Puttin da Muhfugging Bullit Throo da Muhfugging Boozeye
Youtube hosts a broad selection of gun-related videos. The titilating sub-genre sandwiched in the middle of the video above is probably among the more popular. In fact, the gun video genre as a whole represents just the tip of an enormously popular and vibrant American gun subculture. The Constitution-reading, law-abiding portion of this subculture is also overwhelmingly White. Even so, it's hard to find videos like this on YouTube. This video doesn't just titilate. It expresses a pro-White political position.
The black man is alarmed because he sees that, when the Schumer Hits The Fan, Whites will not only be well armed but better prepared. The contrasting sights and sounds - vulgar threat, bonny poise - stir deep, primal emotions. The women shooters don't have to say a word. Any White man with a properly functioning limbic system gets this message. As disgust and tingle pass, there is anger. White women shouldn't need to take up arms. Something is wrong in a society where they see such a need. Racial pride wells up, however, with the recognition that we do prepare well to face challenges, in whatever form they come.
Where we are weak is identity, which compounds our difficulty in properly identifying threats to us. Whites don't have a problem hitting the bullseye. Whites have a problem deciding which bullseye to hit. Ultimately, this is because Whites have a problem thinking clearly about who "we" is.
The 1960s-era Wally Butterworth voice-over at the end adds historic context. What has gone wrong started going wrong a long time ago. The Butterworth commentary is a reminder that for decades now the struggle for cultural and political power in the US, for it's identity, hasn't primarily been with blacks, but with jews. Neither he nor Rockwell tried to fool themselves or others into thinking that someday blacks would run America. Like George Lincoln Rockwell, Butterworth rightly made a point of calling upon Christian Whites to defend the country they had built. Today it is only more obvious that the assault is on White interests as a race, not constrained by borders or creed.
Labels: guns, media, prothink, video, wally butterworth
posted by Tanstaafl at 1/04/2013 10:38:00 AM
19 Comments:
What is the part of the video with the black guy from?
It looks like an Obama 2012 ad.
Where we are weak is identity, which compounds our difficulty in properly identifying threats to us. Whites don't have a problem hitting the bullseye. Whites have a problem deciding which bullseye to hit. Ultimately, this is because Whites have a problem thinking clearly about who "we" is.
These gun nut types aren't lacking in identity at all. Their identity as Christians is very strong. Accordingly they see jews as God's chosen people, and Nazis as their worst enemies. Just ask any of them and they'll tell you.
Most of the gun owners I know don't have a strong Christian identity. I would characterize the strongest and most common identity as individualist.
When I talk to White Christians I know, most see no point in a racial identity. That's what they lack. On one hand they're inundated with moralizing from "white" people who tell them religion is the only valid lens through which to see the world around them. On the other hand they hear "white" people who hate them because they're Christian. Both lead them to believe that a racial understanding is invalid.
P.S. Their limbic system tells them otherwise, which is why they pay such close attention to "white" voices to begin with.
Tan, you are speaking to and referring to those that practice Churchianity. This practice is as wicked as Judaism and these are the ones that believe that these people today that call themselves Jews are the chosen people of God.
This Christian, the one writing this post, and many others I know, us "non-church-going-ones, who take our faith from the scripture, are very racially aware and don't practice any mushy, wishwashy, universalism. We are of the old school....fire and brimstone.
"A muzzle for the oxen, a bridle for the mule, and stripes for the fool".
"I tell you that he who does not have a sword must sell his coat and buy one".
Just a couple of passages among thousands that reflect the discipline, clarity and strength to be found in the true Christian faith.
Just because you see 100 poor carpenters does not mean carpentry is to blame.
We live in a nation of fools and clowns....Thinking you may find some among them that will be agents for change just isn't wise or prudent.
Remember it has been Christian nations that have expelled the Jew for centuries, and to my knowledge, only Christian nations. This is not by chance. The nation you see now, the one you live in, and these "Christians" you speak with, are completely Jewed.
How do. I'm aware of Kinists, though I've not yet met one in the flesh.
Most of the people I know who identify in any sense as Christian don't see the world in terms of jews versus nazis any more than anyone else does. Which is, sad to say, quite a bit. What they actually know about such things is about the same as what they know about race. Which is, sad to say, not much.
Regarding these women that "feel the need" to take up arms.
