Blog has moved, searching new blog...

Monday, June 20, 2011

Michele Bachmann Serves the Interests of Everybody Except Whites

Bachmann: America ‘cursed’ by God ‘if we reject Israel’ | Minnesota Independent: News. Politics. Media., 8 February 2010:
I am convinced in my heart and in my mind that if the United States fails to stand with Israel, that is the end of the United States . . . [W]e have to show that we are inextricably entwined, that as a nation we have been blessed because of our relationship with Israel, and if we reject Israel, then there is a curse that comes into play. And my husband and I are both Christians, and we believe very strongly the verse from Genesis [Genesis 12:3], we believe very strongly that nations also receive blessings as they bless Israel. It is a strong and beautiful principle.
Bachmann: Obama ‘Has Failed the African American Community’ and Hispanic Community | CNSnews.com, 20 June 2011:
“Mr. President, the status quo is not working for Americans,” said Bachmann. “The status quo certainly isn't working for the African-American community, with 16 percent unemployment, or the Hispanic community, with nearly 12 percent unemployment. It's even worse for the youth: For Hispanic youth right now, 26 percent unemployment; for African-American youth, 40 percent unemployment.

“This president has failed the Hispanic community,” said Bachmann. “He has failed the African-American community. He has failed us all when it comes to jobs.

“As president of the United States, my goal will be job creation in the Hispanic community, job creation in the African-American community, job creation for all Americans, and turning this economy around,” said Bachmann. “And we will.”
Nothing to see here says our special jewish fifth columnist "friend" Lawrence Auster, Is Bachmann making a special appeal to minorities?:
As can be seen from the full context of the statement, Bachmann was not making any particular appeal to blacks and Hispanics.
Says the guy who lives on planet Israel. Here's pro-Israel, pro-non-White Bachmann, in full context, in her own words: Michele Bachmann Explains President Obama's Jobless Report Quote.

Bachmann supports everybody except the people who actually make up the Tea Party.

Image care of Russian jews who hate Bachmann more than Whites ever could.

Labels: , ,

white

33 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Michele Bachmann recites the pledge of allegiance to Israel. She knows it by heart. Bachmann and her family members take all-expense-paid trips to Israel where they receive lavish accommodations. Apparently, in the past she has taken several trips to Israel to "work" in a kibbutz. How many times has she been to Israel? Why doesn't she move there and run for the kinesset?


A while back I read an article (I think on the occidental observer) about the pro-zionist Dutch politician, Geert Wilders. It seems that he too frequently visits Israel and spent time as a youth "working" in a kibbutz.

Is this an odd coincidence or typical of western politicians?

Kibbutzes are leadership training camps for future western politicians. They may be anti-muslim and anti-socialism but they're always strongly pro-Israel.

6/21/2011 03:12:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here we have the self styled queen of the "we're not about race" Tea Party lamenting the condition of blacks and mestizos under Obama. As with all numb skull conservative politicians white people are viewed as non-persons in America until they need campaign donations.

As predicted by many white nationalists, the Tea Party leadership has been co-opted and compromised by philo-semites and anti-racists. This happened sooner than I thought possible.

6/22/2011 06:13:00 PM  
Anonymous Scott said...

As predicted by many white nationalists, the Tea Party leadership has been co-opted and compromised by philo-semites and anti-racists. This happened sooner than I thought possible.

Yes, when the tea parties become "Support our troops in Iran" parties, then the trajectory you speak of will have reached its nadir. At that point someone should write a good case study on why you can't ignore the JQ and expect anything positive to come out of any conservative/reactionary movement. Even leaving aside the effect of actual jewish leaders (e.g. peter schiff at a tea party when asked about illegal immigration repeatedly downplayed it), a lot of the self-imposed anti-racist posturing starts as an innocent way to disarm the jewish media (who of course couldn't care less when jon stewarts rally is all white), but then snowballs into outright multicultrual liberalism.

