Blog has moved, searching new blog...

Friday, July 01, 2011

The Anti-White Regime in Action in Wisconsin

Feds sue New Berlin for racism, Beloit Daily News, 24 June 2011:
MILWAUKEE (AP) — The U.S. government has filed a lawsuit alleging New Berlin city officials caved to pressure from their largely white community by deciding not to build low-income housing that could attract more black families.
The government is deliberately attempting to inflict conditions that will bring about the physical destruction of a White community in Wisconsin.

The very first reader comment on the story offers forthright support for that community:
Kevin wrote on Jun 25, 2011 9:27 AM:

" Its Their lives, their town, their 'pursuit of happiness'. The government has not right to tell these people who they should think, how they should live. I hope they stand up and resist this invasion. "
The very next reader comment is a weasel-worded anti-White response:
Red Rock wrote on Jun 27, 2011 1:24 AM:

" That's right Kevin! You go! For example, if the town has designs on only blue-eyed and blond haired residents that are Protestants, then that is their riight! Oh, wait. Wasn't that tried in the 1940's in Germany? Nevermind. On second thought Kevin, you're all wrong on this one. "
Red Rock thinks it's OK to destroy a White community in Wisconsin today because, when you get down to what's really important, they remind him how much he hates blond-haired blue-eyed people no matter when or where they are.

For more details and another anti-White view see Racism's Ugly Face in Wisconsin, Courthouse News Service, by Lisa Buchmeier, 23 June 2011:
MILWAUKEE (CN) - Housing developers say the mayor of New Berlin buckled to racist pressure and shut down an affordable housing project. To "save his political career," the builders say, the mayor, who is not racist himself, truckled to community fears that affordable housing would draw minorities to the city, which is 93.3 percent white.
At one meeting, a member of the public commented, "If being against low-income housing makes me a racist and a bigot, then I guess I am a racist and a bigot," according to the complaint.

The developers say the bigotry stems from "the perceived lower socio-economic status of many minority group members and because of the demographic disparity between Waukesha County ... and neighboring Milwaukee County."
Four days later Buchmeier followed up with Feds Take on Racism in Wisconsin:
After changing his vote, Chiovatero wrote an open letter to all residents: "In 2010, when the Section 42 Workforce housing came to public attention, it was clear that the nearby residents did not want this project to go forward. In support of the residents, I have since researched a means to halt the project. I am committed to focusing on what suitable options are available. The City Staff and I have found justification for discontinuing the project and will now be focusing on alternatives."

But the plaintiff United States of America says that New Berlin's "application of its zoning and land use laws have the intent and effect of discriminating against prospective black tenants and residents of New Berlin."
The clear intent and effect of the government subsidizing and ultimately imposing the construction of "affordable housing" - a dishonest code-word everyone knows means disproportionately non-White housing - in a majority White community is to inflict conditions that will bring about the physical destruction of that community, in whole or in part. This destruction is being imposed over the explicit, earnest objections of community members who have expressed legitimate, reasonable fears. The government is aided and abetted by media reports blithely pathologizing and demonizing those who oppose this destruction.

Here's another report. U.S. accuses New Berlin of racial bias in housing decision, Journal Sentinel, 23 June 2011:
From the start, some objectors expressed concern that prospective tenants would be African-Americans or other minorities and used racially derogatory terms to refer to them, or implied racial bias as the reason for objecting to the development, according to the complaint.

The complaint cites correspondence that mentioned "white flight," crime, drugs, slums, gangs, families with 10 or 15 kids, needing "to get a gun," not wanting New Berlin to turn into Milwaukee, moving to New Berlin "to get away from the poor people," not wanting to provide housing to people "who work but do not live here." Some writers also used racially derogatory terms for African-Americans.
New Berlin, a city of about 39,000, is 95% white, according to the lawsuit.
Finally, here's an article that sheds some light on the government's history of imposing non-White housing in White neighborhoods in the Milwaukee area. South Milwaukee, developer settle apartment bias issue, Journal Sentinel, 27 June 2011:
In 1992, developers bought land at what is now 3344 Marina Road with the intent of building the apartments, some of which would serve lower income and disabled residents.

The following year, after citizen opposition mounted, the city imposed a moratorium on building permits for Lake Bluff and then rezoned the land from multifamily to single-family housing.

In 1994, a Milwaukee County circuit judge ordered the city to issue building permits for Lake Bluff. By 1995, construction was complete and residents had moved in.

