Blog has moved, searching new blog...

Thursday, June 02, 2011

A Disagreement About Who is Firstest

The video above is part of a CNSNews article, DNC Chair: Republicans Believe Illegal Immigration 'Should be a Crime', 31 May 2011. It quotes Wasserman Schultz spouting the usual apologia in favor of genocidal levels of immigration into the US:
“We have 12 million undocumented immigrants in this country that are part of the backbone of our economy and this is not only a reality but a necessity," she said. "And that it would be harmful--the Republican solution that I’ve seen in the last three years is that we should just pack them all up and ship them back to their own countries and that in fact it should be a crime and we should arrested them all.”
12 million? The backbone of our economy? The Republican solution is arresting them all? Political views don't get much more detached from reality than this. And this is not some random US congresswoman. Wasserman Schultz leads one of the two major political parties.

The second half of the video starts with a question about a disagreement at a meeting which took place a few days earlier. Note that this question triggers a far more impassioned response:
Question: The Republican Jewish Coalition head was reported in the New York Times - Matt Brooks is saying that you were proposing a gag order on this subject.

Wasserman Schultz: Ha ha, yeah, well, uh, you know I take... one of the most tremendous sources of pride for me is that I am the first jewish woman to represent the state of Florida in Congress. And, ah, another tremendous source of pride for me is that I am a pro-Israel jewish member of Congress and I proudly support a president that is pro-Israel. Um. What I think is unfortunate and what I suggested, along with others, including members of the Republican Jewish Coalition that are not the executive director of that organization, um, is that we need to make sure, like AIPAC pushes for, like Jewish Federation pushes for, like ADL and every major jewish organization pushes for in this country, we need to make sure that Israel never becomes a partisan issue. And that's what we talked about in that meeting.
The meeting was a bipartisan jewish affair regarding jewish interests. Jewish GOP official blasts DWS, Politico, 24 May 2011:
The top official at a Republican Jewish group blasted Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz for an “unprecedented and inappropriate” effort to quell partisan debate over Israel in a private meeting with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu yesterday at which both were present.

Republican Jewish Coalition Executive Director Matt Brooks clashed with Wasserman Schultz, as I reported yesterday, after Wasserman Schultz called for partisan unity on matters of Israel policy and Brooks – whose group had criticized her for speaking before the liberal group J Street – responded that he reserved the right to attack Democrats who stray from a hawkish pro-Israel line.
Another take on the interview and the disagreement - DNC chair argues Obama isn't losing support of Jewish voters, Los Angeles Times, 26 May 2011:
The South Florida Democrat laughed at charges leveled by the head of a Republican Jewish group that she wanted to squelch partisan criticism over Israel. Matt Brooks, executive director of the Republican Jewish Coalition, accused Wasserman Schultz of proposing a “gag order” on criticism about Israeli policy when they and others met privately with Netanyahu this week.

“We need to make sure that Israel never becomes a partisan issue, and that’s what we talked about in that meeting,” Wasserman Schultz said. She quoted Netanyahu as saying, at the end of the meeting, that when it comes to Israel, “we need to erase the aisle” between Democrats and Republicans.
“Everyone that calls themselves legitimately pro-Israel believes that we should not make Israel a partisan issue. Unfortunately, I think there are organizations that claim to be pro-Israel that are partisan first and pro-Israel second. And I think unfortunately the way the Republican Jewish Coalition has conducted itself is they put their Republicanism in front of their pro-Israel stance. And I think that’s unfortunate. And I think it’s why the Israeli Embassy said that Israel should not be a partisan issue.”
Here are a couple of previous media reports concerning Wasserman Schultz's background.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz picked as Democratic National Committee chair, POLITICO, 5 Apr 2011:
The congresswoman is beloved by the Democratic rank and file for her aggressive, outspoken advocacy for liberal points of view. She’s frequently deployed as a surrogate, particularly to groups of women and Jewish voters.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz Picked to Chair D.N.C., NYTimes, 5 Apr 2011:
Ms. Wasserman Schultz is known inside the party for her strong fund-raising abilities, and she represents South Florida, which will be a critical battleground in the 2012 presidential race.
Some background on Matthew Brooks:
Matthew Brooks serves as Executive Director of both the Republican Jewish Coalition, an organization dedicated to enhancing ties between the Jewish community and the Republican Party, and the Jewish Policy Center, a think-tank that examines public policy from a Jewish perspective.