6/22/2011 06:54:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

As predicted by many white nationalists, the Tea Party leadership has been co-opted and compromised by philo-semites and anti-racists.

No. The Tea Party was an anti-White movement from the get-go. It was WNs who mistakenly thought they could "infiltrate" it.

6/24/2011 03:59:00 AM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

"No. The Tea Party was an anti-White movement from the get-go. It was WNs who mistakenly thought they could "infiltrate" it."

As incoherent and decentralized as it is, the Tea Party represents the political expression of millions of Whites who are growing increasingly disenchanted with their displacement and dispossession. Deprived of "respectable" explicitly pro-White leadership for decades it is telling that the rank and file are still specifically attracted to the ideas and imagery of historic implicitly White nationalism.

The leaders from the established political class who have been elevated by the media, like Bachmann, reflect the interests of the anti-White/pro-jew regime. They do not represent the interests of the deracinated White masses they seek to mislead.

6/24/2011 10:01:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"No. The Tea Party was an anti-White movement from the get-go. It was WNs who mistakenly thought they could "infiltrate" it."

Not exactly. WN's were divided about the tea party phenomena and if it was ripe for infiltration by anyone then it was by the anti-racist, Israel worshipping, country club Republicans. That's exactly what happened. The milquetoast race realists and Amren types with their nifty pie charts never stood a chance.

And the tea party was never anti-white. The tea partiers just foolishly pretended, like the majority of white people, that the country's growing problems were unrelated to the demographic implosion of whites and the rise of Jewish and non-white minority political power.

6/24/2011 05:57:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The leaders from the established political class who have been elevated by the media, like Bachmann, reflect the interests of the anti-White/pro-jew regime. They do not represent the interests of the deracinated White masses they seek to mislead.

The fact is that Tea Party conservatives can't get enough of people like Bachmann, or Sarah "the only flag in my office is an Israeli flag" Palin. Jews aren't exactly ramming this stuff down their throats. The vast majority of White conservatives care more about Jews than they do about their own people. Look at how they are lining up to shell out $5000 each to attend Glenn Beck's "Restoring Courage" rally in Jerusalem in August.

There is nothing pro-White about the Tea Party movement, and much that is anti-White about it. It's not an embellishment at all to call it an anti-White movement.

6/24/2011 10:08:00 PM  
Anonymous Svigor said...

Knesset, not kinesset, though it does make for an interesting pun. Least, I think I've got the spelling right.

Anyway, I have a neologism for the gallery: Yid kopf. As in, "what am I, a yid kopf?" It's our analog for "goyishe kopf." It means, "what am I, supposed to think like a Jew now?"

Another of the useful things we can steal from Jews; they've been calling us goyishe kopfs for so long, they don't have much of a defense. And the term is very useful shorthand, because of the legalisms and BS Jews get up to (e.g., Mangan's Jewish gallery), and especially, all the Judeo-centric thinking and perspectives they pack into their communications.

6/25/2011 08:24:00 PM  
Anonymous Daybreaker said...

White guilt for the Holocaust is universal. The Amish are guilty too.

Maybe going to Israel and begging forgiveness there lessens God's curse on the Amish for their ancestors' Holocaust guilt?

6/30/2011 03:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Mary said...

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2011/06/open-letter-to-pamela-geller.html#more




Off topic, but still quite amusing and interesting to watch the havoc and chaos jewish influence and presence within (supposedly) pro-White/pro Western groups is causing.

Personal note: I had my 'wake up moment' regarding Pamela Geller a while back. It actually hurt a bit, as I had admired her passionate work on certain subjects (victims of honor killings for one) for some time.

However, she did something after the Arizona shootings that I will never forget: she intentionally and purposely posted an attack on Jared Taylor , assisting the sick creeps in the media who were trying to nail him for somehow being involved in helping create that lunatic that did the shootings.
I wrote to Pam as soon as I saw her shameful posting about Jared and American Renaissance and I demanded she take it down as we both knew it was pure BS.
She refused.
Her reason? 'he is known to hang out with Nazis'.
I was furious and couldn't understand how she could knowingly cause such harm to a man she knew was innocent, as she herself has been the victim of smear attacks by leftists in the past.

