If Hasan Were White
Contrast this...Obama: Hasan May Have ‘Cracked’ From ‘Stress’ | The FOX Nation
On Fort Hood shooting, Obama says: Do not jump to conclusions | Jerusalem Post
with this...
Round Up Hate-Promoters Now, Before Any More Holocaust Museum Attacks - CBS News, by Bonnie Erbe.
The Big Hate - NYTimes.com, by Paul Krugman.
- - -
If Major Nidal Malik Hasan were White these people wouldn't hesitate to recognize and denounce his motives. Likewise if James von Brunn had been a palestinian muslim. The one constant is that when jews perceive a threat to jewish interests, the conclusions they jump to get aired, no matter how insane, illiberal, or insensitive, and usually without any challenge or retraction. When there is no direct threat to jewish interests, as with the Fort Hood attack, then defending against indirect threats to minority privilege (the presumption that non-Whites, including jews, are disadvantaged) and dual loyalty (it's ok to be a jew or muslim first) is paramount.
There is no need to jump to conclusions about the anti-White regime. Pay attention to its reaction to any particular clash of White and non-White interests and the conclusions jump out all by themselves.
Labels: anti-white, barack obama, bonnie erbe, james von brunn, jihad, nidal malik hasan, paul krugman
posted by Tanstaafl at 11/10/2009 09:41:00 PM
12 Comments:
Shooting at North Hollywood synagogue investigated as hate crime; man detained [Updated] | L.A. NOW | Los Angeles Times.
This incident occurred less than two weeks ago. Within an hour and 36 minutes the LAT and/or the LAPD were jumping to the conclusion it was a "hate crime", apparently on the basis that the presumed victims were jews.
Later that evening the story appeared with a similar headline on HuffPo, L.A. Synagogue Shooting Investigated As Hate Crime, Man Detained, despite the fact that police were quoted saying:
"We certainly recognize the location and we're sensitive to that," Deputy Police Chief Michel Moore said. "But we do not know that this was a hate crime at all."
People at the scene were confused:
"Maybe it was crazy person," Oz told the Los Angeles Times. "Maybe he was drugged up. Maybe it was a Jew. We don't know."
Initial security camera footage from the synagogue shows the suspect but not the shooting, and the quality is too poor for investigators to identify the man
There hasn't been a peep on google news since the day after the attack.
Agreed Rusty. And our fruitloopy faux-White "friend" Auster said as much in Why Jews Welcome Muslims.
This quote is from:
http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/%E2%80%9Cinglourious-basterds%E2%80%9D-comes-to-fort-hood/
--------
“Since the Mossad had all the security arrangements in hand, it would not be a problem bringing the killers as close as they wanted to President Bush and then staging his assassination. In the ensuing confusion, the Mossad people would kill the ‘perpetrators,’ scoring yet another victory for the Mossad. With the assassins dead, it would be difficult to discover where the ‘security breach’ had been, except that several countries involved in the conference, such as Syria, were regarded as countries that assisted terrorists.”
—Ex-Mossad officer Victor Ostrovsky, describing in his book ‘The Other Side of Deception’ how the Mossad planned to assassinate President George Bush at the Madrid peace conference in October of 1991 for the purpose of blaming it on Arab extremists.
Those who know me are now doubt asking themselves confidently–“Ok, how long before he blames this latest atrocity on the Jews?”
-------
There are many people who are asking good questions about this incident. Note the comments section, too. Whether planned or not, it is going to be used for nefarious purposes, all against freedoms and liberties of ordinary Americans - Whites.
There are so many contradictions to normal operating proceedure in official and media handling of this matter that it baffles the mind. How many of the general public will simply accept the contradictions without question and how fragmented will those who do not accept "official" versions become from each other?
Flanders
Another article, Synagogue shooting unnerves Los Angeles -- latimes.com, tells us a couple of things. First, when two jews are wounded in LA, the mayor himself feels compelled to make a public statement, if only to say that "it was a random act of violence". Second, that when two jews are wounded in LA, whether by "hate crime" or "random act of violence", it unnerves the entire city.
So much for "all men are created equal".
There hasn't been a peep on google news since the day after the attack.
Same goes for that story about the guy who was threatening to bomb the white house and who got into the several-hour standoff with SWAT in LA a few months ago. After his identity, and apparently Jewish background, was revealed, the story disappeared. Poof!
Brilliantly succinct summary and a revealing comparison. I saw Hank Sheinkopf on the last Lou Dobbs tonight. The topic was what can be discussed. For Sheinkopf anything about separation by race or religion was off the table. Same for the two black commentators. This was absolute.
Democratic Strategist (as he is billed) Sheinkopf of course was taking the only solution for white existence off the table up front. They had Lou 3 to 1 and it was clear as our relative numbers go down, we go down. We have no say except when we are in the majority and then we are finished.
That is we have no say when we are not in the majority. Then its South Africa farm murders like Anne Pressly already. It was a chilling exchange.
Thanks for the heads up OAL.
Compare and contrast Sheinkopf's attitude toward Hasan (November 11, 2009):
DOBBS: Let's turn to the Ft. Hood murders. There's great agitation in some quarters of the national media as to whether or not this is terrorism. And the fact that the media's done something of a disservice to fallen soldiers. What's your reaction?