Matt began his political career as State Chairman of the Massachusetts College Republicans while still an undergraduate at Brandeis University in Waltham, MA. Matt managed the Jack Kemp for President campaign in Massachusetts, as well as directed projects in New Hampshire and New England. Matt became the Political Director of the Republican Jewish Coalition in 1988. Taking a leave of absence from the RJC, Matt served as the National Field Director for Victory ‘88 Jewish Campaign Committee, designing and implementing campaign strategy on behalf of the Bush-Quayle ‘88 campaign. Matt was appointed Executive Director of the RJC in 1990.

Matt was twice selected (in 2006 and 2008) by the Jewish Forward as one of the 50 most influential Jews in America.

In addition to his duties leading the RJC, Matt also serves as the organization’s principal spokesman. In this role Matt has been a frequent guest on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC and has been quoted extensively in publications such as the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal and other major newspapers.
One of the many consequences of jewish influence in media and academia is that the perfectly descriptive term Zionist Occupation Government is painted as "an antisemitic conspiracy theory". Yet, the jewish conspiracy is right out in the open. Erase the aisle. Israel first, party second. This is the state of US politics today.

What we see here is a disagreement between hyper-ethnocentric jews who hold positions of great power and have strong influence over the US government. What they care about most is what's best for the jewish ethnostate of Israel. They all agree that in US politics the interests of Israel should always come first, across the board, for everyone, not just jews. The big question for them is whether to continue imposing this the usual stealthy judeo-liberal way, or the usual in-your-face judeo-conservative way.

Labels: , , , , ,



Anonymous Jed said...

Does it make me a bad Christian that I want to punch that woman in the face? How does someone like that win a state-wide election?

6/02/2011 05:18:00 PM  
Anonymous Wandrin said...

Jews who support multi-culturalism, multi-racialism and unlimited mass immigration for America but not for Israel are self-evidently enemies of the United States.

6/02/2011 08:36:00 PM  
Anonymous Tom said...

Does it make me a bad Christian that I want to punch that woman in the face?

It looks like someone beat you to it ...

6/02/2011 09:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Brandon said...

You have to come to the realization that the country known as America is actually israel. That's why this country is breaking up and there will be established a regional republic for whites.

6/03/2011 07:34:00 AM  
Anonymous Sheila said...

As you and others have noted before, Tan, we have one party in this country with two wings - both go in the same direction but at different speeds. Both sides are represented by Jews, each insisting their team supports Jews the most, and so is most worthy of support. They call themselves Americans and their advocacy groups things like "People for the American Way," when their values are antithetical to White, Christian America. Just yesterday the mainstream website HotAir had this link, which I could not find on their list of headlines today, and so had to locate via a search engine:

6/03/2011 10:02:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

How about we use their terminology against them?

This woman is overtly not governing in a color-blind manner. She is seeking to create voting blocks based on race. As a result, she has dishonored the societal compact and her government can no longer demand the allegiance of those she is seeking to discriminate against.

Therefore, we should start formulating our efforts as directed to "white self-government" and "white economic self-determination". When she says that is racist, we simply state that she is not governing in a color-blind manner, and when/if she stops, we will cease advocating for economic self-rule and economic self-determination.

When we advocate for self-rule, that does NOT mean we seek to deny that to other groups of citizens. For example, black and jews can have their own enclaves within the US, but they will not be allowed to use the Federal government to effect wealth transfer.

6/03/2011 10:05:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The great thing about this argument is that out-groupers don't get to vote in it. We whites determine ourselves whether we want white self-rule and economic self-determination. If they deny us this opportunity it is a human rights violation!