Of course now I get it.
Oh man, do I get it.

Sadly for 'Tommy Robinson' and the EDL, they are going nowhere fast grovelling to the whims and moods of the jews and 'allies' like Pamela Geller.

What a farce.

6/30/2011 05:46:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tanstaafl, no post about the latest hilarious and predictible developments in the Counterjihad? Funny how the fate has proved you were right just a week after the "proposition nation" :)

7/01/2011 10:52:00 AM  
Anonymous Daybreaker said...

English Defence League chief Tommy Robinson supports the same line as Michele Bachmann:

"The English Defence League was formed two years ago. One of the fundamental beliefs that this movement was built on was its support for Israel’s right to defend itself. In our first demonstrations, we went to Birmingham, and we flew the flag of Israel, the Star of David. In the first public speech I ever gave, I wore the Star of David in Leeds. The reason for this is because Israel is a shining star of democracy. If Israel falls, we all fall. This is what our movement has been built on for two years."

7/01/2011 12:05:00 PM  
Anonymous Matra said...

Over at Jihad Watch Robert Spenser (I assume he is of Jewish ethnicity) has gone after Baron and the GoV website:

Ned May, who is “Baron Bodissey” of Gates of Vienna, is the Machiavellian plotter behind this attack on me – and he himself described himself as such in the EDL forums. He has posted scurrilous attacks on me and Robert Spencer well before this. Perhaps because he has accomplished little, he seeks to attain some sort of notoriety by destroying elements of the counterjihad movement that are more effective than he is.

At the same time, and probably not coincidentally, Gates of Vienna has become a home for many anti-Semitic rants that are deeply disturbing; not only are these sanctioned by the proprietors, but they’ve added to the chorus


So there you have it. It's not enough to agree with the gatekeepers 95% of the time. It must be 100% fealty or you will be look on with suspicion.

7/01/2011 12:41:00 PM  
Anonymous Matra said...

Correction. The quotation is from Pamela Geller not Spencer, though the latter appears to be the one who posted her remarks.

7/01/2011 12:45:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's funny as hell considering how much Baron and GoV struggled and tried to avoid being identified with the "neo-Nazis" and "anti-Semites", and now they're being accused of exactly those things by their beloved Jewish friends and allies in the Counterjihad. Glorious! Comic gem.

7/01/2011 12:57:00 PM  
Blogger Chechar said...

*Ned May* is the real name of “Baron Bodissey”? Who exposed the man? Jewess Pam Geller? Jesus.

If so it means that even though the Baron and his wife went to incredible pains to distance themselves from us, a Jewess now treats them this way (take heed of Mary’s comment about what Geller did to philo-Semite Jared Taylor above). But I doubt counter-jihadists will wake up. Dymphna made it all too clear after the blog wars that whatever happens she will remain loyal to Israel.

If I were welcomed to comment at GoV I would’ve replied with my latest entry on why every decent American should become an anti-Semite. But these philo-Semites will never learn, the poor guys are beyond repair.

As unlikely as it may seem, I feel sorry for Ned May.

7/01/2011 02:07:00 PM  
Blogger Chechar said...

Mary, have you been following GoV? I’ve not visited the site since the previous incident…

7/01/2011 02:09:00 PM  
Anonymous Daybreaker said...

Matra: "Over at Jihad Watch Robert Spenser (I assume he is of Jewish ethnicity)..."

He has said he isn't. I believe him.

7/01/2011 03:49:00 PM  
Anonymous Mary said...

Hi Chechar,

No, I haven't been following GOV too closely, but I still often check in on Auster's blog to see his headlines, and it was there I discovered the Geller/SPencer attack on the EDL over (of course!) "anti-semitism" ---*yawn*.

