite who seeks "jew free ethno state" is married to half-Jewish woman he describes that older post as
[About Tanstaafl's attack on me for saying that the word "white" should not be capitalized.]
Last time I read it it included the admission that he actually edits his correspondent's comments to change "White" into "white".
In the title of his latest post he alters the phrase, "jew-free White ethno state", dropping the word White entirely.
This is the same person who condemns others based on their non-response to his "rebuttable presumptions" and failing to capitalize "jew".
What an appalling and sickening excuse for a human being you are, Tanstaafl.
Compared to you Jay? I think not.
Who mentioned slaughter? Only you, sicko.
This way he need not sully himself with the intellectually accountable task of having an opinion he is required to defend, but rather can hide behind the comments of others who do his work for him.
Sounds like LGF!
What you say is simple and reasonable, Tanstaafl, though some people insist on not understanding it.
Best wishes to your family and good health to all your future generations.
- Daybreaker
So, whitish supporters of white nationalism have a chance to put here their easy words in practice: do you support Iran ?
I favor self-determination and self-government for all people, even Iranians, even though they aren't White. Presuming my people can reobtain these things I expect our favor would not extend to governments who determine to war against us. Has the Iranian government determined to war against us?
This question is moot for the moment, because our current domestic government already wages a stealthy but burgeoning war on us.
"Has the Iranian government determined to war against us?"
Are you serious? you speak like a neocons, i.e., a pupet from those very one that you want to denounce.
At least, guys like Dick Cheney knows that Iran or Irak don't want a war against us, that's why they had to make up stories.
Good blog anyway. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
Neocons want me to get worked up about what other people are doing in other countries, thousands of miles away, and ignore what's happening in my own backyard. Which is just like what you're trying to do.
I think you make a mistake, this is my personnal opnion that everything is linked. Iranians, while probably less 'white' than you, are still whites. Iran is therefore a white nationalist nation and I believe this is ultimately the main reason that they are targeted. "No white nationalism must remain". I remind you that to be a Nation, you need some Nationalism, there is no turn around. The US has abandonned nationalism for imperialism and therefore the US is less and less a Nation and more and more an imperial inform conglomerate.
Everything that weakens Iran will, in return, weaken your white nationalist aspirations here at home.
Iranians have their own culture and they want to keep it. They don't like many aspects of our culture and we don't like theirs. Fine. At the end, our core values are much closer than those of our 'friends' saoudis or...you know who. Anyway, if you really think that americans can resolve their problem at home ALONE and indenpendantly of other countries, I won't convince you.
You haven't expressed any interest in helping Americans. You're lobbying for support for Iran. In that regard you're like a jew whose interest is in recruiting support for Israel. Go do it someplace else.
Dear Tan,
please allow me also a comment. I read your post as a translation on As der Schwerter (Ace of Swords) in German and I read fully through the comments.
While the majority of commentors are as decent and honorable as I expect from every Aryan man - and let me please at this point include that I have great respect and admiration for your wife, who - unusual for a woman - sets instincts and emotion aside and accepts the truths as they are and sticks loyally to our justified cause; I nevertheless wanted to adress the few super-human costume nazi people that attack you.
You know, if we are to stand in comparison to our glorious ancestors, we are basically all worthless and laughable. It may sound like typical jewish psycho-demoralizing propaganda but it is true. People speaking here about "principles". I must laugh about anyone using that word. 300 Spartans before the armies of the East, THAT was principles. Jose Moscardo at the the Alcazar of Toledo, THAT was principles.
I met countrymen of mine when I collected money for the veteran's graves in Germany, they were so shy and mannered and humble yet they fought in the armed forces of the SS, or went by foot all the way to Moscow and back or spent five years in Sibiria throwing bonesack-emaciated dead comrades into grave pits in prison camps or grandmothers who built up families after their parents had been murdered in the Great Terror and had suffered unspeakable things at the hands of the bolshevik subhuman and yet the NEVER complained and only told all this after me asking them.
Or to take less martialic examples what about great inventors like the telephone inventor Philipp Reis who just gave his revolutionary invention to the world more or less as a gift to humankind as opposed to betrayer and liar Bell who just stole his telephone from the humble Mr. Elisha Gray. These are stories about principles.
Sitting before the computers and building castles in the air, hoping that it will be much whiter than that of your fellow WN has nothing to do with principles. All this constructions like "would you leave your wife if she was jewish?" - seriously, what is this nonsense heading for? Some more of the satanic Old Testament sadism of El Shaddai/Jehova testing Abraham if he would kill his son in service of "God"? Some more demonic initiation? No Aryan man with the least little bit of honor would ever do that, instead accepting his fate as given and deal with it like a man.
Like the Nibelungen with dark hero Hagen in their midst that they would never hand over to the enemy even it would spare them from gruesome death and even bloodless "morale" would allow it. That is Nibelungen fidelity, that is Orpheus' fidelity, that is ETHICS.
Tan, you are honest and respectable, you do not need to justify yourself and your wife before any of us. We are not the veteran council of Starship Troopers that builds up the new Republic with watchful eyes, because we have not fought or proven ourselves.
Please, I can not hear this talking, this whining about principles anymore. Principles must be LIVED not talked about like castrates, scholars and politicians do.
Like Manowar sang: "With dreams to be a king one first should be a man..."
Tan,
I think if you excise references to Starship Troopers and Manowar, but at least Manowar, the last comment is a lovely coda to this old affair. German in the very highest sense ...
-uh
After stopping by to essentially say "Fuck you, Tan" Ward saw fit to append his comment with a pithy reminder to Tan's readers to "Buy my book".
Apparently the animals that lived with Ward in the barn which he was raised taught him nothing of tact. LOL
Ward: It can be reconciled because many of us are able to make exceptions as we see fit. That you cannot is your problem.
the good people of the Earth finally gain control
I'm not frightened by this. Why are you? Already excluded, I'm not much concerned about a potential future in which I might be excluded.
where is your loyalty, to your Race, or to your wife and children?
To myself, my immediate family, my extended family - nation, race, species, life the universe and everything else - in that order.
This stuff isn't complicated. The current anti-White judeo-liberal regime encourages Whites to fret about and secure the existence of anybody or anything BUT themselves and their families. It pathologizes and demonizes the White race. Meanwhile jews and other non-Whites are encouraged to secure their existence and generally are not pathologized or demonized as "racists" for attempting to do so. This status quo is far less defensible than any position I've ever advocated.
Post a Comment
<< Home