Imagine all the double-talk they would have to engage in to respond to our arguments, e.g., "we are not denying you self rule, you can have self-rule for yourselves - you just can't have rule over us!" How does mr. wordsmithinski respond to that? Or, "We are not denying you the opportunity to be anything you like, you just have to pursue your dreams in your own ethnic enclave, not ours". As soon as they have to admit that they like our environment better - the cat is out of the bag and it becomes clear that the opportunities for parasitism is better among us than among other groups.

6/03/2011 10:28:00 AM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

From the link Sheila provided, Larry J. Sabato's Crystal Ball » Will Jewish Voters Abandon Obama in 2012?:

"the influence of religious conservatives and Tea Party supporters on the Republican Party remains a major obstacle to the GOP in attracting support from Jewish voters"

This is just another indication of jewish hostility toward Whites, but of course it is the jew-blind/jew-first White Tea Partiers who are blamed.

"According to data from the American National Election Studies, Jewish voters are only exceeded by African Americans in their attachment to the Democratic Party. Between 1992 and 2008, 82% of Jewish voters who were interviewed in ANES surveys identified with or leaned toward the Democratic Party. In contrast, among all other white voters during these years, only 43% identified with or leaned toward the Democratic Party."

. . .

"Over the past 40 years, Democratic identification has declined among traditionally Democratic groups such as white southerners and Catholics as more conservative members of these groups have shifted their loyalty to the Republican Party. Among Jews, however, there has been little evidence of such a shift because those with conservative views made up a small minority of all Jewish voters.

The continued liberalism of Jewish voters on domestic policy issues, and especially on social issues such as abortion, remains a major obstacle to Republican inroads. In fact, the rightward drift of the GOP in recent years has probably made any such shift of Jewish voters into the Republican camp even less likely.

More of the same. The political interests of jews and Whites are increasingly obviously at odds. It's only from a point of view sympathetic entirely to jews that the blame for this can be attributed to Whites.

6/03/2011 10:54:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Home rule for America!

6/03/2011 11:40:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh! If only there was Some Way of getting rid of parasitic infestations that was both effective and permanent!

Oh, well, back to reading "Mein Kampf"...

6/04/2011 12:40:00 PM  
Anonymous Mary said...

Sorry for the Off-topic post, but i couldn't help but notice the comments (regarding Sarah Palin and her wearing of the Star of David ) that appear on Gawker's website:

The clincher to me is that they are made by mostly Jews I think?
Here is one nice one:

Judaism is the kind of club that people like Sarah Palin don't get to join.


Listen lady, I know you must think that we little Jews are SOOOO adorable with our not-like-other-people-ness, but if you believe that a human being is a god, you don't get to wear the star.

It is just so funny hown much Jews hate Sarah Palin and other White conservative evangelicals, and yer they are the only hope these fools have!

6/07/2011 04:03:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It is just so funny hown much Jews hate Sarah Palin and other White conservative evangelicals, and yer they are the only hope these fools have!

If Jews were fools, they wouldn't be in the position they are today. They know what they are doing.

Conservatives are fundamentally feminine, submissive, and masochistic. Jews treat them the way they do because that is what conservatives respond to emotionally. If you want conservatives to like you, treat them like shit. That's how it works. White nationalists could learn a thing or two from Jews on this point.

6/07/2011 09:05:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Liberalism was the vehicle for jews to get their foot in the American door. Now it is only one aspect of the controlled opposition, though still a big one. "Conservativism" is currently another of the jews' hangouts. That is why conservatism is no longer considered mainstream by White or Christian (that doesn't include the satanist's known as judeo-"Christians") standards or by the standards of the de facto Americans. It has become just a portion of the various dialectical tools used to swing Americanism to Israeli (Rothschild) benefits and to swing "whites" to adapt to jewish controls domestically.

Whites can learn only by being White and recognizing that we are in a war, one declared against us many years ago.


6/07/2011 09:36:00 PM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

DNC Chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz Weighs In On Anthony Weiner Sex Scandal

Debbie Wasserman Schultz Refuses to Comment on Anthony Weiner Scandal!

"I think Anthony Weiner is dealing with a personal matter and that’s where it should be left."

6/07/2011 11:09:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home