That was all I knew until I got in a few minutes ago and found out about the latest soap opera developments. I am disgusted that Pamela printed the Baron's full name without his consent, but, as I already pointed out, I am no longer surprised by what she is capable of, as it seemed clear to me she would have loved to have seen Jared Taylor arrested for ANYTHING, true or not, her hate for him runs that deep.

And yes, the sad, sad state the 'Baron' now finds himself in , being called 'Anti semetic', (BIG LOL), by his fellow 'counter-jihadist' Pamela Geller is really such sweet justice given how you and Tan were treated.

Yet, like you, I actually feel quite sorry for them, especially knowing their financial situation and how this move by Geller/Spencer is likely to cost them a lot of money-- it is hard to feel too smug.

Still- I am no saint and I can't say I am not enjoying the show just a little bit, lol ;)

7/01/2011 03:55:00 PM  
Anonymous Matra said...

*Ned May* is the real name of “Baron Bodissey”? Who exposed the man? Jewess Pam Geller?

He's been 'out' for a while. He's been posting under his real name with a small photograph at Big Peace (owned by Andrew Breitbart) for a while now.

Daybreaker,

I'm going entirely by his physical appearance. I know very little about the man.

7/01/2011 03:56:00 PM  
Blogger Chechar said...

Thanks for the heads-up Mary.

@ Matra,

Spencer looks Semitic but he is not Jewish. His Christian family got away from a hostile Muslim country and immigrated to the US.

7/01/2011 04:02:00 PM  
Anonymous Matra said...

Here's his profile at Big Peace.

BTW Pamela Geller strikes me as little more than a narcissist.

7/01/2011 04:07:00 PM  
Anonymous Daybreaker said...

Baron Bodissey (follow Mary's link): "By the way — for those of you who think that what Pamela Geller did will have no effect on the future fortunes of the EDL, think again. She may be on the other side of the Atlantic, but her blog is very popular and widely-read, as are some of the other sites that picked up this story from her. Atlas Shrugs has ten times the readership that this blog has, and probably a hundred times as many American readers.

Some of those American readers are wealthy philanthropists — not just Jewish, but all different types — who trust what she says and may make decisions based on it. If the EDL is ever to move beyond the street-demo model into something larger, it will need well-heeled donors. Geert discovered that American benefactors were crucial to his cause, and the EDL may well come to the same conclusion.

So don’t overlook the possibility that Ms. Geller has the indirect ability to close (or open) significant doors for the EDL."

In other words, this is as I described it before: a typical pattern.

Jews are perceived as the indispensable ally in the common front: they have the biggest megaphone, the most belligerent attitudes, the most intensity, the greatest verbal fluency and the best connections. Above all, they have their hands on the money tap, and Whites have been reduced to a needy and dependent status.

So since Jews are indispensable they have the power of veto, the power to "out" and accuse, to purge and condemn.

The rest is inevitable.

The "anti-jihadist" common front, to the extent that it exists at all, must fly the star of David and be all about what's good for the Jews. What's good for the Whites is not allowed to be an issue at all.

What did the White activists get for all their worship? Not even a good name, as they are condemned by their hoped-for Jewish patron(s) and each other, with those quick to demonize other Whites for antisemitism being accused in turn.

This kind of alliance is bad for the Whites.

7/01/2011 04:25:00 PM  
Anonymous Mary said...

Ahhhh, I had no idea he had 'gone public' Matra, thanks. I retract my disgust @ his being 'outed' by Pamela then!

7/01/2011 04:31:00 PM  
Anonymous Daybreaker said...

What would the price of internal peace be for an imaginary Michele Bachmann administration?