There may be a few that authentically feel this, but it isn't the vast majority. The vast majority are deeply committed to Jewish feminism and have little to no feminine traits left in them. They do this because they like it, it gives them a sense of power and domination, which they have been brainwashed to believe is wholesome for females in the name of the "you-go-girrrlll" meme. They are the successful products of the Jewish cultural Marxist paradigm that teaches abhorrence of righteous male authority, male inferiority, and inculcates female superiority. I have witnessed that most of these females have had the men in their families encourage this behavior with all kinds of other masculine pursuits as well. They love football, ride motorcycles, want to be cops and firemen, etc, but meanwhile, they have lost all feminine grace and propriety. As such, they aren't worth a damn as mother and wives. This more than any other factor is responsible for the breakdown of the European family. These women revel in selfish pursuits of personal fulfillment their whole lives, instead of serving their families and communities with a sense of honor and duty. They are willing, gleeful competitors with men due to being unnaturally socially elevated through Jewish social engineering, just like the other "protected classes" have been. And just like the other classes, masses of these modern women are intoxicated with the false power and sense of dominance that it gives to them.
It is impossible to raise the youth in strength when the vast majority of their mothers are so spiritually weak. Selfishness is weakness. Service and self-denial is strength.
Of course, the men are just as much to blame on other fronts, but I am addressing the female behavior here in light of your post. Your post seems to suggest "man up"; look at what these poor women have been driven to by you useless men. We don't need anymore shaming of white European males, the Jew does that well enough on his own. Our men and boys have been under constant psychological attack for at least 50 years and had their women pitted against them and now masses of these women are taking the ball and running with it eagerly on their own.
If anyone wants to call the European man to “man up”, fair enough, but this is only half of the call to duty. What is missing from the equation is the call for the women to “woman down” while the men congruently “man up” Why should the European man “man up” alone? What is in it for him? Respect? Understanding and compassion from his wife, society and family? Loyalty from the same? Security that the fruits of his life's labor won't be stolen from him in a second by a totalitarian feminist system and traitorous kin? European Christian men “manned up” for centuries because it benefited them to do so. Where is the benefit now?
To finish my last comment.....
No righteous, moral, decent, competent man will compete with a woman. Rather, he will always defer in the name of compassion and decency. When women insist on crowding spaces that are the strengths of men, the good men give ground and become emasculated. Emasculated men are good for nothing. And once those spaces are dominated by women, the execution of their corresponding disciplines erodes very quickly. If you don't believe it, look around what has happened to our society for the past 50 years and the corresponding forced female interjection into every institution and sphere of life. Our government, military, schools, churches, sciences......everything is collapsing. The Jew knows this and this is why the feminist agenda is pushed on us. It is only men with a healthy sense of their masculine duty, a duty that then is respected and revered by their peers, that are capable of fighting for and defending their society. This is a major reason why the Jew must be parasitic, for Judaism is a matriarchal construct and therefore is extremely vulnerable to outside aggression. The parasitism that Jews practice is in part a defense against attack by a community that can not stand toe to toe with any patriarchal society. By Jews pushing their societal structure on white Christian nations we become just as weak and dysfunctional as they are; but we have no one to parasite on to to keep us alive like they do. This is why we are dying as a culture.
Often, I see cases of these “empowered” women to be even worse amongst so-called "conservative" families. I would imagine that the women in this video largely hail from “conservative” families. They think nothing to send their girls off to state run Marxist colleges that brainwash them from the get-go with militant feminism, enroll them in competitive team sports from infancy, and obligate them to female dominated churches that worship single mothers. This way of up bringing completely extinguishes natural feminine strengths and impels females to focus their development in areas where they are at a massive natural disadvantage to succeed in society at large, unless of course they are beneficiaries of AA, which of course they are, and massively so. Meanwhile, our males are constantly browbeaten and discouraged to excel from the earliest ages in areas that are naturally suited for masculine excellence, meanwhile never getting an extra hand or encouragement from any authority or institution. And inversely, they are then coerced into feminine realms such as “diversity secessions” and “pink ribbon for cancer days”, etc, ad nauseaum. If they voice any discomfort with this situation whatsoever, they are then diagnosed with non-existent diseases such as ADHD and forcefully drugged at a young age, turning them into sissified, useless, “things”. Over 70% of children on behavior modifying drugs are male.
This is the perverse reality that we live today.
Please don't add fuel to the fire, inadvertently or not. Personally, I'm not “manning up” for the benefit of any Jewed-up modern women, white or not, unless I see they understand and embrace their role in the process as I have outlined here. Manning up under the current structure is the definition of exploitation and foolishness for the European male in this country. If the women don't get it and still want to “play man”, they can rot for all I care. Tell them to marry a Jew.
Tan, you are speaking to and referring to those that practice Churchianity. This practice is as wicked as Judaism and these are the ones that believe that these people today that call themselves Jews are the chosen people of God.
That's practically all Christians.
