Politics + Technology = Nonsense at the Speed of Light
AoTR and Hour By The Window up for personal archiving. You, sir, are a prince.Do you need money for this?pharbg
Thanks, but no donations are needed. The new policy: Donate.With no recording or commenting I'm running on a much smaller server. The cost is minimal, I'll pay the freight myself.
Tan, Thank you for putting the archive up.I know I'm still glad that the voice of reason was kept up. I still go on there and dl programs I missed. It is nice to know that the shows and info are always available even when the network is no longer functional.
Thanks for doing all this work, Tan, it is appreciated. - RM
Not gonna lie to ya. It hurt like Hell. I work at night and I always looked forward to your show on my last break on Wednesday mornings. I consider your series on Jews-as-a-race a minor classic. It cleared up their double-dealing and double-talk bullshit very nicely.I also loved Carolyn's willingness to say what she thinks. Sometimes I laughed my ass off she was so outrageous and so utterly spot on. Although the obvious down side to that is she likes to pick fights. She was even picking one with Andrew Anglin there at the end. And that Germany = White People thing she's got going on in her head needs to stop.Best thing I got out of Carolyn? She taught me how awesome it is to laugh at Jews. They really are pathetic.
Thanks for bringing the website back, Tanstaafl.
Can't you ask who (as you claim on the archived site) donated money for your show? Then those people could confirm it and you'd be able to document how much you're (allegedly) due? Seems to be just adding more crap to this whole sad scenario by now accusing Carolyn of stealing "your" money.Honestly, I feel really irritated with you. It's hard to grasp how you were just doing a friendly round-table show with her one week and then the next all this hidden hatred of Carolyn comes flying out. And it just happens to take place on the same week Glenn Miller's acts go national,(Carolyn being the one who invited him on TWN). It just stinks. I can't understand why you did it like this, despite your attempts to explain it. Not that it matters really, as it's clear it was a move meant to inflict maximum pain, and that it has certainly done. Regardless of how its ended,I do thank you for all your past work, I know how much you've done and I appreciate it.I'll never see you in the same light after this, but I wish you well and hope you keep at it as you do have a tremendous gift.Take care,
Mary,Get a grip. You're letting Carolyn's melodrama distort your view.accusing Carolyn of stealing "your" moneyHere are the facts:* I never received nor ever expected to receive any money for my work on tWn. I don't expect to receive any money now.* Carolyn managed all twn funds (donations and expenses).* tWn donations were solicited specifically to pay for tWn expenses.Based on what Carolyn had told me privately (these are not necessarily facts):* Some tWn donations came in specifically earmarked for/credited to particular hosts/programs.* Overall these tWn donations more than covered tWn expenses.Based on the above I have accused Carolyn of appropriating whatever tWn funds there were with the intention of using them for non-tWn purposes.I made a perfectly reasonable proposal that she use those funds to keep the read-only server running. She let her emotions cloud her judgement in disregarding that request.Carolyn is the only one who can make an accounting for those funds and how she intends to use them. She should do so.I feel really irritated with you . . . Glenn Miller . . . It just stinksIt irritates me that people like yourself, who supposedly liked me and my work, can't accept what I've said and instead make insinuations and accusations based purely on speculation. My decision to put tWn in read-only mode had nothing to do with Miller.Carolyn is the one who took tWn off the internet. I restored it. Deal with that.I can't understand why you did it like this . . . it's clear it was a move meant to inflict maximum painI agree, you don't understand, you're too busy emoting. The one thing I cannot be accused of is not trying to explain. Good grief I've tried. Some people get it. I can't help those who don't want to get it.
Speaking of the futility of trying to explain to some people...http://carolynyeager.net/comment/281#comment-281[where did I use the word attack?? -cy][Citation please]The very text she's criticizing contains the answers to her questions. (BTW, good truth-telling researchers provide links to what they're talking about, especially when they expect others to provide citations themselves.)["scolding" is a weighted word that does not describe my polite objection to his hostile comment on my program page]What a hostile, hypocritical scold. Ironically, it is one of her "polite objections" where she used the word "attack":[4/11/2014 6:56:45 PM] Carolyn Yeager: You know, Tan, I am not too happy about being grilled by you on my own program comments. It really seems you could speak to me privately before you go on the attack in public. … no answer …As I pointed out, Carolyn herself unwittingly put that skype chat in her melodrama-down.
Mary - I would submit that Tan could probably lay out for us in some detail the "pain" he went through dealing with Carolyn. You know, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that even if you like her work, that she is a very difficult person to deal with where as Tan is as easy going as it gets. This fact is very easy to see. He got fed up and ended it. I could hear the frustration in his voice on his final show. I do not need to know every fact during the past few years to "get it."I was reading Tan before TWN and will continue to do so. I actually hope he continues his shows as well. I understand that Carolyn thinks he should have just gone away and handed over all his hard work to her but that is not how the world works. When a partnership ends - it ends. What the person brought to the partnership goes with them as well. She is praising blogtalk now as just as good as anything Tan created so all should be good now. She can continue on doing her shows without a hiccup.
Well we know one of the players here is a mole. Only time will tell who it is. My bet is Tan.
Let the record show that Carolyn Yeager continues to try to utterly remove tWn from the internet.
uberab1Let the record show that ....And Tan continues to add his anti-Carolyn material to what he calls "the tWn archive" frozen on 4-15-14. No so, and it will continue to be not so. If Tan were an honest broker he would remove all his added content, and even his last blogpost "The End." Then it might represent a fair picture of tWn. He can post all his other stuff on this blog, as I do on mine.Since he is using this "archive" against me, I will make an issue out of his use of The White Network name, which always did and still does belong to me. It was even entirely my idea in the first place. Tanstaafl is a thief. He should stop being a thief, first of all.
LOL! The low-life who absconded with tWn's funds accuses me of being a thief. Get a life Carolyn.
I made changes several hours ago to redact the contents of pages authored by Carolyn Yeager and remove the MP3 files for programs she hosted.Will Carolyn Yeager continue to call me a thief while she tries to utterly remove tWn from the internet? I think so.
Carolyn, you are never in the wrong of course. You know-it-all 'truth seeker'. In you last bashing program you sounded all innocent and misrepresented what you tried to convey when you suggested that WN was or could be used by Jews. No one was buying it. Did you or did you not read an Anti's definition and history of White Nationalism? Did you or did you not very subtly insinuate that White Nationalism and Eurasianism are the same internationalism by reading that ridiculous essay by the knight's project or whatever they are called? Oh, WN is Internationalism, Marxist, egalitarian, and PC therefore it must be Jewish. Plz, spare me the nonsense. Here is a starting point for all: WN is primarily a call for White racial solidarity and unity for racial survival and self-determination for all White nations across the world. Is an idea such as German Nationalism, but it takes a strong will and national/racial awakening to make it a reality. Your criticism of WN are correct in some respects, Carolyn. But not your subtle insinuations and incorrect assessments. Oh, but who am I but a insignificant anon to disagree with Ms know-it-all herself. Therefore I must be in the wrong.
This is better.
My response to Carolyn Yeager.
Lol,it was sickening listening to CY in her last show playing the victim!This womans huge ego and lack of knowledge and specially lack of education makes her loose all credibility!There is no person out there that she didn't trash and stab in the back!Is everyone she attacked wrong or is she wrong?Its definatelly her that is wrong ,she lost her mind,she is a gossip tante!Thanks Tan and keep up a great work!
are you retired? no more audio or writing? What about the "parenting while racially aware" that a commenter brought up awhile back. I would like to see that as well.