The same as for the EDL. The pattern stays the same, whether it's applied to something as small as the Gates of Vienna or as awesome as the United States Government. Jews, being the indispensable allies, with their hands on the money taps, would have the power of veto, the right to purge and accuse, exclude and condemn. The overall goals of the organization would have to be good for the Jews and it would be forbidden (as racism) to consider what is good for the Whites. There would have to be a free hand for Zionists to pack organizations with their friends. There would have to be a free hand for even the most extreme, terrorist-inclined branches of the Zionist movement. The game of non-Jews trying to be more pro-Jewish than thou, and accusing each other of antisemitism for minor or imagined deviations, would have to go on. And no matter what Michele Bachmann did, the vast majority of Jewish organizations would continue to condemn and oppose her, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year, out of ethnic hostility and eagerness to find fault.

In other words: business as usual.

7/01/2011 05:10:00 PM  
Blogger Chechar said...

Daybreaker,

What you are saying is exactly right. Now that I am seeing Duke’s videos what strikes me the most is the blackout of both the American and the European media about Jewish misbehavior, even in wikileaks. The censorship we recently experienced at Gates of Vienna is a microcosm of the censorship at the MSM.

See for example this video. The Jewish Congress at Canada wants people to be prosecuted and imprisoned just for linking —yes: for linking!— to one of Duke’s videos.

When Ned “Baron” May made me know last year that the rest of my chapters wouldn’t appear at GoV for what I had written in my blog, not for the content of my chapters, he revealed himself in microscopic form what happens in the macro world.

I agree with Svigor that Takuan Seiyo is a lying, sneaky, conniving little fuck: living proof that you can't serve two masters. But what concerns me the most are these WASP Christians who actively serve the other master. However sneaky and despicable, I understand Auster and Taksei’s taqiya. But these gentiles make my blood boil: they are cultural and race traitors —and they unconsciously know it.

7/01/2011 05:54:00 PM  
Anonymous Daybreaker said...

Chechar, thanks.

I followed your link and watched the David Duke video, which is good. I guess that makes you a criminal by Zionist standards, but we are all there anyway.

Yes, the ability of Jews and particularly Zionists to silence the voice of history is impressive, in a bad way.

I can't really agree with you on what goes on in the heads of the Baron and the rest, because I don't understand it.

I used to be an ardent Zionist too, and I believed fully in the neocon / antijihadist cause. But I didn't go around denouncing people or making it my business to see that hate facts didn't come to light. It never seemed to me that the best way to silence any doubts I had would be to silence other people.

I think that's a mental turning point that would be hard to explain unless you made it and came back from it. And if you had been there and come back, which does not happen as far as I know, you probably wouldn't want to talk about it.

7/02/2011 12:33:00 AM  
Anonymous Scott said...

Geller is a grating bitch. If he wants to widely be known as Ned May, his name would be on his website. Very jewish behavior. Richard Hoste (whatever happened to him?) said it best last year:

"Yikes, the face, the voice, the screechiness. If there's ever a horror film made based on Kevin MacDonald's ideas, this woman will have to play a lead role."

About which the great defender of the White Majority, Larry Auster, wrote:

"Interesting. I thought that Kevin MacDonald's thesis was that Jews are a mortal threat to the white race, and therefore must be expelled from the West or exterminated, because they are driven by a competitive Darwinian evolutionary program to destroy white society wherever they encounter it. But what Hoste seems to be saying is that MacDonald thinks that Jews are a mortal danger to the white race, and therefore must be expelled or exterminated, because some Jews have hyper active, New York Jewish style personalities like Pamela Geller."

7/02/2011 06:26:00 AM  
Anonymous Scott said...

Re-reading my own comment, I noticed that Geller's dirty machiavellian style of attack on Mr. Ned May is shared by Auster in his statement re:MacDonald.

"I thought that Kevin MacDonald's thesis was that Jews are a mortal threat to the white race, and therefore must be expelled from the West or exterminated."

The fucker is slanderously calling MacDonald an instigator to murder. And he's doing it because if he left out the "exterminated" part, and just spoke of "expelled from the West" (and even that isn't MacDonald's position), well there's nothing ipso facto unreasonable or immoral there, and so he must avoid that debate at all costs.

