Blog has moved, searching new blog...

Wednesday, September 28, 2005


Anatomy of a Photograph
The San Francisco Chronicle featured the original photograph on its front page in order to convey a positive message about the rally -- perhaps that even politically aware teenagers were inspired to show up and rally for peace, sporting the message, "People of Color say 'No to War!'" And that served the Chronicle's agenda.
But this simple analysis reveals the very subtle but insidious type of bias that occurs in the media all the time. The Chronicle did not print an inaccuracy, nor did it doctor a photograph to misrepresent the facts. Instead, the Chronicle committed the sin of omission: it told you the truth, but it didn't tell you the whole truth.
Because the whole truth -- that the girl was part of a group of naive teenagers recruited by Communist activists to wear terrorist-style bandannas and carry Palestinian flags and obscene placards -- is disturbing, and doesn't conform to the narrative that the Chronicle is trying to promote. By presenting the photo out of context, and only showing the one image that suits its purpose, the Chronicle is intentionally manipulating the reader's impression of the rally, and the rally's intent.
Such tactics -- in the no-man's-land between ethical and unethical -- are commonplace in the media, and have been for decades. It is only now, with the advent of citizen journalism, that we can at last begin to see the whole story and realize that the public has been manipulated like this all along.
Via Little Green Footballs, which regularly provides examples of misleading cropping.

Here's another good one.

UPDATE: Hugh Hewitt reports on the Chronicle's response to the criticism, and neatly summarizes:
Did the photo inform or mislead. It clearly misled. That's the point. The only point.



Blogger flippityflopitty said...

Say its not so...

I for one am outraged by the SF Chronicle's blatant disregard for journalistic integrity.

Cropping photos... mistake, the use of cropped photos. There is no clear evidence the writer of the piece had any knowledge the photo was cropped or was even present at the rally.

"Intelligence failures" aside this behavior is inexcusable. The writer and more importantly the editor and owners of the SF Chronicle have a responsibility to evaluate the source and should be held responsible for such inexcusable behavior ala Dan Rather.

Its not like our government engages in such misleading behavior...

You will particularly like cjrdaily:

Didnt Ahnald do this with your taxes as well?

I think I will stick to my fair & balanced, right-wing, unsensationalist New York Post:

(I particularly like the "Hill No" and "Miracle" headlines).

What happened to the Tan who belittles unnewsworthy left-wing conspiracy dribble like global warming, environmental impacts and voter disenfranchisement.

This is the story that trumps it?

9/28/2005 09:26:00 AM  
Blogger Tanstaafl said...

You should start a blog called Age of Tabloid Politics. This one concerns treason against civilization.

9/29/2005 11:38:00 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home