But in November 1995, the state Supreme Court ruled in the city's favor, saying the judge's order on the building permits should not have been issued.

Nearly five years later, in June 2000, the city won another court ruling, ordering the developer to tear down the two Lake Bluff buildings.
Earlier in the same article we find the sad precendent and likely outcome for New Berlin:
The long-running South Milwaukee dispute once saw the city attempting to raze the Lake Bluff Apartments complex, which includes affordable housing. About one-third of the complex's residents have been minorities. The city's population was 1% black by the 2000 census.

In July 2009, a federal jury found that razing the property would have a disproportionate effect on minority and disabled residents and would be in violation of the federal Fair Housing Act.

South Milwaukee officials had said they sought to raze the buildings because it violated the city's zoning, and not with the purpose of discriminating. The parties have been negotiating for more than a year, with U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman mediating.

Provisions of the settlement, according to lawyers, include:

The two buildings of Lake Bluff, at 3344 Marina Road, will not be torn down, and the complex will continue its mix of 25 affordable-housing units and 31 market-rate units until 2025.
In the predominant narrative of the anti-White regime non-Whites are presented as innocent victims who are just looking for a better life for themselves. Whites who could just as easily be seen in such a positive light are instead regularly depicted as greedy, selfish, ignorant and evil. De facto segregation is presented as a problem, with compulsory government-imposed integration as the solution. The anti-White nature of the regime is confirmed by the casual sinister, cynical regard aimed specifically at Whites and which is dominant among the perpetrators and apologists in positions of power and authority in government, law and media.

Keep this in mind the next time you hear someone who hates Whites moralizing about White "bigotry" and "racism": no matter how many people oppose it, segregation isn't genocide, and no matter how many people support it, compulsory integration is.

(The image is taken from New Berlin City Council meets for first since federal gov. filed lawsuit, Gamut News, 29 June 2011. Embedded on that page is a video of local Fox News affliate coverage.)

Labels: , , ,



Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's right Kevin! You go! For example, if the town has designs on only blue-eyed and blond haired residents that are Protestants, then that is their riight! Oh, wait. Wasn't that tried in the 1940's in Germany?

Which of course explains why Hitler was expelled from Nazi Germany for being black haired, and the 33% of Germans who were Catholic at the time were all expelled from Germany as well.

Seriously, where is this clown getting his history from?

7/01/2011 02:12:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Even Libertarians should be dead set against this suit the U.S. government has filed against New Berlin city officials.

The U.S. Government is seeking to stage manage the movement of people in Minnesota, as opposed to allowing the free market and personal choice to control who lives where.

If anyone's like the Nazis, it's the U.S. Government which tries to centrally control every aspect of people's lives, violating the sovereignty of individuals and local communities alike.

What’s next?

Will our children have be forced to join the “Diversity Youth”?

7/01/2011 02:38:00 PM  
Anonymous Daybreaker said...

Sorry, off-topic, I'll try not to make a habit of it, but while they're trying to smash a community in Wisconsin, they're also trying to smash Australia. I'm copying and pasting the whole thing to have a lasting record to refer to, because this is so blatantly evil that the Jerusalem Post may change later it to cover it up:

From the Jerusalem Post

Danny Danon: Send African migrants to Australia
06/30/2011 16:35

Likud MK and Australian MP discuss "humane solution" for thousands of 'Muslim infiltrators' in Israel: Send them to live down under.

MK Danny Danon (Likud) asked Australian MP Michael Danby on Wednesday to propose, in parliament in Canberra, sending African migrants from Israel to Australia.

Danon and Danby discussed the issue during the Australian politician’s visit to Israel for the World Jewish Congress’s International Conference of Jewish Parliamentarians.

“The arrival of thousands of Muslim infiltrators to Israeli territory is a clear threat to the state’s Jewish identity,” Danon told The Jerusalem Post.

“The refugees’ place is not among us, and the initiative to transfer them to Australia is the right and just solution.

“On the one hand, it treats the refugees and migrants in a humane way. On the other hand, it does not threaten Israel’s future and our goal to maintain a clear and solid Jewish majority,” he explained.

Danon said Danby enthusiastically agreed to present the idea to the Australian Parliament.

Danby was not available for comment, however, as he was in-flight on his way back to Australia.

According to the Knesset’s Research and Information Center, there were 35,638 migrants in Israel as of May.

