Blog has moved, searching new blog...

Tuesday, October 18, 2005

Moonbat Hero: Noam Chomsky

Chomsky named top intellectual: British poll
Chomsky was unimpressed with the honour, telling The Guardian newspaper that polls were something "I don't pay a lot of attention to," adding that "it was probably padded by some friends of mine."
Probably? How else could someone with such a
deeply flawed view of economics who says patently ridiculous things like:
Any dictator would admire the uniformity and obedience of the (U.S.) media.
be voted "top intellectual" except by comrades who share his anti-American beliefs?

Here for example is one comrade who shares Chomsky's delusion that we live in tyranny - a tyranny that somehow can't seem to keep them from writing fulsome little turgid screeds:
Having made the assertion that the United States is evolving into an overt tyranny, I will turn to a question many readers have asked me by email. What do we do about it?

I want to start by quoting Noam Chomsky from his latest book, Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post 9/11 World:

“We have every option open to us, and have none of the problems that are faced by intellectuals in Turkey or campesinos in Brazil. We can do anything. But people here are trained to believe that there are easy answers, and it doesn't work that way. If you want to do something, you have to be dedicated and committed to it day after day. Educational programs, organizing, activism. That's the way things change. You want a magic key so you can go back to watching television tomorrow? It doesn't exist.”
This is the same comrade who thinks Jihadi terror is all our fault. Oddly enough Chomsky and his followers, who have every option open to them, freely choose to undermine the system and traditions that have given them every option.

Is it possible to be a "top intellectual" without being intellectually honest? Read Dissecting Chomsky and Anti-Americanism and judge for yourself:
The United States has made mistakes, but those who would judge our behavior and our record should look to real historians and real historical contexts, not the fabricated conspiracies of Noam Chomsky and his ilk.
white

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home