7/02/2011 06:46:00 AM  
Anonymous Daybreaker said...

We've drifted off-topic. But just because it's bad to let error stand...

Scott: "About which the great defender of the White Majority, Larry Auster, wrote:

"Interesting. I thought that Kevin MacDonald's thesis was that Jews are a mortal threat to the white race, and therefore must be expelled from the West or exterminated, because they are driven by a competitive Darwinian evolutionary program to destroy white society wherever they encounter it.""

That last part is wrong too. Kevin MacDonald has written straightforwardly on the smaller numbers of Sephardic Jews in America before the Eastern European Ashkenazi influx. They never became radically aggressive toward the White majority around them, and in his opinion they never would have.

7/02/2011 09:52:00 AM  
Blogger Chechar said...

From the desk of Pamela Geller:

Quote:

So it seemed to me at the time that the EDL was a genuine anti-jihad group, strongly pro-Israel as every legitimate anti-jihad group must be, since Israel is at the front lines of the global jihad, and resolutely rejecting racism and any form of actual neofascism.

However, it has become increasingly clear that the EDL has morphed and diverged from its original course.

They now have clearly been infiltrated by the worst kind of influences, something that had successfully staved off for years, and they’re no longer staving it off…

And they are now unrecognizable to me… I was waiting to see if the forces of good would recapture the heart and soul of the group. Alas, it was not to be.

/end quote

With this definition of counter-jihad it is clear that they are my enemies.

Curiously, if anti-Semitic elements are indeed cropping out in the EDL this can only mean that they are a little more honest than Ned May, Fjordman, Con Swede and the other gentiles at GoV and Jihad Watch.

7/03/2011 07:23:00 PM  
Anonymous Daybreaker said...

Stacey McCain at The Other McCain uses Michele Bachman's beloved Genesis 12:3 quote in support of Pamela Gellar:

“And I will bless them that bless thee,
and curse him that curseth thee . . .”

"Disagreements about foreign policy are one thing. Jew-hating is something else. When someone says, “Zionists not welcome,” watch out.

Da Tech Guy informs us that some unpleasantness has developed among counter-jihad bloggers, requiring me to say: I’m with Pamela Geller."

Oh-Kay.

Clearly Genesis 12:3 has become the Bible proof-text of choice for Republicans and anti-antisemites.

7/04/2011 08:54:00 AM  
Blogger Chechar said...

At Mangan’s Rollory nailed it yesterday.

Quote:

@ "lol, you paleocons sure are paranoid about jews."

It's not so much Jews that I'm paranoid about, as non-Jews that are paranoid about anti-semitism.

If it was considered ok to criticize and look down on Jews the way some people criticize and look down on the French, this would simply not be an issue. Instead there is a deliberate unwillingness to be rational on the topic.

The Israeli politician in question here [a subject discussed at Mangan’s] is annoying, sure, even to the point of being a mortal enemy, but he's protecting his people. The real problem is the hypocrisy when we're told the rest of us can't do the same.

Related:

With regard to GoV and the Geller/EDL mixup, I just want to note that, first, pointing out that a Jewish person trying to make the EDL focus on Jewish concerns makes that Jewish person look bad is now called "seeing Joos under the bed" and gets one's comment deleted, and second, the EDL thing is about as clear an example as possible of "we stand with Israel" meaning "at the expense of anybody else, even our own people".

Their little "counterjihad" is in fact nothing of the sort and has never amounted to more than drawing-room polite society talk. A counterjihad, if there is to be one, will involve semi-organized mobs in the streets, quite a lot of violence, and a philosophical commitment to the idea of, the permissibility of, exclusionary identity. Once that foundation is laid, alliances between groups will mean something, because each one will have something clear to gain from it. Until that foundation is laid, there is always the nearly explicit possibility that whatever gets won _must_ be shared with those that had no part in it.

/end quote

7/04/2011 07:44:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home