Fewer than 1 percent are recognized by the UN as refugees.

Some 61% of the migrants – 21,748 people – are Eritrean, however, and categorized as members of a “temporary humanitarian protection group” by the UN, because they cannot be returned safely to their home country due to internal strife.

“Since Australia has a policy of accepting refugees and groups under protection, I would appreciate it if you could promote a solution in which Australia would accept those who seeking refuge,” Danon wrote in a letter to the MP from Melbourne following their meeting.


By the way, for those skeptical of my former opinion that Melbourne and Sydney Jewry represent significantly different models of Jewish / White Gentile co-existence, here's Michael Danby
Member of the Australian Parliament
for Melbourne Ports, Victoria. The facts are on your side.

7/02/2011 11:59:00 AM  
Anonymous Daybreaker said...

Back to New Berlin: "The developers say they tried to avoid litigation by offering to build fewer units, but say the mayor and the city attorney would agree only if the units were to be occupied by senior citizens or as market-rate apartments."

In other words, the sticking point was the importation of a government subsidized body of fighting age non Whites. Agreement might have been possible on the importation of a body of non-White seniors considered unlikely to attack anybody, but the New Berliners didn't want to accept a fighting force that would inevitably (and intentionally) wage a war of ethnic cleansing against them, as has happened in so many other places.

This is what Wandrin always point to. He's right. This is how ethnic cleansing and White displacement work. And this is very definitely the imposition of conditions that will bring about the physical destruction of that community, in whole or in part.

7/02/2011 12:23:00 PM  
Anonymous Daybreaker said...

The genocidal attackers know very well what they are doing in New Berlin. Nothing will do for them but the importation of fighting age ethnic cleaners. The people defending themselves, their families and their land and property in New Berlin also know what this is about, since that was the line they would not accept to be crossed.

But Lisa Buchmeier of the Courthouse News Service pretends not to know. She demonizes the defenders.

This too is part of the pattern of genocide.

7/02/2011 12:40:00 PM  
Anonymous Cameron said...

'By the way, for those skeptical of my former opinion that Melbourne and Sydney Jewry represent significantly different models of Jewish / White Gentile co-existence...'

Daybreaker can you expand on that or give me a link to where you have previously discussed it?


7/02/2011 09:37:00 PM  
Anonymous Daybreaker said...

Hi Cameron. Here.

I am very familiar with internal Jewish debates in which the "we can't be insular" line is code for "be more aggressive" and the "ghetto mentality" smear is used to delegitimize a more inward-looking, more "selfish" but more harmless and politically passive approach, one that accepts that it's dumb to rock the boat when it's your boat, and that those who hold all the cards shouldn't kick over the card table. The opposite approach isn't just generic self-deception and hypocrisy, it is a different strategy with a harsh edge.

Anyway, I thought I should admit that in this scandalous attack on Australia, the Australian connection is a Melbournian. So, I can't prove that what I called "the Melbourne model" (that is the less aggressive one) ever corresponded to the actual Jewish community of Melbourne (since what I said was based purely on personal contacts and communications I wouldn't go into), and if there was a milder Melbourne model, either it's not that way any more, or that's irrelevant, and the "front loading" of Jewish community life (where whoever is most aggressive versus non-Jewish alleged threats tends to set the direction for everyone) is what matters.

Anyway, enough with that. Let's refocus on the aggression against New Berlin, Wisconsin. This is really important.

7/02/2011 10:51:00 PM  
Anonymous ben tillman said...

Red Rock wrote ....

Red Rock? Rothstein?

7/02/2011 11:21:00 PM  
Anonymous ben tillman said...

The developers say the bigotry stems from "the perceived lower socio-economic status of many minority group members....

PERCEIVED????? It's low-income housing!!!!!

7/02/2011 11:25:00 PM  
Anonymous Rollory said...

OT (maybe there is a better previous thread for this but I'm not sure which):

With regard to GoV and the Geller/EDL mixup, I just want to note that, first, pointing out that a Jewish person trying to make the EDL focus on Jewish concerns makes that Jewish person look bad is now called "seeing Joos under the bed" and gets one's comment deleted, and second, the EDL thing is about as clear an example as possible of "we stand with Israel" meaning "at the expense of anybody else, even our own people".

7/03/2011 07:08:00 AM  
Anonymous Daybreaker said...

I've been looking for information on New Berlin, Wisconsin, and there's nothing by the residents making a case for themselves.