This Christian, the one writing this post, and many others I know, us "non-church-going-ones, who take our faith from the scripture, are very racially aware and don't practice any mushy, wishwashy, universalism. We are of the old school....fire and brimstone.
There's nothing that supports racial awareness for Whites in the jew-book. It's racial awareness for jews, universalism for everyone else, just like every other jew-created ideology.
Remember it has been Christian nations that have expelled the Jew for centuries, and to my knowledge, only Christian nations. This is not by chance.
You're right, it's not by chance. Christian nations are the only ones that jews can parasitize effectively in the first place.
Basically, every gun group and militia in the US is full of Christian Zionists. The jews don't need to disarm these people because they are all on the jews' side. I think all the talk of a gun ban is just a diversion to keep these people invested in their current Republican ideology and not consider alternatives. Let them have a victory. "We still got our guns! We're gonna rebel when Obama tries to impose sharia law on us!" Meanwhile the country keeps getting browner and the economy keeps going to complete shit, but the Christian Zionist gun nut types just keep running diversions to take attention off the actual problems.
Whites are racially distinct from jews. White men and women, minds jewed-up or not, are not something a racially aware White man discards so dismissively.
Whites are racially distinct from jews. White men and women, minds jewed-up or not, are not something a racially aware White man discards so dismissively.
So says the guy who did about a thousand blog posts praising Breivik's slaughter of young, anti-Zionist Whites.
I don't think Christian Zionists should be killed, I just think they need to have some sense slapped into them. In order to do that, we need to be realistic about what they are and be willing to criticize them. Most WNs, like you, want to delude themselves into thinking that these people are already on our side and are meaningfully resisting the jews. That only worsens the problem.
Seriously, you cheer along with the jews when Whites who oppose them get killed, yet get super defensive when pro-jew conservative Whites come under any criticism. You write some okay stuff now and then but functionally I'd say you still remain true to your neocon roots.
Here are my posts tagged breivik. I count 10. Now quote me "praising Breivik's slaughter of young, anti-Zionist Whites" or "cheer[ing] along with the jews". You won't because you can't.
By the way, the jewish problem isn't zionism or neocons, it's jews.
Here are my posts tagged breivik. I count 10. Now quote me "praising Breivik's slaughter of young, anti-Zionist Whites" or "cheer[ing] along with the jews". You won't because you can't.
Everything you said about Breivik was positive! Now you're seriously disputing that you supported his actions? (Or the actions attributed to him, anyway, but that's sort of beside the point here.)
By the way, the jewish problem isn't zionism or neocons, it's jews.
That's only partially true. Obviously we can't put up any serious opposition to jews with our current numbers, can we? That means we must focus on disabusing Whites of their pro-jew or jew-neutral beliefs before we can do anything else. But it seems like you (and most WNs, realistically) don't want that to occur.
The opinions I've offered concerning Breivik have focused mainly on how the mainstream judaized media has reacted to him.
I have no first-hand knowledge of what Breivik did or didn't do. I regard him much as Matra described at Mangan's (http://mangans.blogspot.com/2011/07/breiviks-ideology-doesnt-matter.html, a page which apparently no longer exists):
Matra said...
Opponents of immigration/multiculturalism should merely call this blowback. US foreign policy in the Middle East led to blowback on 9/11 and now the consequences of mass immigration ('colonisation' as ABB put it in his court statement on Monday) has resulted in blowback in Norway. Many people who despised Bin Laden could at the same time believe the left's 9/11 blowback argument because a lot of what they were saying was undeniably true.
The reaction should be as follows: "The governing class's determination to continue its policy of mass immigration coupled with its suppression of all legitimate resistance to this policy led to blowback in the form of ABB. The members of the governing class, including the parents of Labor youth group, need to ask themselves 'Why do they hate us?'. In order to prevent similar tragedies by desperate individuals and groups who believe their voices are not being heard the government and the media must allow for an open debate on immigration with those who oppose government policy permitted to participate without fear of abuse and/or legal sanctions."
Such a moderate sounding statement by nationalists will win favour with ordinary people and put the left in an awkward position. It should go without saying no nationalist parties or activists should endorse the attacks but there's also no need for grovelling or any other displays of weakness.
7/26/2011 1:34 PM
Matra quote: The reaction should be as follows: "The governing class's determination to continue its policy of mass immigration coupled with its suppression of all legitimate resistance to this policy led to blowback in the form of ABB.
The anti-White lobby caused ABB, and it is obvious that they couldn't care less how many White people were killed by ABB. Their moral posturing and their accusations against us are all the more sickening.
Besides, that killing is nothing compared to the destruction of the whole western world by the anti-White lobby.
Post a Comment
<< Home