SHEINKOPF: One lunatic with a weapon, who had an opportunity, and it's a great tragedy and my heart goes out to the great fighting men and women who lost their lives. That's it.
and von Brunn (June 10, 2009):
DOBBS: . . .
Hank, let's start with one of the frustrating aspects of this tragedy today, this man is so well known to almost everyone who could have done something, at least it appears to have stopped it.
HANK SHEINKOPF, DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST: That is the problem of a democracy in the very gift. People can say and do anything and not to be arrested or harassed by law enforcement because they have beliefs that we find onerous. But we really should start this Lou.
. . .
SHEINKOPF: How he got the weapon is the question. Does he have other weapons stored? Are there people associated to him that have the weapons? Is he part of a larger group? Those are questions law enforcement has to answer.
. . .
DOBBS: What I'm talking about, we've seen a dramatic reduction in the number of hate crimes over the past eight year, seven to eight years. And, I mean, very significant, yet, within this short period of time, a compression of incidents. Your thoughts, Hank?
SHEINKOPF: By the way, depression time, economic crimes, times like these, we're not in depression, find hate crimes. Much easier to find. Find the other, target and hit it. That's what this is about.
Sheinkopf is projecting. He agrees with the SPLC-informed DHS report: Whites who resent the anti-White/pro-jew regime and its non-White privileges are considered enemies of the state, the Other, and should be hit. That's what he's about.
We're about to see a dramatic increase in the number of "hate crimes", because the regime just dramatically expanded the definition of "hate".
Brian Levin, J.D.: In Their Own Words: Hate Crime Act Supporters Speak (Video):
It was a truly beautiful day. A civilized society simply can not tolerate homophobia, anti-Semitism, misogyny, Islamophobia, racism, xenaphobia and other forms of invidious prejudice.
I'm reminded of King Canute's attempt to stop the tide. Unlike our situation, Canute's delusion was ultimately harmless.
If anything is invidious it's the actions of these self-righteous, self-interested, control freaks, hell-bent on not hearing any critique of their attempts to drive civilization off a cliff.
Is this the first "hate crimes" legislation?
Great Sedition Trial of 1944
http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Great_Sedition_Trial_of_1944
-----
"Under pressure from Jewish organizations, to judge from articles appearing in publications put out by Jews for Jews, the new indictment even more than the first was drawn to include criticisms of Jews as "sedition." It appeared that a main purpose of the whole procedure, along with outlawing unfavorable comments on the administration, was to set a legal precedent of judicial interpretations and severe penalties which would serve to exempt Jews in America from all public mention except praise, in contrast to the traditional American viewpoint which holds that all who take part in public affairs must be ready to accept full free public discussion, either pro or con."
------
And now it is to be extended to their allies. Isn't it clear to any White who studies this in an objective manner that the intent is to continue applying gradual force until anything resembling constitutional government, are crushed into submission?
If there is any question in their mind, then the following message should be considered. This is from:
http://www.rebelnews.org/opinion/hate/94727-adl-campaigns-to-train-hate-prosecutors
-----
"But in its exultant press announcement yesterday, ADL reveals the real reason it has never given up its struggle to make its hate bill the law of the land: ADL wants an army of “anti-hate” prosecutors who can go after those ADL considers guilty of bias-motivated crimes. After giving itself credit as chief architect of hate crimes laws on the state and federal level, ADL says:
The end of the legislative path for the hate crimes bill also marks the beginning of the next campaign – training prosecutors and law enforcement officials about the new law. ADL stands ready to help lead that continuing effort.
ADL is clearly beginning a second phase – to train lawyers and law enforcement nationwide on prosecuting hate criminals. In ADL-speak, “haters” are those who oppose homosexuality, allege Jews dominate media, government, finance, or are guilty of “strong” criticism of Israel or its leaders.
ADL is already the primary source for hate crimes education for the US Justice Department, FBI and all local law enforcement. In 1990, through passage of its Hate Crimes Statistics Act, ADL granted itself such empowerment. But ADL wants much more.
Entirely staffed by Jews, ADL is headed by a devoutly religious Orthodox Jew, Abe Foxman (See, ADL’s Foxman: Man of Faith?). Like its sister Jewish attack group, the Southern Poverty Law Center, ADL has a focused religious objective: to revive ancient Jewish persecution of Christians, begun 2,000 years ago and recorded in the New Testament. The true intent of ADL’s federal and 45 state hate laws is to empower the legal, systematic, and ruthless persecution of Talmudic Judaism’s greatest rival, Christianity. To this end, ADL now calls for a national “campaign” to train an army of federal and local hate crimes prosecutors."
------
The article continues at the link.
Flanders
"SHEINKOPF: How he got the weapon is the question."
Uh... I think we know how he got his weapon. That's not the question. The question remains how was he an officer in the US military:
"In other discussions, Hasan said he believed that "The Koran trumped the U.S. Constitution and that his true allegiance was to Koran..."
versus:
The wordings of the current oath of enlistment and oath for commissioned officers are as follows:
"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God." (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).
"I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God." (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)
Military + Multiculturalism = Ft Hood
Sounds like Political Correctness + Multiculturalism + Diversity = White Extinction.
Post a Comment
<< Home