They probably don't have the skills, contacts and resources. This isn't Hollywood!

They probably think they'll be demonized for anything they say, and they're right about that.

Whoever speaks has to identify themselves for punishment. Modern America is not a free speech environment.

It's not because they don't feel strongly about this that they are silent.

7/03/2011 10:08:00 AM  
Anonymous Daybreaker said...

Mayor Jack Chiovatero and City Attorney Mark Blum were as hostile to the community as they dared to be. They really betrayed it. So the people's trust in their elected representatives was misplaced. That raises two questions.

Who organizes and leads the besieged community now? How can people find each other and organize democratically, when articulating their concerns is illegal or as good as illegal?

And what criteria could or should they have employed to see that they had elected representatives who would not sell them out like this in the first place?

7/03/2011 10:23:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If somebody could get Whitaker's Mantra and mantra thoughts into New Berlin's local paper it could start something. There is nothing "racist" or illegal in it, but it sure exposes the illegality of anti-white racists

7/03/2011 12:17:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Are not there any very elderly people living in that town that could just sacrifice themselves and assassinate the town leadership and the real estate developers involved. They need to learn that they will pay with their lives every time they entertain a thought of destroying another white neighborhood. White people have become such pussies. If you are 85 years old you can go down in glory and help your race at least. You don't have to publish this, but there is just no other way.

7/03/2011 06:42:00 PM  
Anonymous Daybreaker said...

Yes, dreams of assassination are no good. Let that kind of thinking go out of your head, never to return.

We Whites are basically law-abiding people. There is weakness in that, but a greater strength in the long run. Anyway, it is what we are and it won't change.

Any movement that wants to command the respect of Whites needs to steer clear of Jewish style terror tactics.

Acts like the King David Hotel bombing built Israel, but they are not the way to build a White state.

7/03/2011 09:37:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

“…all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.” – Declaration of Independence

7/04/2011 06:56:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Okay, okay, I’ll ‘fess up – I’m a "White apologist."

Only, I’m not the kind you are likely thinking of – I’m not the kind of White man who feels compelled to apologize, out of feelings of self-hatred and "White guilt;" for such things as historical slavery, the "holocaust," not giving negroes more freebies and special advantages and easier access to our White daughters when they demand those things, not getting out of the way fast enough when mestizo invaders push for more and more territory in their drive for their "reconquista" of the American southwest, or just for being White.

I’ll tell you what kind of White apologist I am:"

I hope yours has been a good one, Tan, and that all your commenter's pre-Independence holiday has been a good one.


7/04/2011 07:01:00 PM  
Blogger FlippityFloppity said...

In March, the Metropolitan Milwaukee Fair Housing Council filed a federal discrimination complaint against Waukesha County, contending it has been engaged in illegal housing discrimination in violation of rules for receiving some federal money.

Lesson to be learned...

When the "community" cries out for affordable housing start the public comment, outrage and fight BEFORE they hire the developer who has expertise in securing tax credits linked to federal programs.

once you accept their money, you are screwed and bound by their laws (and interpretation thereof).

Yet another example of tanstaafl.

7/05/2011 09:18:00 PM  
Blogger FlippityFloppity said...

daybreaker - with sympathy towards the plight of Australia under the thumb of their refugee-loving jewish elites... Im happy its just fewer refugees coming to America.

we will never convince our altruistic, religious-left from stopping the process. So, its entirely in the hands of elected officials and there lies the focus.

7/05/2011 09:52:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tan, This isn't intended as a published comment, but here is an update link to a site where Green Arrow posts:

There is some awakening going on.


7/07/2011 08:21:00 PM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

Thanks Flanders. I'm overdue for a link update. Thanks also for the holiday wishes. I hope you and yours had a good weekend.

7/07/2011 09:53:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Flanders - thanks for the link. Ive added that link to


7/13/2011 06:45:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

And thanyou blogger for wrecking that link. What the hell happened?

7/13/2011 06:46:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Red Rock's" commentary is a clear demonstration of someone who is RETARDED!

7/14/2011 06:23:00 AM  
Blogger Old Atlantic Lighthouse said...

Calling us racist or anti-Semite is a verbal taser attack. It is meant to disable us and to subject those who see it or hear it to fear. It is not about truth, except the truth of their power and willingness to use it w/o mercy to make us submit.

This blog has done a great job saying no to this message of intimidation.

7/17/2011 04:13:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home